All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Amol Lad <amol@verismonetworks.com>
Cc: linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel Janitors <kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/char/riscom8.c:
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 12:18:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1160828292.5732.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1160811574.19143.391.camel@amol.verismonetworks.com>

Ar Sad, 2006-10-14 am 13:09 +0530, ysgrifennodd Amol Lad:
> On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 16:00 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Ar Gwe, 2006-10-13 am 17:10 +0530, ysgrifennodd Amol Lad:
> > > Removed save_flags()/cli()/sti() and used (light weight) spin locks
> > > 
> > 
> > Have you tested this and verified there are no recursive locking cases
> > in your changes ?
> 
> I doxygend riscom8.c and used call graphs to verify there are no
> recursive locks. I did a code review also

Thanks for the info. I'll give the code a second review (also not having
hardware) and then send you/Andrew either an Ack or corrections.

Alan

_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Amol Lad <amol@verismonetworks.com>
Cc: linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel Janitors <kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/char/riscom8.c: save_flags()/cli()/sti() removal
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 13:18:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1160828292.5732.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1160811574.19143.391.camel@amol.verismonetworks.com>

Ar Sad, 2006-10-14 am 13:09 +0530, ysgrifennodd Amol Lad:
> On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 16:00 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Ar Gwe, 2006-10-13 am 17:10 +0530, ysgrifennodd Amol Lad:
> > > Removed save_flags()/cli()/sti() and used (light weight) spin locks
> > > 
> > 
> > Have you tested this and verified there are no recursive locking cases
> > in your changes ?
> 
> I doxygend riscom8.c and used call graphs to verify there are no
> recursive locks. I did a code review also

Thanks for the info. I'll give the code a second review (also not having
hardware) and then send you/Andrew either an Ack or corrections.

Alan


  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-14 12:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-13 11:40 [PATCH] drivers/char/riscom8.c: save_flags()/cli()/sti() removal Amol Lad
2006-10-13 11:52 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/char/riscom8.c: save_flags()/cli()/sti() Amol Lad
2006-10-13 11:56 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/char/riscom8.c: Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-13 11:56   ` [PATCH] drivers/char/riscom8.c: save_flags()/cli()/sti() removal Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-13 12:36   ` Amol Lad
2006-10-13 12:48     ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/char/riscom8.c: Amol Lad
2006-10-13 15:00 ` Alan Cox
2006-10-13 15:00   ` [PATCH] drivers/char/riscom8.c: save_flags()/cli()/sti() removal Alan Cox
2006-10-14  7:39   ` Amol Lad
2006-10-14  7:51     ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/char/riscom8.c: Amol Lad
2006-10-14 12:18     ` Alan Cox [this message]
2006-10-14 12:18       ` [PATCH] drivers/char/riscom8.c: save_flags()/cli()/sti() removal Alan Cox
2006-10-14 14:20 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/char/riscom8.c: Alan Cox
2006-10-14 14:20   ` [PATCH] drivers/char/riscom8.c: save_flags()/cli()/sti() removal Alan Cox
2006-10-14 17:49   ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/char/riscom8.c: Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-14 17:49     ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/char/riscom8.c: save_flags()/cli()/sti() removal Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-14 18:41     ` [KJ] [PATCH] Alan Cox
2006-10-14 18:41       ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/char/riscom8.c: save_flags()/cli()/sti() removal Alan Cox
2006-10-14 18:50       ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/char/riscom8.c: Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-14 18:50         ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/char/riscom8.c: save_flags()/cli()/sti() removal Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-16  4:32   ` Amol Lad
2006-10-16  4:44     ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/char/riscom8.c: Amol Lad

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1160828292.5732.2.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=amol@verismonetworks.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.