From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Jos van der Ende <seraph@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:14:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1207084454.3100.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080401225717.7d936f91.seraph@xs4all.nl>
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 22:57 +0200, Jos van der Ende wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:19:29 -0500
> James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> wrote:
>
> > That's odd ... it's behaving like a resource conflict. However, the
> > ports and interrupt trace didn't betray anything. What does lspci -vv
> > say for each of the devices?
>
> Output from lspci -vv attached.
Thanks ... unfortunately looks normal too. The gem has a single memory
region; the sym2 has 2 mem and one IO region, all of which show up in
the /proc/iomem|ports.
> > Also, if you remove the sym2 module in the
> > problem case, does the sungem come back to life?
>
> No, once it is hosed it stays hosed until the next boot. Fiddling with the wrong ioports maybe?
Yes ... that's what I guess. Just as one last grasp at a straw, is
there any difference in /proc/iomem or /proc/ioports for the working
case (sungem loaded first followed by sym2)?
> > I'm afraid I can't see anything relevant looking over the sym2 changes,
> > so you might need to bisect this to identify the culprit.
>
> Working on that, but it is a hassle as this bitty-box needs some time to compile a kernel. 2.6.23-rc1 didn't boot, for starters.
Sorry ... can't think of much else that will help.
James
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Jos van der Ende <seraph@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:14:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1207084454.3100.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080401225717.7d936f91.seraph@xs4all.nl>
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 22:57 +0200, Jos van der Ende wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:19:29 -0500
> James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> wrote:
>
> > That's odd ... it's behaving like a resource conflict. However, the
> > ports and interrupt trace didn't betray anything. What does lspci -vv
> > say for each of the devices?
>
> Output from lspci -vv attached.
Thanks ... unfortunately looks normal too. The gem has a single memory
region; the sym2 has 2 mem and one IO region, all of which show up in
the /proc/iomem|ports.
> > Also, if you remove the sym2 module in the
> > problem case, does the sungem come back to life?
>
> No, once it is hosed it stays hosed until the next boot. Fiddling with the wrong ioports maybe?
Yes ... that's what I guess. Just as one last grasp at a straw, is
there any difference in /proc/iomem or /proc/ioports for the working
case (sungem loaded first followed by sym2)?
> > I'm afraid I can't see anything relevant looking over the sym2 changes,
> > so you might need to bisect this to identify the culprit.
>
> Working on that, but it is a hassle as this bitty-box needs some time to compile a kernel. 2.6.23-rc1 didn't boot, for starters.
Sorry ... can't think of much else that will help.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-01 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-10374-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2008-04-01 8:15 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev Andrew Morton
2008-04-01 8:15 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with Andrew Morton
2008-04-01 8:58 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev Jos van der Ende
2008-04-01 8:58 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with Jos van der Ende
2008-04-01 14:11 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev James Bottomley
2008-04-01 14:11 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with James Bottomley
2008-04-01 14:47 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev Jos van der Ende
2008-04-01 14:47 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with Jos van der Ende
2008-04-01 19:05 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev Jos van der Ende
2008-04-01 19:05 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with Jos van der Ende
2008-04-01 20:19 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev James Bottomley
2008-04-01 20:19 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with James Bottomley
2008-04-01 20:57 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev Jos van der Ende
2008-04-01 20:57 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with Jos van der Ende
2008-04-01 21:14 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2008-04-01 21:14 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-01 22:30 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev Jos van der Ende
2008-04-01 22:30 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with Jos van der Ende
2008-04-02 10:29 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev Jos van der Ende
2008-04-02 10:29 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with Jos van der Ende
2008-04-02 12:06 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-02 12:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-02 14:09 ` Jos van der Ende
2008-04-02 14:09 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with Jos van der Ende
2008-04-02 15:49 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev James Bottomley
2008-04-02 15:49 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with James Bottomley
2008-04-02 16:06 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev Jos van der Ende
2008-04-02 16:06 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with Jos van der Ende
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1207084454.3100.31.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seraph@xs4all.nl \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.