All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: stefan@agner.ch (Stefan Agner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: no irq domain found for ... a GPIO interrupt controller
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:13:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <11a0b1f5808af5bdabaab657366918d4@agner.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160218091432.6968b836@arm.com>

Hi Marc,

On 2016-02-18 01:14, Marc Zyngier wrote:
<snip>
> What your stack trace shows is that the failure occurs at boot time,
> when of_platform_populate() parses the DT and creates the platform
> devices. As part of this process, it tries to resolves the interrupt
> specifiers, but fails to do so for this particular device, since the
> corresponding irqchip and domain have not been created yet (the GPIO
> controller is itself a device, while other irqchips are not).
> 
> But as long as your device driver uses platform_get_irq(), you will
> force the interrupt specifier to be evaluated again, this time giving
> you a valid interrupt (and provided that your GPIO driver has
> initialized in the meantime - check for -EPROBE_DEFER). At some point,
> we'll be able to kill the interrupt resolution from
> of_platform_populate().

The device driver is using platform_get_irq. However, I think it
currently would not handle EPROBE_DEFER right, but seems also not to
happen in practice...

> 
> To summarize, your driver not working may not be related to this issue.

So this means that despite the warning, nothing I really need to worry
right? Does this warning will go away in the future?

--
Stefan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: jiang.liu@linux.intel.com,
	Sanchayan Maity <maitysanchayan@gmail.com>,
	robh@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: no irq domain found for ... a GPIO interrupt controller
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:13:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <11a0b1f5808af5bdabaab657366918d4@agner.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160218091432.6968b836@arm.com>

Hi Marc,

On 2016-02-18 01:14, Marc Zyngier wrote:
<snip>
> What your stack trace shows is that the failure occurs at boot time,
> when of_platform_populate() parses the DT and creates the platform
> devices. As part of this process, it tries to resolves the interrupt
> specifiers, but fails to do so for this particular device, since the
> corresponding irqchip and domain have not been created yet (the GPIO
> controller is itself a device, while other irqchips are not).
> 
> But as long as your device driver uses platform_get_irq(), you will
> force the interrupt specifier to be evaluated again, this time giving
> you a valid interrupt (and provided that your GPIO driver has
> initialized in the meantime - check for -EPROBE_DEFER). At some point,
> we'll be able to kill the interrupt resolution from
> of_platform_populate().

The device driver is using platform_get_irq. However, I think it
currently would not handle EPROBE_DEFER right, but seems also not to
happen in practice...

> 
> To summarize, your driver not working may not be related to this issue.

So this means that despite the warning, nothing I really need to worry
right? Does this warning will go away in the future?

--
Stefan

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-18 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-17 23:29 no irq domain found for ... a GPIO interrupt controller Stefan Agner
2016-02-17 23:29 ` Stefan Agner
2016-02-18  9:14 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-18  9:14   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-18 16:13   ` Stefan Agner [this message]
2016-02-18 16:13     ` Stefan Agner
2016-02-18 16:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-18 16:43       ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=11a0b1f5808af5bdabaab657366918d4@agner.ch \
    --to=stefan@agner.ch \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.