From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, seraph@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 09:11:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1207059115.3100.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080401011518.eb683cff.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 01:15 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
> bugzilla web interface).
> > Steps to reproduce:
> >
> > Let udev load sym53c8xx in kernel 2.6.23 or newer.
>
> urgh. Perhaps it's related to platform IRQ routing or something.
>
> I'd suggest that the next step would be to send us the `dmesg -s 1000000'
> output for both good and bad kernels. A comparison might show where things
> went bad.
Yes, that would be my guess too ... although I don't see anything amiss
in the dmesg I note you have two ethernet interfaces:
eth0: Sun GEM (PCI) 10/100/1000BaseT Ethernet 00:03:ba:08:61:7c
eth1394: eth1: IPv4 over IEEE 1394 (fw-host0)
I'm assuming eth0 is the problem?
Could you also send us the output of /proc/interrupts, /proc/iomem
and /proc/ioports just to see if we have a problem. Also, if eth0 is on
its own interrupt line, does the interrupt count rise even while the
interface is non functional?
Thanks,
James
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, seraph@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:11:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1207059115.3100.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080401011518.eb683cff.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 01:15 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
> bugzilla web interface).
> > Steps to reproduce:
> >
> > Let udev load sym53c8xx in kernel 2.6.23 or newer.
>
> urgh. Perhaps it's related to platform IRQ routing or something.
>
> I'd suggest that the next step would be to send us the `dmesg -s 1000000'
> output for both good and bad kernels. A comparison might show where things
> went bad.
Yes, that would be my guess too ... although I don't see anything amiss
in the dmesg I note you have two ethernet interfaces:
eth0: Sun GEM (PCI) 10/100/1000BaseT Ethernet 00:03:ba:08:61:7c
eth1394: eth1: IPv4 over IEEE 1394 (fw-host0)
I'm assuming eth0 is the problem?
Could you also send us the output of /proc/interrupts, /proc/iomem
and /proc/ioports just to see if we have a problem. Also, if eth0 is on
its own interrupt line, does the interrupt count rise even while the
interface is non functional?
Thanks,
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-01 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-10374-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2008-04-01 8:15 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev Andrew Morton
2008-04-01 8:15 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with Andrew Morton
2008-04-01 8:58 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev Jos van der Ende
2008-04-01 8:58 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with Jos van der Ende
2008-04-01 14:11 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2008-04-01 14:11 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-01 14:47 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev Jos van der Ende
2008-04-01 14:47 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with Jos van der Ende
2008-04-01 19:05 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev Jos van der Ende
2008-04-01 19:05 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with Jos van der Ende
2008-04-01 20:19 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev James Bottomley
2008-04-01 20:19 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with James Bottomley
2008-04-01 20:57 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev Jos van der Ende
2008-04-01 20:57 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with Jos van der Ende
2008-04-01 21:14 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev James Bottomley
2008-04-01 21:14 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with James Bottomley
2008-04-01 22:30 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev Jos van der Ende
2008-04-01 22:30 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with Jos van der Ende
2008-04-02 10:29 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev Jos van der Ende
2008-04-02 10:29 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with Jos van der Ende
2008-04-02 12:06 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-02 12:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-02 14:09 ` Jos van der Ende
2008-04-02 14:09 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with Jos van der Ende
2008-04-02 15:49 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev James Bottomley
2008-04-02 15:49 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with James Bottomley
2008-04-02 16:06 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev Jos van der Ende
2008-04-02 16:06 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with Jos van der Ende
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1207059115.3100.9.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seraph@xs4all.nl \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.