From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Zhao Forrest <forrest.zhao@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why kmem_cache_free occupy CPU for more than 10 seconds?
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:19:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1176369596.6893.105.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070412005535.951ccb4b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 00:55 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:39:25 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 15:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > There used to be a cond_resched() in invalidate_mapping_pages() which would
> > > have prevented this, but I rudely removed it to support
> > > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches (which needs to call invalidate_inode_pages()
> > > under spinlock).
> > >
> > > We could resurrect that cond_resched() by passing in some flag, I guess.
> > > Or change the code to poke the softlockup detector. The former would be
> > > better.
> >
> > cond_resched() is conditional on __resched_legal(0)
>
> What's __resched_legal()?
Hmm, I was looking at the RHEL-5 sources, it seems this function was
removed later (commmit 9414232fa0cc28e2f51b8c76d260f2748f7953fc).
> > which should take
> > care of being called under a spinlock.
>
> We only increment preempt_count() in spin_lock() if CONFIG_PREEMPT.
Right, ok, that makes the whole thing fall apart indeed.
> > Index: linux-2.6-mm/mm/truncate.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6-mm.orig/mm/truncate.c
> > +++ linux-2.6-mm/mm/truncate.c
> > @@ -292,6 +292,8 @@ unsigned long invalidate_mapping_pages(s
> > pgoff_t index;
> > int lock_failed;
> >
> > + cond_resched();
> > +
> > lock_failed = TestSetPageLocked(page);
>
> Is deadlocky on the drop_caches path and if CONFIG_PREEMPT we'll get
> scheduling-in-spinlock warnings.
*nod*
> For the blkdev_close() path the change is unneeded if CONFIG_PREEMPT and
> will fix things if !CONFIG_PREEMPT.
>
> We can presumably just remove the invalidate_mapping_pages() call from the
> kill_bdev() path (at least) - kill_bdev()'s truncate_inode_pages() will do
> the same thing.
Certainly looks that way, I'll see if I can spot a hole in that.
> It might be time to remove that unused-for-six-years destroy_dirty_buffers
> too.
ok.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Zhao Forrest <forrest.zhao@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why kmem_cache_free occupy CPU for more than 10 seconds?
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:19:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1176369596.6893.105.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070412005535.951ccb4b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 00:55 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:39:25 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 15:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > There used to be a cond_resched() in invalidate_mapping_pages() which would
> > > have prevented this, but I rudely removed it to support
> > > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches (which needs to call invalidate_inode_pages()
> > > under spinlock).
> > >
> > > We could resurrect that cond_resched() by passing in some flag, I guess.
> > > Or change the code to poke the softlockup detector. The former would be
> > > better.
> >
> > cond_resched() is conditional on __resched_legal(0)
>
> What's __resched_legal()?
Hmm, I was looking at the RHEL-5 sources, it seems this function was
removed later (commmit 9414232fa0cc28e2f51b8c76d260f2748f7953fc).
> > which should take
> > care of being called under a spinlock.
>
> We only increment preempt_count() in spin_lock() if CONFIG_PREEMPT.
Right, ok, that makes the whole thing fall apart indeed.
> > Index: linux-2.6-mm/mm/truncate.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6-mm.orig/mm/truncate.c
> > +++ linux-2.6-mm/mm/truncate.c
> > @@ -292,6 +292,8 @@ unsigned long invalidate_mapping_pages(s
> > pgoff_t index;
> > int lock_failed;
> >
> > + cond_resched();
> > +
> > lock_failed = TestSetPageLocked(page);
>
> Is deadlocky on the drop_caches path and if CONFIG_PREEMPT we'll get
> scheduling-in-spinlock warnings.
*nod*
> For the blkdev_close() path the change is unneeded if CONFIG_PREEMPT and
> will fix things if !CONFIG_PREEMPT.
>
> We can presumably just remove the invalidate_mapping_pages() call from the
> kill_bdev() path (at least) - kill_bdev()'s truncate_inode_pages() will do
> the same thing.
Certainly looks that way, I'll see if I can spot a hole in that.
> It might be time to remove that unused-for-six-years destroy_dirty_buffers
> too.
ok.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-12 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-11 6:17 Why kmem_cache_free occupy CPU for more than 10 seconds? Zhao Forrest
2007-04-11 6:17 ` Zhao Forrest
2007-04-11 6:53 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-04-11 6:53 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-04-11 9:14 ` Zhao Forrest
2007-04-11 9:14 ` Zhao Forrest
2007-04-11 9:53 ` Paul Jackson
2007-04-11 9:53 ` Paul Jackson
2007-04-11 10:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-11 10:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-11 10:10 ` Zhao Forrest
2007-04-11 10:10 ` Zhao Forrest
2007-04-11 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-11 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-11 16:23 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-04-11 16:23 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-04-11 16:44 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-11 16:44 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-11 9:53 ` Zhao Forrest
2007-04-11 9:53 ` Zhao Forrest
2007-04-11 10:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-11 10:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-11 16:35 ` Ken Chen
2007-04-11 16:35 ` Ken Chen
2007-04-12 6:17 ` Zhao Forrest
2007-04-12 6:17 ` Zhao Forrest
2007-04-11 22:30 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-11 22:30 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-12 7:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-12 7:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-12 7:55 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-12 7:55 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-12 9:19 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2007-04-12 9:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] <fa.jxja7Ze2HZEPZZ5vd0w5eLsKf88@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.RbU8KKG9LmOiypCl0DuBe43HL5c@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.7mgz+w23+bQoEmP17EX7CoXvAKk@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.Iwu0x59X2e1XgdDQWyXObWrcbFY@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.Aj3PE3FoH/kmJ6APQFg2oZN1OFc@ifi.uio.no>
2007-04-13 23:26 ` Robert Hancock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1176369596.6893.105.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=forrest.zhao@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.