From: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@nokia.com>
To: ext David Singleton <daviado@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pm <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: So, what's the status on the recent patches here?
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:27:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1157030838.10909.144.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b324b5ad0608281829t66bb3060r9fda9fc08841b51@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 18:29 -0700, ext David Singleton wrote:
> >
> > - latency is not an attribute of a certain operating point but a
> function of
> > two arguments - current operating point and a point we are goint to
> > switch to. Therefor latency just does not belong to 'struct powerop'
>
> I disagree.
Problem is that you disagree without giving your reasons. Here is
another reason putting latency into your operating point definition
isn't going to fly:
http://lwn.net/Articles/196900/ <--- An API for specifying latency
constraints
http://lwn.net/Articles/197282/
Please comment on PowerOP patches; dissect them if need be on why you
don't agree with the approach.
Regards,
Amit
--
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@nokia.com>
Nokia
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-31 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 136+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-14 20:07 So, what's the status on the recent patches here? Greg KH
2006-08-14 22:24 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-14 22:46 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-14 23:24 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-14 23:48 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-15 1:00 ` Greg KH
2006-08-15 3:03 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-15 10:35 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-08-15 19:04 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-16 12:58 ` Igor Stoppa
2006-08-17 21:39 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-18 10:02 ` Igor Stoppa
2006-08-18 15:29 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2006-08-18 17:54 ` Igor Stoppa
2006-08-18 21:05 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2006-08-20 13:19 ` Igor Stoppa
2006-08-17 5:20 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-17 7:20 ` Paul Mundt
2006-08-17 9:18 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-08-17 21:40 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-18 5:42 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-08-23 12:28 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-23 15:26 ` Igor Stoppa
2006-08-24 12:58 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-08-25 19:55 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-25 23:26 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-08-26 10:18 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-26 13:30 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-08-26 13:46 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-28 16:40 ` Mark Gross
2006-08-28 17:39 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-29 7:51 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-30 22:13 ` Mark Gross
2006-08-30 22:27 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-18 11:48 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-08-24 7:59 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-30 11:00 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-08-30 22:36 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-31 13:44 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-09-02 11:17 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-17 21:24 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-19 6:10 ` David Singleton
2006-08-22 2:13 ` Greg KH
2006-08-22 5:20 ` David Singleton
2006-08-23 19:05 ` Mark Gross
2006-08-24 12:39 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-19 6:19 ` David Singleton
[not found] ` <20060819184843.GB15644@redhat.com>
2006-08-20 3:20 ` David Singleton
2006-08-20 3:30 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-23 18:50 ` Mark Gross
2006-08-27 4:37 ` David Singleton
2006-08-27 15:41 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-29 15:55 ` David Singleton
2006-08-29 16:34 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-29 17:49 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-08-30 6:20 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-30 13:26 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-08-30 22:50 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-31 0:22 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-08-31 12:04 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-02 18:05 ` David Singleton
2006-09-02 19:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-03 16:25 ` David Singleton
2006-09-03 20:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-03 21:33 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-09 0:39 ` David Singleton
2006-09-09 0:48 ` David Singleton
2006-09-09 16:13 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-09 12:17 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 15:11 ` David Singleton
2006-09-11 17:14 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 18:58 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-30 4:52 ` David Singleton
2006-08-30 5:52 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-30 13:39 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-08-30 22:43 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-27 19:48 ` Greg KH
2006-08-28 0:07 ` David Singleton
2006-08-27 20:54 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-08-28 22:18 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-29 21:46 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-08-29 1:29 ` David Singleton
2006-08-29 22:39 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-08-31 13:27 ` Amit Kucheria [this message]
2006-08-31 19:22 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-09-01 8:11 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-08-14 23:29 ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-08-14 23:48 ` Matthew Locke
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-16 1:27 Scott E. Preece
2006-08-16 15:25 ` Mark Gross
2006-08-20 13:36 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-23 19:20 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-24 8:03 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-24 12:16 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-24 12:29 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-24 14:52 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-25 19:58 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-25 20:05 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-25 20:08 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-25 20:22 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-25 20:34 ` Alan Stern
2006-08-25 21:27 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-25 21:46 ` Alan Stern
2006-08-25 22:03 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-26 2:21 ` Alan Stern
2006-08-25 20:57 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-25 21:13 ` Alan Stern
2006-08-25 21:21 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-25 21:42 ` Alan Stern
2006-08-25 22:11 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-31 0:52 Scott E. Preece
2006-08-31 2:41 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-31 15:14 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-01 14:49 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-03 21:21 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-03 21:54 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-03 21:34 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-03 21:43 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-03 22:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-03 22:12 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-03 22:25 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-03 22:31 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-03 22:41 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-03 22:40 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-04 9:06 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-05 16:45 ` Mark Gross
2006-09-06 10:59 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-03 23:00 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-04 9:12 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-05 10:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-03 23:05 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-04 9:09 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-04 15:43 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-05 16:03 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-05 20:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-06 10:56 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1157030838.10909.144.camel@localhost \
--to=amit.kucheria@nokia.com \
--cc=daviado@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.