All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: kernel BUG in __cache_alloc_node at linux-2.6.git/mm/slab.c:3177!
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:09:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061020100904.ed1fa0af.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4538F2A2.5040305@shadowen.org>

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:00:34 +0100
Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org> wrote:

> > I'll follow up to this email with the reversion patch we used in
> > testing.  It seems to sort this problem out at least, though now its
> > blam'ing in ibmveth, so am retesting with yet another patch.  This patch
> > reverts the two patches above and updates the commentry on the Kconfig
> > entry.
> 
> Ok, I've just gotten a successful boot on this box for the first time in
> like 15 git releases.  I needed the three patches below:
> 
> clameter-fallback_alloc_fix2 -- from earlier in this thread, under the
> message ID below:
>     <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610131515200.28279@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

That's this:

Here is another fall back fix checking if the slab has already been setup 
for this node. MPOL_INTERLEAVE could redirect the allocation.

Index: linux-2.6.19-rc1-mm1/mm/slab.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.19-rc1-mm1.orig/mm/slab.c	2006-10-10 21:47:12.949563383 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc1-mm1/mm/slab.c	2006-10-13 17:21:31.937863714 -0500
@@ -3158,12 +3158,15 @@ void *fallback_alloc(struct kmem_cache *
 	struct zone **z;
 	void *obj = NULL;
 
-	for (z = zonelist->zones; *z && !obj; z++)
+	for (z = zonelist->zones; *z && !obj; z++) {
+		int nid = zone_to_nid(*z);
+
 		if (zone_idx(*z) <= ZONE_NORMAL &&
-				cpuset_zone_allowed(*z, flags))
+				cpuset_zone_allowed(*z, flags) &&
+				cache->nodelists[nid])
 			obj = __cache_alloc_node(cache,
-					flags | __GFP_THISNODE,
-					zone_to_nid(*z));
+					flags | __GFP_THISNODE, nid);
+	}
 	return obj;
 }
 

Christoph, can you please finalise and resend that?

> Reintroduce-NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES-for-powerpc -- the patch I just
> submitted, under the message ID below:
>     <8a76dfd735e544016c5f04c98617b87d@pinky>

OK, I got that.

> ibmveth-fix-index-increment-calculation -- this patch is already in -mm.

Normally a Jeff thing, but small-and-simple.  I'll send that in to Linus
today.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Mike Kravetz <kravetz@us.ibm.com>,
	will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Subject: Re: kernel BUG in __cache_alloc_node at linux-2.6.git/mm/slab.c:3177!
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:09:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061020100904.ed1fa0af.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4538F2A2.5040305@shadowen.org>

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:00:34 +0100
Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org> wrote:

> > I'll follow up to this email with the reversion patch we used in
> > testing.  It seems to sort this problem out at least, though now its
> > blam'ing in ibmveth, so am retesting with yet another patch.  This patch
> > reverts the two patches above and updates the commentry on the Kconfig
> > entry.
> 
> Ok, I've just gotten a successful boot on this box for the first time in
> like 15 git releases.  I needed the three patches below:
> 
> clameter-fallback_alloc_fix2 -- from earlier in this thread, under the
> message ID below:
>     <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610131515200.28279@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

That's this:

Here is another fall back fix checking if the slab has already been setup 
for this node. MPOL_INTERLEAVE could redirect the allocation.

Index: linux-2.6.19-rc1-mm1/mm/slab.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.19-rc1-mm1.orig/mm/slab.c	2006-10-10 21:47:12.949563383 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc1-mm1/mm/slab.c	2006-10-13 17:21:31.937863714 -0500
@@ -3158,12 +3158,15 @@ void *fallback_alloc(struct kmem_cache *
 	struct zone **z;
 	void *obj = NULL;
 
-	for (z = zonelist->zones; *z && !obj; z++)
+	for (z = zonelist->zones; *z && !obj; z++) {
+		int nid = zone_to_nid(*z);
+
 		if (zone_idx(*z) <= ZONE_NORMAL &&
-				cpuset_zone_allowed(*z, flags))
+				cpuset_zone_allowed(*z, flags) &&
+				cache->nodelists[nid])
 			obj = __cache_alloc_node(cache,
-					flags | __GFP_THISNODE,
-					zone_to_nid(*z));
+					flags | __GFP_THISNODE, nid);
+	}
 	return obj;
 }
 

Christoph, can you please finalise and resend that?

> Reintroduce-NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES-for-powerpc -- the patch I just
> submitted, under the message ID below:
>     <8a76dfd735e544016c5f04c98617b87d@pinky>

OK, I got that.

> ibmveth-fix-index-increment-calculation -- this patch is already in -mm.

Normally a Jeff thing, but small-and-simple.  I'll send that in to Linus
today.


  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-20 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-13 18:41 kernel BUG in __cache_alloc_node at linux-2.6.git/mm/slab.c:3177! Will Schmidt
2006-10-13 19:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-13 19:05   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-13 19:53   ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-13 20:57     ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-13 21:22       ` Nathan Lynch
2006-10-13 21:22         ` Nathan Lynch
2006-10-13 21:34         ` Anton Blanchard
2006-10-13 21:34           ` Anton Blanchard
2006-10-13 22:01         ` Mike Kravetz
2006-10-13 22:01           ` Mike Kravetz
2006-10-13 22:22       ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-16 16:00         ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-16 19:20         ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-16 19:25           ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-16 20:50             ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-16 23:37               ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-18  6:11                 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-18  6:11                   ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-18 15:12                   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-18 15:12                     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-18 21:19                     ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-18 21:19                       ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-18 21:26                       ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-18 21:26                         ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-18 21:49                       ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-18 21:49                         ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19  5:03                         ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-19  5:03                           ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-19 16:16                           ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 16:16                             ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 16:30                             ` Anton Blanchard
2006-10-19 16:30                               ` Anton Blanchard
2006-10-19 16:49                               ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 16:49                                 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 22:23                                 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-19 22:23                                   ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-19 22:31                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 22:31                                     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-20  7:18                                     ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-20  7:18                                       ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-20 14:18                                       ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-10-20 14:18                                         ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-10-20 14:31                                         ` [PATCH] Reintroduce NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES for powerpc Andy Whitcroft
2006-10-20 16:30                                           ` Mel Gorman
2006-10-20 16:30                                             ` Mel Gorman
2006-10-20 14:59                                         ` kernel BUG in __cache_alloc_node at linux-2.6.git/mm/slab.c:3177! Mike Kravetz
2006-10-20 14:59                                           ` Mike Kravetz
2006-10-20 15:19                                         ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-20 15:19                                           ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-20 16:00                                         ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-10-20 16:00                                           ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-10-20 17:09                                           ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-10-20 17:09                                             ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-20 17:46                                             ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-20 17:46                                               ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-20 18:07                                               ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-10-20 18:07                                                 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-10-20 17:13                                           ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-20 17:13                                             ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-20 17:34                                       ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-20 17:34                                         ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-20 22:54                                         ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-20 22:54                                           ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-19 17:03                               ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 17:03                                 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 18:07                                 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 18:07                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 20:37                                 ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-19 20:37                                   ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-19 21:28                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 21:28                                     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 21:43                                     ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-19 21:43                                       ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-19 22:00                                       ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 22:00                                         ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 21:39                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 21:39                                     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 20:38                             ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-19 20:38                               ` Will Schmidt
2006-10-19 21:30                               ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-19 21:30                                 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-18 16:06                   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-18 16:06                     ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061020100904.ed1fa0af.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=apw@shadowen.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.