From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Zhao Forrest <forrest.zhao@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why kmem_cache_free occupy CPU for more than 10 seconds?
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:55:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070412005535.951ccb4b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1176363565.6893.73.camel@twins>
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:39:25 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 15:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > There used to be a cond_resched() in invalidate_mapping_pages() which would
> > have prevented this, but I rudely removed it to support
> > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches (which needs to call invalidate_inode_pages()
> > under spinlock).
> >
> > We could resurrect that cond_resched() by passing in some flag, I guess.
> > Or change the code to poke the softlockup detector. The former would be
> > better.
>
> cond_resched() is conditional on __resched_legal(0)
What's __resched_legal()?
> which should take
> care of being called under a spinlock.
We only increment preempt_count() in spin_lock() if CONFIG_PREEMPT.
> so I guess we can just reinstate the call in invalidate_mapping_pages()
>
> (still waiting on the compile to finish...)
> ---
> invalidate_mapping_pages() is called under locks (usually preemptable)
> but can do a _lot_ of work, stick in a voluntary preemption point to
> avoid excessive latencies (over 10 seconds was reported by softlockup).
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> ---
> mm/truncate.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-mm/mm/truncate.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-mm.orig/mm/truncate.c
> +++ linux-2.6-mm/mm/truncate.c
> @@ -292,6 +292,8 @@ unsigned long invalidate_mapping_pages(s
> pgoff_t index;
> int lock_failed;
>
> + cond_resched();
> +
> lock_failed = TestSetPageLocked(page);
Is deadlocky on the drop_caches path and if CONFIG_PREEMPT we'll get
scheduling-in-spinlock warnings.
For the blkdev_close() path the change is unneeded if CONFIG_PREEMPT and
will fix things if !CONFIG_PREEMPT.
We can presumably just remove the invalidate_mapping_pages() call from the
kill_bdev() path (at least) - kill_bdev()'s truncate_inode_pages() will do
the same thing.
It might be time to remove that unused-for-six-years destroy_dirty_buffers
too.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Zhao Forrest <forrest.zhao@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why kmem_cache_free occupy CPU for more than 10 seconds?
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:55:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070412005535.951ccb4b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1176363565.6893.73.camel@twins>
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:39:25 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 15:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > There used to be a cond_resched() in invalidate_mapping_pages() which would
> > have prevented this, but I rudely removed it to support
> > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches (which needs to call invalidate_inode_pages()
> > under spinlock).
> >
> > We could resurrect that cond_resched() by passing in some flag, I guess.
> > Or change the code to poke the softlockup detector. The former would be
> > better.
>
> cond_resched() is conditional on __resched_legal(0)
What's __resched_legal()?
> which should take
> care of being called under a spinlock.
We only increment preempt_count() in spin_lock() if CONFIG_PREEMPT.
> so I guess we can just reinstate the call in invalidate_mapping_pages()
>
> (still waiting on the compile to finish...)
> ---
> invalidate_mapping_pages() is called under locks (usually preemptable)
> but can do a _lot_ of work, stick in a voluntary preemption point to
> avoid excessive latencies (over 10 seconds was reported by softlockup).
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> ---
> mm/truncate.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-mm/mm/truncate.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-mm.orig/mm/truncate.c
> +++ linux-2.6-mm/mm/truncate.c
> @@ -292,6 +292,8 @@ unsigned long invalidate_mapping_pages(s
> pgoff_t index;
> int lock_failed;
>
> + cond_resched();
> +
> lock_failed = TestSetPageLocked(page);
Is deadlocky on the drop_caches path and if CONFIG_PREEMPT we'll get
scheduling-in-spinlock warnings.
For the blkdev_close() path the change is unneeded if CONFIG_PREEMPT and
will fix things if !CONFIG_PREEMPT.
We can presumably just remove the invalidate_mapping_pages() call from the
kill_bdev() path (at least) - kill_bdev()'s truncate_inode_pages() will do
the same thing.
It might be time to remove that unused-for-six-years destroy_dirty_buffers
too.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-12 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-11 6:17 Why kmem_cache_free occupy CPU for more than 10 seconds? Zhao Forrest
2007-04-11 6:17 ` Zhao Forrest
2007-04-11 6:53 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-04-11 6:53 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-04-11 9:14 ` Zhao Forrest
2007-04-11 9:14 ` Zhao Forrest
2007-04-11 9:53 ` Paul Jackson
2007-04-11 9:53 ` Paul Jackson
2007-04-11 10:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-11 10:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-11 10:10 ` Zhao Forrest
2007-04-11 10:10 ` Zhao Forrest
2007-04-11 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-11 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-11 16:23 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-04-11 16:23 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-04-11 16:44 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-11 16:44 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-11 9:53 ` Zhao Forrest
2007-04-11 9:53 ` Zhao Forrest
2007-04-11 10:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-11 10:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-11 16:35 ` Ken Chen
2007-04-11 16:35 ` Ken Chen
2007-04-12 6:17 ` Zhao Forrest
2007-04-12 6:17 ` Zhao Forrest
2007-04-11 22:30 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-11 22:30 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-12 7:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-12 7:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-12 7:55 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-04-12 7:55 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-12 9:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-12 9:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] <fa.jxja7Ze2HZEPZZ5vd0w5eLsKf88@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.RbU8KKG9LmOiypCl0DuBe43HL5c@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.7mgz+w23+bQoEmP17EX7CoXvAKk@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.Iwu0x59X2e1XgdDQWyXObWrcbFY@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.Aj3PE3FoH/kmJ6APQFg2oZN1OFc@ifi.uio.no>
2007-04-13 23:26 ` Robert Hancock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070412005535.951ccb4b.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=forrest.zhao@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.