From: Holger Schurig <hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mac80211 regression: doesn't associate automatically
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:06:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711230906.10441.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1195777405.11966.12.camel@dv>
> I think setting the key should not cause reassociation if
> there is an association.
That seems sensible.
I actually think that while it's not associated, it should
periodically try to associcate with what's currently defined
(e.g. ESSID, fixed AP mac, key settings etc).
Currently, if I do the following with mac80211/b43:
$ # turn AP off or move into an area where you can't
receive the AP
$ pccardctl insert
$ ifconfig eth1 up
$ iwconfig eth1 key s:11111
$ iwconfig eth1 essid MUMBLFUTZ
$ # turn AP on or move with the laptop/device into the
vincinity of an AP
... then I won't get an association at all.
Other drivers that I used in production during the last 5 years
didn't show that behavior (orinoco_cs, wlags_h1_cs, wlags_h2_cs,
madwifi). They associated on their own.
However, as mac80211 is currently implemented, it assumes
a "stationary" WLAN setup and doesn't cope well with scenarios
where devices move. If it would cope better with such
situations, then it would also cope with the first problem I
reported. Because if it would periodically re-scan and try to
associate, a later submitted or changed WEP key would be taken
into account and association would have succeeded.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-23 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-22 8:12 mac80211 regression: doesn't associate automatically Holger Schurig
2007-11-22 13:05 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-22 13:26 ` John W. Linville
2007-11-23 0:23 ` Pavel Roskin
[not found] ` <47462A72.8010303@wetwork.net>
2007-11-23 1:26 ` Pavel Roskin
2007-11-23 8:06 ` Holger Schurig [this message]
2007-11-23 8:22 ` Pavel Roskin
2007-11-23 9:03 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-26 15:34 ` Dan Williams
2007-11-22 14:14 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-22 14:41 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-22 15:05 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-22 15:13 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-22 15:43 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-22 15:41 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-22 15:46 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-22 15:58 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-23 12:15 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-22 16:19 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-22 20:32 ` Will Dyson
2007-11-23 8:44 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-23 12:48 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-23 19:34 ` Will Dyson
2007-11-23 20:22 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-23 12:46 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-23 13:23 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-24 21:36 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-24 22:39 ` Will Dyson
2007-11-25 10:53 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-26 7:27 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-22 15:45 ` Holger Schurig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200711230906.10441.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de \
--to=hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.