From: Bill Huey (hui) <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>
To: Robert Crocombe <rcrocomb@gmail.com>
Cc: Esben Nielsen <nielsen.esben@googlemail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Bill Huey (hui)" <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>
Subject: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:37:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060822013722.GA628@gnuppy.monkey.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e6babb600608211721g739c5518sa14427d1e9f2334@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 05:21:35PM -0700, Robert Crocombe wrote:
> On 8/18/06, hui Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> wrote:
> >Patch attached:
>
> The problem still appears to happen, but now I get no trace at all,
> just a single line reported to the machine's console (and not on the
> serial console):
>
> pdflush/314[CPU#2]: BUG in debug_rt_mutex_unlock at
> kernel/rt_mutex_debug.c:471
>
> i.e., a standard statement, except at pdflush instead of swapper this time.
Thanks for testing. I appreciate this and I'm more than just plain willing
to help out. Any thing goes to get this patch solid. :)
I'll come up with a patch tomorrow to try and get a clean stack trace. I've
made some change to the bug dump output to make it more preemption aware,
but, as you can, some tweeking is needed.
However, I don't think this is going to be a simple atomic violation problem
that I've seen numerous times before. That's what the previous patch tried to
address. It's seriously pointing to a problem with the rtmutex and/or how it's
used, maybe a corner case it's missing.
I'll start to look at it either tonight or tomorrow and see what's going on.
It's going to take me a bit so be patient. I'll definitely get back to you
on this. I've got a number of weeks to blow exclusively on -rt development,
so I'll be around for a little while longer, hopefully longer.
bill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-22 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <e6babb600608012231r74470b77x6e7eaeab222ee160@mail.gmail.com>
2006-08-02 5:37 ` Problems with 2.6.17-rt8 Robert Crocombe
2006-08-02 17:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-03 11:48 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-03 14:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-03 15:08 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-03 15:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-03 15:48 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-03 16:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-03 17:16 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-03 20:22 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-03 20:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-03 21:18 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-08 2:56 ` [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() " Bill Huey
2006-08-08 3:05 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-08 18:46 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-08 19:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-08 21:35 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-08 21:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-08 22:10 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-09 17:19 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-09 0:35 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-11 7:47 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-11 14:52 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-09 22:05 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-08-10 0:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-10 2:18 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-11 1:06 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-11 8:16 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-08-11 8:46 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-11 15:00 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-11 21:18 ` Bill Huey
[not found] ` <20060811221054.GA32459@gnuppy.monkey.org>
2006-08-14 17:56 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-14 23:44 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-15 10:43 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-15 17:53 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-18 11:59 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-22 0:21 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-22 1:37 ` Bill Huey [this message]
2006-08-22 23:20 ` rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...) Bill Huey
2006-08-22 23:21 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-23 17:14 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-23 17:24 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-23 20:20 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-23 21:05 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-23 21:08 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-24 1:22 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-24 1:46 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-25 7:19 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-26 1:24 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-26 1:28 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-26 2:37 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-26 10:28 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-26 10:49 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-28 18:33 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-28 20:28 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-29 4:05 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-29 17:11 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-29 17:19 ` Robert Crocombe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060822013722.GA628@gnuppy.monkey.org \
--to=billh@gnuppy.monkey.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nielsen.esben@googlemail.com \
--cc=rcrocomb@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.