From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Holger Schurig <hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mac80211 regression: doesn't associate automatically
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:46:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1195821998.4149.113.camel@johannes.berg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711221719.40412.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1550 bytes --]
> So, things brings me to a weird conclusion:
>
> a) earlier you said that in WEXT, the only command that is
> defined to get you an association is the "iwconfig XXX ap YYY"
> command.
Yes, but you're assuming "YYY" is a MAC address while in fact it can
have two special meanings, "any" and "off", see the iwconfig man page.
> If I accept both sentences as valid, I must conclude that
> mac80211 is faulty. It happens that mac80211 triggers an
> association to an access-point also by the "iwconfig XXX essid
> YYYY" command. This is not defined. Hey, wait a minute. mac80211
> is not allowed to do ANYTHING that is undefined, because tools
> can only rely on defined things. So mac80211 is faulty. Crap,
> ditch it.
Nope, this isn't what I said either. You've (I guess intentionally or by
just being too set into your line of thinking and not accepting any of
my arguments) managed to misunderstand me *COMPLETELY*.
You said, paraphrasing: I have a mac80211 _bug_, it's crap because it
doesn't support this use case I dug out and that happens to work with
some other drivers.
I said: It's not a bug.
You understood: Johannes hates me, he thinks mac80211 is buggy, and he
also thinks mac80211 should only do what he thinks wext defines.
See?
I wouldn't even object to making mac80211 try to associate when a key is
set, if you can make a clean enough patch (which I doubt). I do object
to calling this a bug because it's not, it's in line with what wext
users can rightfully expect.
johannes
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-23 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-22 8:12 mac80211 regression: doesn't associate automatically Holger Schurig
2007-11-22 13:05 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-22 13:26 ` John W. Linville
2007-11-23 0:23 ` Pavel Roskin
[not found] ` <47462A72.8010303@wetwork.net>
2007-11-23 1:26 ` Pavel Roskin
2007-11-23 8:06 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-23 8:22 ` Pavel Roskin
2007-11-23 9:03 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-26 15:34 ` Dan Williams
2007-11-22 14:14 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-22 14:41 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-22 15:05 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-22 15:13 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-22 15:43 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-22 15:41 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-22 15:46 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-22 15:58 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-23 12:15 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-22 16:19 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-22 20:32 ` Will Dyson
2007-11-23 8:44 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-23 12:48 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-23 19:34 ` Will Dyson
2007-11-23 20:22 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-23 12:46 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2007-11-23 13:23 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-24 21:36 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-24 22:39 ` Will Dyson
2007-11-25 10:53 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-26 7:27 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-22 15:45 ` Holger Schurig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1195821998.4149.113.camel@johannes.berg \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.