[kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH] Add powerpc dcr callbacks to kvm callback

[kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH] Add powerpc dcr callbacks to kvm callback

[Jerone Young]

# HG changeset patch
# User Jerone Young <jyoung5@us.ibm.com>
# Date 1199305658 21600
# Node ID bf828ac70dde1dfa4f67e4774a884669306423e6
# Parent  8161d444f7c37be9bdbfaac338d58301b00f2961
Add powerpc dcr callbacks to kvm callback structrure

This patch adds dcr call back function to the kvm callback structure
for powerpc.

This patch accidently was not submitted with the last patch.

Signed-off-by: Jerone Young <jyoung5@us.ibm.com>

diff --git a/libkvm/libkvm.h b/libkvm/libkvm.h
--- a/libkvm/libkvm.h
+++ b/libkvm/libkvm.h
@@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ struct kvm_callbacks {
     void (*post_kvm_run)(void *opaque, int vcpu);
     int (*pre_kvm_run)(void *opaque, int vcpu);
     int (*tpr_access)(void *opaque, int vcpu, uint64_t rip, int is_write);
+#if defined(__powerpc__)
+    int (*powerpc_dcr_read)(kvm_context_t kvm, uint32_t dcrn, uint32_t *data);
+    int (*powerpc_dcr_write)(kvm_context_t kvm, uint32_t dcrn, uint32_t data);
+#endif
 };
 
 /*!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-ppc-devel mailing list
kvm-ppc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-ppc-devel

[PATCH] Add powerpc dcr callbacks to kvm callback structrure

[Jerone Young]

# HG changeset patch
# User Jerone Young <jyoung5-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
# Date 1199305658 21600
# Node ID bf828ac70dde1dfa4f67e4774a884669306423e6
# Parent  8161d444f7c37be9bdbfaac338d58301b00f2961
Add powerpc dcr callbacks to kvm callback structrure

This patch adds dcr call back function to the kvm callback structure
for powerpc.

This patch accidently was not submitted with the last patch.

Signed-off-by: Jerone Young <jyoung5-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

diff --git a/libkvm/libkvm.h b/libkvm/libkvm.h
--- a/libkvm/libkvm.h
+++ b/libkvm/libkvm.h
@@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ struct kvm_callbacks {
     void (*post_kvm_run)(void *opaque, int vcpu);
     int (*pre_kvm_run)(void *opaque, int vcpu);
     int (*tpr_access)(void *opaque, int vcpu, uint64_t rip, int is_write);
+#if defined(__powerpc__)
+    int (*powerpc_dcr_read)(kvm_context_t kvm, uint32_t dcrn, uint32_t *data);
+    int (*powerpc_dcr_write)(kvm_context_t kvm, uint32_t dcrn, uint32_t data);
+#endif
 };
 
 /*!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

Re: [kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH] Add powerpc dcr callbacks to

[Hollis Blanchard]

What is the plan here, to ifdef the arch-specific callbacks? If so,
'tpr_access' is an obvious candidate...

-- 
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center

On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 14:29 -0600, Jerone Young wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Jerone Young <jyoung5@us.ibm.com>
> # Date 1199305658 21600
> # Node ID bf828ac70dde1dfa4f67e4774a884669306423e6
> # Parent  8161d444f7c37be9bdbfaac338d58301b00f2961
> Add powerpc dcr callbacks to kvm callback structrure
> 
> This patch adds dcr call back function to the kvm callback structure
> for powerpc.
> 
> This patch accidently was not submitted with the last patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jerone Young <jyoung5@us.ibm.com>
> 
> diff --git a/libkvm/libkvm.h b/libkvm/libkvm.h
> --- a/libkvm/libkvm.h
> +++ b/libkvm/libkvm.h
> @@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ struct kvm_callbacks {
>      void (*post_kvm_run)(void *opaque, int vcpu);
>      int (*pre_kvm_run)(void *opaque, int vcpu);
>      int (*tpr_access)(void *opaque, int vcpu, uint64_t rip, int is_write);
> +#if defined(__powerpc__)
> +    int (*powerpc_dcr_read)(kvm_context_t kvm, uint32_t dcrn, uint32_t *data);
> +    int (*powerpc_dcr_write)(kvm_context_t kvm, uint32_t dcrn, uint32_t data);
> +#endif
>  };
> 
>  /*!
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> kvm-ppc-devel mailing list
> kvm-ppc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-ppc-devel


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-ppc-devel mailing list
kvm-ppc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-ppc-devel

Re: [kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH] Add powerpc dcr callbacks to kvm callback structrure

[Hollis Blanchard]

What is the plan here, to ifdef the arch-specific callbacks? If so,
'tpr_access' is an obvious candidate...

-- 
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center

On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 14:29 -0600, Jerone Young wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Jerone Young <jyoung5-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> # Date 1199305658 21600
> # Node ID bf828ac70dde1dfa4f67e4774a884669306423e6
> # Parent  8161d444f7c37be9bdbfaac338d58301b00f2961
> Add powerpc dcr callbacks to kvm callback structrure
> 
> This patch adds dcr call back function to the kvm callback structure
> for powerpc.
> 
> This patch accidently was not submitted with the last patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jerone Young <jyoung5-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> 
> diff --git a/libkvm/libkvm.h b/libkvm/libkvm.h
> --- a/libkvm/libkvm.h
> +++ b/libkvm/libkvm.h
> @@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ struct kvm_callbacks {
>      void (*post_kvm_run)(void *opaque, int vcpu);
>      int (*pre_kvm_run)(void *opaque, int vcpu);
>      int (*tpr_access)(void *opaque, int vcpu, uint64_t rip, int is_write);
> +#if defined(__powerpc__)
> +    int (*powerpc_dcr_read)(kvm_context_t kvm, uint32_t dcrn, uint32_t *data);
> +    int (*powerpc_dcr_write)(kvm_context_t kvm, uint32_t dcrn, uint32_t data);
> +#endif
>  };
> 
>  /*!
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> kvm-ppc-devel mailing list
> kvm-ppc-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-ppc-devel


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

Re: [kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH] Add powerpc dcr callbacks to

[Jerone Young]

That would be my sketchy idea. Though I was going to wait and see what
the feedback would be doing this :-) It can go either way. Since it's
just callbacks it really doesn't matter. But it does affect the
structure size never the less. 

So what are everyone thoughs about arch specific callbacks ?

On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 14:47 -0600, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> What is the plan here, to ifdef the arch-specific callbacks? If so,
> 'tpr_access' is an obvious candidate...
> 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-ppc-devel mailing list
kvm-ppc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-ppc-devel

Re: [kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH] Add powerpc dcr callbacks to kvm callback structrure

[Jerone Young]

That would be my sketchy idea. Though I was going to wait and see what
the feedback would be doing this :-) It can go either way. Since it's
just callbacks it really doesn't matter. But it does affect the
structure size never the less. 

So what are everyone thoughs about arch specific callbacks ?

On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 14:47 -0600, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> What is the plan here, to ifdef the arch-specific callbacks? If so,
> 'tpr_access' is an obvious candidate...
> 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

Re: [kvm-ppc-devel] [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Add powerpc dcr callbacks

[Avi Kivity]

Jerone Young wrote:
> That would be my sketchy idea. Though I was going to wait and see what
> the feedback would be doing this :-) It can go either way. Since it's
> just callbacks it really doesn't matter. But it does affect the
> structure size never the less. 
>
> So what are everyone thoughs about arch specific callbacks ?
>   

#ifdefs are fine, if only for documenting which tla belongs to which 
arch.  Actual runtime savings are probably negligible.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-ppc-devel mailing list
kvm-ppc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-ppc-devel

Re: [kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH] Add powerpc dcr callbacks to kvm callback structrure

[Avi Kivity]

Jerone Young wrote:
> That would be my sketchy idea. Though I was going to wait and see what
> the feedback would be doing this :-) It can go either way. Since it's
> just callbacks it really doesn't matter. But it does affect the
> structure size never the less. 
>
> So what are everyone thoughs about arch specific callbacks ?
>   

#ifdefs are fine, if only for documenting which tla belongs to which 
arch.  Actual runtime savings are probably negligible.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/