From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: travis@sgi.com,
Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] s390: Use generic percpu linux-2.6.git
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:32:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1201768346.18221.5.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080130215339.GC28242@elte.hu>
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 22:53 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * travis@sgi.com <travis@sgi.com> wrote:
>
> > Change s390 percpu.h to use asm-generic/percpu.h
>
> do the s390 maintainer agree with this change (Acks please), and has it
> been tested on s390?
Now I'm confused. The patch has been acked a few weeks ago and the last
5+ version of the patch had the acked line. The lastest version dropped
it for a reason I don't know. And more, the patch is already upstream
with the (correct) acked line, see git commit
f034347470e486835ccdcd7a5bb2ceb417be11c4.
So, what is the problem ?
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: travis@sgi.com,
Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] s390: Use generic percpu linux-2.6.git
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:32:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1201768346.18221.5.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080130215339.GC28242@elte.hu>
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 22:53 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * travis@sgi.com <travis@sgi.com> wrote:
>
> > Change s390 percpu.h to use asm-generic/percpu.h
>
> do the s390 maintainer agree with this change (Acks please), and has it
> been tested on s390?
Now I'm confused. The patch has been acked a few weeks ago and the last
5+ version of the patch had the acked line. The lastest version dropped
it for a reason I don't know. And more, the patch is already upstream
with the (correct) acked line, see git commit
f034347470e486835ccdcd7a5bb2ceb417be11c4.
So, what is the problem ?
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-31 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-30 18:09 [PATCH 0/6] percpu: Per cpu code simplification linux-2.6.git travis
2008-01-30 18:09 ` travis
2008-01-30 18:09 ` [PATCH 1/6] modules: Fold percpu_modcopy into module.c linux-2.6.git travis
2008-01-30 18:09 ` travis
2008-01-30 18:09 ` travis
2008-01-30 18:09 ` travis
2008-01-30 18:09 ` [PATCH 2/6] percpu: Change Kconfig to HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA linux-2.6.git travis
2008-01-30 18:09 ` travis
2008-01-30 18:09 ` travis
2008-01-30 18:09 ` travis
2008-01-30 21:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] percpu: Change Kconfig to HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA Ingo Molnar
2008-01-30 21:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] percpu: Change Kconfig to HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA linux-2.6.git Ingo Molnar
2008-01-30 21:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-30 21:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-30 21:57 ` [PATCH 2/6] percpu: Change Kconfig to HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA Mike Travis
2008-01-30 21:57 ` [PATCH 2/6] percpu: Change Kconfig to HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA linux-2.6.git Mike Travis
2008-01-30 21:57 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-30 21:57 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-30 18:09 ` [PATCH 3/6] sparc64: Use generic percpu linux-2.6.git travis
2008-01-30 18:09 ` travis
2008-01-30 21:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-30 21:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-31 1:03 ` David Miller
2008-01-31 1:03 ` David Miller, Ingo Molnar
2008-01-30 18:09 ` [PATCH 4/6] ia64: " travis
2008-01-30 18:09 ` travis
2008-01-30 18:09 ` travis
2008-01-30 18:09 ` [PATCH 5/6] powerpc: Use generic per cpu linux-2.6.git travis
2008-01-30 18:09 ` travis
2008-01-30 18:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-30 18:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-30 18:38 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-30 18:38 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-30 18:09 ` [PATCH 6/6] s390: Use generic percpu linux-2.6.git travis
2008-01-30 18:09 ` travis
2008-01-30 21:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-30 21:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-31 8:32 ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2008-01-31 8:32 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2008-01-31 8:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-31 8:50 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1201768346.18221.5.camel@localhost \
--to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.