From: Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: kernel BUG in __cache_alloc_node at linux-2.6.git/mm/slab.c:3177!
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:19:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1161357566.8946.62.camel@farscape> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4538DACC.5050605@shadowen.org>
On Fri, 2006-20-10 at 15:18 +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > Christoph Lameter writes:
> >
I got dropped off the CC list somewhere.. :-(
if something is bouncing, let me know,.. otherwise please dont do
that..
> Mel Gorman and I have been poking at this from different ends. Mel from
> the context of this thread and myself trying to fix a machine which was
> exhibiting on 32MB of ram in node 0 and the rest in node 1.
>
> I remember that we used to have code to cope with this in the ppc64
> architecture, indeed I remember reviewing it all that time ago. Looking
> at the current state of the tree it was removed in the two patches below
> in mainline:
> "[PATCH] Remove SPAN_OTHER_NODES config definition"
> "[PATCH] mm: remove arch independent NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES"
>
> These commits:
> f62859bb6871c5e4a8e591c60befc8caaf54db8c
> a94b3ab7eab4edcc9b2cb474b188f774c331adf7
>
> I'll follow up to this email with the reversion patch we used in
> testing. It seems to sort this problem out at least, though now its
> blam'ing in ibmveth, so am retesting with yet another patch. This patch
> reverts the two patches above and updates the commentry on the Kconfig
> entry.
I've got a couple LPARs that exhibit the problem, so can verify your
patch once I see it..
-Will
>
> -apw
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
akpm@osdl.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Mike Kravetz <kravetz@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: kernel BUG in __cache_alloc_node at linux-2.6.git/mm/slab.c:3177!
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:19:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1161357566.8946.62.camel@farscape> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4538DACC.5050605@shadowen.org>
On Fri, 2006-20-10 at 15:18 +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > Christoph Lameter writes:
> >
I got dropped off the CC list somewhere.. :-(
if something is bouncing, let me know,.. otherwise please dont do
that..
> Mel Gorman and I have been poking at this from different ends. Mel from
> the context of this thread and myself trying to fix a machine which was
> exhibiting on 32MB of ram in node 0 and the rest in node 1.
>
> I remember that we used to have code to cope with this in the ppc64
> architecture, indeed I remember reviewing it all that time ago. Looking
> at the current state of the tree it was removed in the two patches below
> in mainline:
> "[PATCH] Remove SPAN_OTHER_NODES config definition"
> "[PATCH] mm: remove arch independent NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES"
>
> These commits:
> f62859bb6871c5e4a8e591c60befc8caaf54db8c
> a94b3ab7eab4edcc9b2cb474b188f774c331adf7
>
> I'll follow up to this email with the reversion patch we used in
> testing. It seems to sort this problem out at least, though now its
> blam'ing in ibmveth, so am retesting with yet another patch. This patch
> reverts the two patches above and updates the commentry on the Kconfig
> entry.
I've got a couple LPARs that exhibit the problem, so can verify your
patch once I see it..
-Will
>
> -apw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-20 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-13 18:41 kernel BUG in __cache_alloc_node at linux-2.6.git/mm/slab.c:3177! Will Schmidt
2006-10-13 19:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-13 19:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-13 19:53 ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-13 20:57 ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-13 21:22 ` Nathan Lynch
2006-10-13 21:22 ` Nathan Lynch
2006-10-13 21:34 ` Anton Blanchard
2006-10-13 21:34 ` Anton Blanchard
2006-10-13 22:01 ` Mike Kravetz
2006-10-13 22:01 ` Mike Kravetz
2006-10-13 22:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-16 16:00 ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-16 19:20 ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-16 19:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-16 20:50 ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-16 23:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-18 6:11 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-18 6:11 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-18 15:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-18 15:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-18 21:19 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-18 21:19 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-18 21:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-18 21:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-18 21:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-18 21:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 5:03 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-19 5:03 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-19 16:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 16:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 16:30 ` Anton Blanchard
2006-10-19 16:30 ` Anton Blanchard
2006-10-19 16:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 16:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 22:23 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-19 22:23 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-19 22:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 22:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-20 7:18 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-20 7:18 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-20 14:18 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-10-20 14:18 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-10-20 14:31 ` [PATCH] Reintroduce NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES for powerpc Andy Whitcroft
2006-10-20 16:30 ` Mel Gorman
2006-10-20 16:30 ` Mel Gorman
2006-10-20 14:59 ` kernel BUG in __cache_alloc_node at linux-2.6.git/mm/slab.c:3177! Mike Kravetz
2006-10-20 14:59 ` Mike Kravetz
2006-10-20 15:19 ` Will Schmidt [this message]
2006-10-20 15:19 ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-20 16:00 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-10-20 16:00 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-10-20 17:09 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-20 17:09 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-20 17:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-20 17:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-20 18:07 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-10-20 18:07 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-10-20 17:13 ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-20 17:13 ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-20 17:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-20 17:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-20 22:54 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-20 22:54 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-19 17:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 17:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 18:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 18:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 20:37 ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-19 20:37 ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-19 21:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 21:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 21:43 ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-19 21:43 ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-19 22:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 22:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 21:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 21:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 20:38 ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-19 20:38 ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-19 21:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 21:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-18 16:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-18 16:06 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1161357566.8946.62.camel@farscape \
--to=will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.