From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: Tsutomu OWA <tsutomu.owa@toshiba.co.jp>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, mingo@elte.hu,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] powerpc 2.6.16-rt17: to build on powerpc w/ RT
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:56:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1155318983.5337.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yyiac6biz3c.wl@forest.swc.toshiba.co.jp>
On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 15:08 +0900, Tsutomu OWA wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:11:47 +1000
> > Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> said:
>
> > I would be very surprised if this is all that is required for
> > CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME to work correctly on powerpc. Have you verified
> > that the CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME stuff works correctly on powerpc and
> > provides all the features provided by the current implementation?
>
> Well, probably no as you say so.
>
> What I did for CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME is just to fix a compile
> error and to see if the kernel boots or not. As I mentioned,
> it's experimental and is posted to see whether I'm moving in the
> right direction or not.
>
> I'm afraid I have not yet looked into any generic time related
> features/implementations. Looks like generic time related things
> should be on the ToDo list.
You might take a peek at the patch set here:
http://sr71.net/~jstultz/tod/ for a somewhat rough powerpc conversion to
CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME.
thanks
-john
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: Tsutomu OWA <tsutomu.owa@toshiba.co.jp>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] powerpc 2.6.16-rt17: to build on powerpc w/ RT
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:56:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1155318983.5337.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yyiac6biz3c.wl@forest.swc.toshiba.co.jp>
On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 15:08 +0900, Tsutomu OWA wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:11:47 +1000
> > Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> said:
>
> > I would be very surprised if this is all that is required for
> > CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME to work correctly on powerpc. Have you verified
> > that the CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME stuff works correctly on powerpc and
> > provides all the features provided by the current implementation?
>
> Well, probably no as you say so.
>
> What I did for CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME is just to fix a compile
> error and to see if the kernel boots or not. As I mentioned,
> it's experimental and is posted to see whether I'm moving in the
> right direction or not.
>
> I'm afraid I have not yet looked into any generic time related
> features/implementations. Looks like generic time related things
> should be on the ToDo list.
You might take a peek at the patch set here:
http://sr71.net/~jstultz/tod/ for a somewhat rough powerpc conversion to
CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME.
thanks
-john
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-11 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-11 2:01 [RFC PATCH 1/4] powerpc 2.6.16-rt17: to build on powerpc w/ RT Tsutomu OWA
2006-08-11 2:01 ` Tsutomu OWA
2006-08-11 5:11 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-08-11 5:11 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-08-11 6:08 ` Tsutomu OWA
2006-08-11 6:08 ` Tsutomu OWA
2006-08-11 17:56 ` john stultz [this message]
2006-08-11 17:56 ` john stultz
2006-08-16 23:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-08-16 23:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-08-17 0:00 ` john stultz
2006-08-17 0:00 ` john stultz
2006-08-17 0:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-08-17 0:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-08-17 0:56 ` john stultz
2006-08-17 0:56 ` john stultz
2006-08-17 4:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-08-17 4:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-08-21 10:01 ` Tsutomu OWA
2006-08-21 10:01 ` Tsutomu OWA
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1155318983.5337.2.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tsutomu.owa@toshiba.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.