All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
To: Jerry Van Baren <gerald.vanbaren@smiths-aerospace.com>
Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Jon Loeliger <jdl@jdl.com>,
	u-boot-users <u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH: dtc take 2] Assemble the blob in memory before writing	it out.
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:03:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1177009395.14328.29.camel@ld0161-tx32> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4627B9C7.8010800@smiths-aerospace.com>

On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 13:49, Jerry Van Baren wrote:

> > 
> > Sorry.  I've been out sick for a couple days here and am
> > just now catching up.  I've read through the last week's
> > worth of mail here now, so let me see if I have properly
> > summarized where things stand and what's needed for the DTC:
> > 
> > These patches need to be applied:
> > 
> >     [PATCH dtc] Add -o <output file> to the usage message.
> >     Sat, 14 Apr 2007 18:16:47 -0400
> > 
> >     [PATCH dtc take 3] Fix reserve map output for asm format.
> >     Tue, 17 Apr 2007 18:14:41 -0400
> > 
> >     [PATCH: dtc take 2] Assemble the blob in memory before writing it out.
> >     Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:59:51 -0400
> > 
> > The last patch there replaces the "Improve -S handling" patches.
> > But does the last patch replace or depend on the second one?
> > 
> > And I agree with David that last patch is a better approach.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > jdl
> 
> Yes, you have that right.

Good.  The drugs aren't too strong yet. :-)

> Patch #1 is good to go
>    [PATCH dtc] Add -o <output file> to the usage message.
>    Sat, 14 Apr 2007 18:16:47 -0400
> 
> Patch #2 and #3...
>    [PATCH dtc take 3] Fix reserve map output for asm format.
>    Tue, 17 Apr 2007 18:14:41 -0400
>    [PATCH: dtc take 2] Assemble the blob in memory before writing it out.
>    Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:59:51 -0400
> 
> ...you force me to make a confession.

It's good for the soul. :-)


> Your option:
> 1) Take the last two patches as is and remove the fprintf yourself
> 2) I'll fix it tonight and provide a New Improved patch

I'll go with Door Number 1!  No problem.

Thanks,
jdl

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH: dtc take 2] Assemble the blob in memory	before writing	it out.
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:03:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1177009395.14328.29.camel@ld0161-tx32> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4627B9C7.8010800@smiths-aerospace.com>

On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 13:49, Jerry Van Baren wrote:

> > 
> > Sorry.  I've been out sick for a couple days here and am
> > just now catching up.  I've read through the last week's
> > worth of mail here now, so let me see if I have properly
> > summarized where things stand and what's needed for the DTC:
> > 
> > These patches need to be applied:
> > 
> >     [PATCH dtc] Add -o <output file> to the usage message.
> >     Sat, 14 Apr 2007 18:16:47 -0400
> > 
> >     [PATCH dtc take 3] Fix reserve map output for asm format.
> >     Tue, 17 Apr 2007 18:14:41 -0400
> > 
> >     [PATCH: dtc take 2] Assemble the blob in memory before writing it out.
> >     Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:59:51 -0400
> > 
> > The last patch there replaces the "Improve -S handling" patches.
> > But does the last patch replace or depend on the second one?
> > 
> > And I agree with David that last patch is a better approach.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > jdl
> 
> Yes, you have that right.

Good.  The drugs aren't too strong yet. :-)

> Patch #1 is good to go
>    [PATCH dtc] Add -o <output file> to the usage message.
>    Sat, 14 Apr 2007 18:16:47 -0400
> 
> Patch #2 and #3...
>    [PATCH dtc take 3] Fix reserve map output for asm format.
>    Tue, 17 Apr 2007 18:14:41 -0400
>    [PATCH: dtc take 2] Assemble the blob in memory before writing it out.
>    Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:59:51 -0400
> 
> ...you force me to make a confession.

It's good for the soul. :-)


> Your option:
> 1) Take the last two patches as is and remove the fprintf yourself
> 2) I'll fix it tonight and provide a New Improved patch

I'll go with Door Number 1!  No problem.

Thanks,
jdl

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-19 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-19  1:59 [PATCH: dtc take 2] Assemble the blob in memory before writing it out Jerry Van Baren
2007-04-19  2:05 ` David Gibson
2007-04-19  2:05   ` [U-Boot-Users] " David Gibson
2007-04-19 18:27 ` Jon Loeliger
2007-04-19 18:27   ` [U-Boot-Users] " Jon Loeliger
2007-04-19 18:49   ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-04-19 18:49     ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-04-19 19:03     ` Jon Loeliger [this message]
2007-04-19 19:03       ` Jon Loeliger
2007-04-19 22:31     ` Jon Loeliger
2007-04-19 22:31       ` Jon Loeliger
2007-04-19 23:45       ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-04-19 23:45         ` Jerry Van Baren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1177009395.14328.29.camel@ld0161-tx32 \
    --to=jdl@freescale.com \
    --cc=gerald.vanbaren@smiths-aerospace.com \
    --cc=jdl@jdl.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.