From: Holger Schurig <hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: mac80211 regression: doesn't associate automatically
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 10:03:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711231003.03982.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1195806137.12961.9.camel@dv>
> Orinoco relies on roaming in the firmware
And wlags_h1_cs/wlags_h2_cs as well.
libertas_cs has half-baked roaming in firmware and in
kernel-space, doesn't work very well so far.
Madwifi has code coarse code roaming in the BSD borrowed
ieee80211 code. It roams only when it lost the association to
the current AP. But before doing that, it went with it's rate
down to 1 MBit/s, even when there's a better AP nearby that it
could use with 11 MBit/s or higher.
There is code in it which is disabled via "if (0 || ...)" that
allows for a much smoother roaming, e.g. to scan when the RSSI
drops below a certain level. Once enabled and after tuning of
some timeout variables, that roaming code works extremely well.
Both in a WEP-mode without wpa_supplicant and in WPA/WPA2 mode
with wpa_supplicant.
> wpa_supplicant gives you roaming in the userspace.
Yeah, I thought in this lines as well. I have no problem putting
wpa_supplicant on my embedded targets. In fact, it's already
there, it's currently just used for WPA, not for WEP. However,
if suddenly NetworkManager would be needed for roaming, then
from an embedded-usage point of view I wouldn't like that.
I just don't know how good it's roaming code is, e.g. can it
start to scan for something better if the RSSI drops below some
threshold? Does it have a good picture of the ever changing
situation of AP's signal strength? This I need to find out :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-23 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-22 8:12 mac80211 regression: doesn't associate automatically Holger Schurig
2007-11-22 13:05 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-22 13:26 ` John W. Linville
2007-11-23 0:23 ` Pavel Roskin
[not found] ` <47462A72.8010303@wetwork.net>
2007-11-23 1:26 ` Pavel Roskin
2007-11-23 8:06 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-23 8:22 ` Pavel Roskin
2007-11-23 9:03 ` Holger Schurig [this message]
2007-11-26 15:34 ` Dan Williams
2007-11-22 14:14 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-22 14:41 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-22 15:05 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-22 15:13 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-22 15:43 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-22 15:41 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-22 15:46 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-22 15:58 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-23 12:15 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-22 16:19 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-22 20:32 ` Will Dyson
2007-11-23 8:44 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-23 12:48 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-23 19:34 ` Will Dyson
2007-11-23 20:22 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-23 12:46 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-23 13:23 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-24 21:36 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-24 22:39 ` Will Dyson
2007-11-25 10:53 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-26 7:27 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-22 15:45 ` Holger Schurig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200711231003.03982.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de \
--to=hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=proski@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.