From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Enable DEEPNAP power savings mode on 970MP
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:34:24 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1160026464.22232.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061004234141.749b13fb@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 23:41 -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Without this patch, on an idle system I get:
>
> cpu-power-0:21.638
> cpu-power-1:27.102
> cpu-power-2:29.343
> cpu-power-3:25.784
> Total: 103.8W
>
> With this patch:
>
> cpu-power-0:11.730
> cpu-power-1:17.185
> cpu-power-2:18.547
> cpu-power-3:17.528
> Total: 65.0W
>
> If I lower HZ to 100, I can get it as low as:
>
> cpu-power-0:10.938
> cpu-power-1:16.021
> cpu-power-2:17.245
> cpu-power-3:16.145
> Total: 60.2W
>
> Another (older) Quad G5 went from 54W to 39W at HZ=250.
>
> Coming back out of Deep Nap takes 40-70 cycles longer than coming back
> from just Nap (which already takes quite a while). I don't think it'll
> be a performance issue (interrupt latency on an idle system), but in
> case someone does measurements feel free to report them.
Isn't deep nap supposed to only get entered from F/4 which we never
use ?
Ben confused...
>
> Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
>
>
>
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_ppc970.S
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_ppc970.S
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_ppc970.S
> @@ -83,6 +83,22 @@ _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_ppc970)
> rldimi r0,r11,52,8 /* set NAP and DPM */
> li r11,0
> rldimi r0,r11,32,31 /* clear EN_ATTN */
> + b load_hids /* Jump to shared code */
> +
> +
> +_GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_ppc970MP)
> + /* Do nothing if not running in HV mode */
> + mfmsr r0
> + rldicl. r0,r0,4,63
> + beqlr
> +
> + mfspr r0,SPRN_HID0
> + li r11,0x15 /* clear DOZE and SLEEP */
> + rldimi r0,r11,52,6 /* set DEEPNAP, NAP and DPM */
> + li r11,0
> + rldimi r0,r11,32,31 /* clear EN_ATTN */
> +
> +load_hids:
> mtspr SPRN_HID0,r0
> mfspr r0,SPRN_HID0
> mfspr r0,SPRN_HID0
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ extern void __setup_cpu_745x(unsigned lo
> #endif /* CONFIG_PPC32 */
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> extern void __setup_cpu_ppc970(unsigned long offset, struct cpu_spec* spec);
> +extern void __setup_cpu_ppc970MP(unsigned long offset, struct cpu_spec* spec);
> extern void __restore_cpu_ppc970(void);
> #endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
>
> @@ -221,7 +222,7 @@ struct cpu_spec cpu_specs[] = {
> .icache_bsize = 128,
> .dcache_bsize = 128,
> .num_pmcs = 8,
> - .cpu_setup = __setup_cpu_ppc970,
> + .cpu_setup = __setup_cpu_ppc970MP,
> .cpu_restore = __restore_cpu_ppc970,
> .oprofile_cpu_type = "ppc64/970",
> .oprofile_type = PPC_OPROFILE_POWER4,
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Enable DEEPNAP power savings mode on 970MP
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:34:24 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1160026464.22232.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061004234141.749b13fb@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 23:41 -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Without this patch, on an idle system I get:
>
> cpu-power-0:21.638
> cpu-power-1:27.102
> cpu-power-2:29.343
> cpu-power-3:25.784
> Total: 103.8W
>
> With this patch:
>
> cpu-power-0:11.730
> cpu-power-1:17.185
> cpu-power-2:18.547
> cpu-power-3:17.528
> Total: 65.0W
>
> If I lower HZ to 100, I can get it as low as:
>
> cpu-power-0:10.938
> cpu-power-1:16.021
> cpu-power-2:17.245
> cpu-power-3:16.145
> Total: 60.2W
>
> Another (older) Quad G5 went from 54W to 39W at HZ=250.
>
> Coming back out of Deep Nap takes 40-70 cycles longer than coming back
> from just Nap (which already takes quite a while). I don't think it'll
> be a performance issue (interrupt latency on an idle system), but in
> case someone does measurements feel free to report them.
Isn't deep nap supposed to only get entered from F/4 which we never
use ?
Ben confused...
>
> Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
>
>
>
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_ppc970.S
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_ppc970.S
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_ppc970.S
> @@ -83,6 +83,22 @@ _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_ppc970)
> rldimi r0,r11,52,8 /* set NAP and DPM */
> li r11,0
> rldimi r0,r11,32,31 /* clear EN_ATTN */
> + b load_hids /* Jump to shared code */
> +
> +
> +_GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_ppc970MP)
> + /* Do nothing if not running in HV mode */
> + mfmsr r0
> + rldicl. r0,r0,4,63
> + beqlr
> +
> + mfspr r0,SPRN_HID0
> + li r11,0x15 /* clear DOZE and SLEEP */
> + rldimi r0,r11,52,6 /* set DEEPNAP, NAP and DPM */
> + li r11,0
> + rldimi r0,r11,32,31 /* clear EN_ATTN */
> +
> +load_hids:
> mtspr SPRN_HID0,r0
> mfspr r0,SPRN_HID0
> mfspr r0,SPRN_HID0
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ extern void __setup_cpu_745x(unsigned lo
> #endif /* CONFIG_PPC32 */
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> extern void __setup_cpu_ppc970(unsigned long offset, struct cpu_spec* spec);
> +extern void __setup_cpu_ppc970MP(unsigned long offset, struct cpu_spec* spec);
> extern void __restore_cpu_ppc970(void);
> #endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
>
> @@ -221,7 +222,7 @@ struct cpu_spec cpu_specs[] = {
> .icache_bsize = 128,
> .dcache_bsize = 128,
> .num_pmcs = 8,
> - .cpu_setup = __setup_cpu_ppc970,
> + .cpu_setup = __setup_cpu_ppc970MP,
> .cpu_restore = __restore_cpu_ppc970,
> .oprofile_cpu_type = "ppc64/970",
> .oprofile_type = PPC_OPROFILE_POWER4,
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-05 5:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-05 4:41 [PATCH] powerpc: Enable DEEPNAP power savings mode on 970MP Olof Johansson
2006-10-05 5:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2006-10-05 5:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-10-05 14:21 ` Olof Johansson
2006-10-05 14:21 ` Olof Johansson
2006-10-05 19:25 ` Michael Buesch
2006-10-05 19:25 ` Michael Buesch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1160026464.22232.16.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.