From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] take pageout refcount into account for remove_exclusive_swap_page
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 13:43:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1210700635.6208.40.camel@lts-notebook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080513120417.0833cec1@cuia.bos.redhat.com>
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 12:04 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> The pageout code takes a reference count to the page, which means
> that remove_exclusive_swap_page (when called from the pageout code)
> needs to take that extra refcount into account for mapped pages.
>
> Introduces a remove_exclusive_swap_page_ref function to avoid
> exposing too much magic to the rest of the VM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> Debugged-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
>
> ---
> Daisuke: thank you for pointing out the problem. Does this patch look like
> a reasonable fix to you?
>
> Andrew: this patch is incremental to my patch
> "[PATCH -mm 05/15] free swap space on swap-in/activation"
>
>
> Index: linux-2.6.25-mm1/mm/vmscan.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.25-mm1.orig/mm/vmscan.c 2008-05-13 11:59:34.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.25-mm1/mm/vmscan.c 2008-05-13 11:54:03.000000000 -0400
> @@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ free_it:
> activate_locked:
> /* Not a candidate for swapping, so reclaim swap space. */
> if (PageSwapCache(page) && vm_swap_full())
> - remove_exclusive_swap_page(page);
> + remove_exclusive_swap_page_ref(page);
> SetPageActive(page);
> pgactivate++;
> keep_locked:
> Index: linux-2.6.25-mm1/mm/swap.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.25-mm1.orig/mm/swap.c 2008-05-13 11:59:34.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.25-mm1/mm/swap.c 2008-05-13 11:53:47.000000000 -0400
> @@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ void pagevec_swap_free(struct pagevec *p
>
> if (PageSwapCache(page) && !TestSetPageLocked(page)) {
> if (PageSwapCache(page))
> - remove_exclusive_swap_page(page);
> + remove_exclusive_swap_page_ref(page);
> unlock_page(page);
> }
> }
> Index: linux-2.6.25-mm1/include/linux/swap.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.25-mm1.orig/include/linux/swap.h 2008-05-13 11:20:46.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.25-mm1/include/linux/swap.h 2008-05-13 11:47:31.000000000 -0400
> @@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ extern sector_t swapdev_block(int, pgoff
> extern struct swap_info_struct *get_swap_info_struct(unsigned);
> extern int can_share_swap_page(struct page *);
> extern int remove_exclusive_swap_page(struct page *);
> +extern int remove_exclusive_swap_page_ref(struct page *);
> struct backing_dev_info;
>
> extern spinlock_t swap_lock;
> Index: linux-2.6.25-mm1/mm/swapfile.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.25-mm1.orig/mm/swapfile.c 2008-04-22 10:33:45.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.25-mm1/mm/swapfile.c 2008-05-13 11:53:32.000000000 -0400
> @@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ int can_share_swap_page(struct page *pag
> * Work out if there are any other processes sharing this
> * swap cache page. Free it if you can. Return success.
> */
> -int remove_exclusive_swap_page(struct page *page)
> +static int remove_exclusive_swap_page_count(struct page *page, int count)
> {
> int retval;
> struct swap_info_struct * p;
> @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ int remove_exclusive_swap_page(struct pa
> return 0;
> if (PageWriteback(page))
> return 0;
> - if (page_count(page) != 2) /* 2: us + cache */
> + if (page_count(page) != count) /* 2: us + cache */
Maybe change comment to "/* count: us + ptes + cache */" ???
> return 0;
>
> entry.val = page_private(page);
> @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ int remove_exclusive_swap_page(struct pa
> if (p->swap_map[swp_offset(entry)] == 1) {
> /* Recheck the page count with the swapcache lock held.. */
> write_lock_irq(&swapper_space.tree_lock);
> - if ((page_count(page) == 2) && !PageWriteback(page)) {
> + if ((page_count(page) == count) && !PageWriteback(page)) {
> __delete_from_swap_cache(page);
> SetPageDirty(page);
> retval = 1;
> @@ -387,6 +387,25 @@ int remove_exclusive_swap_page(struct pa
> }
>
> /*
> + * Most of the time the page should have two references: one for the
> + * process and one for the swap cache.
> + */
> +int remove_exclusive_swap_page(struct page *page)
> +{
> + return remove_exclusive_swap_page_count(page, 2);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * The pageout code holds an extra reference to the page. That raises
> + * the reference count to test for to 2 for a page that is only in the
> + * swap cache and 3 for a page that is mapped by a process.
Or, more generally, 2 + N, for an anon page that is mapped [must be
read-only, right?] by N processes. This can happen after, e.g., fork().
Looks like this patch handles the condition just fine, but you might
want to reflect this in the comment.
Now, I think I can use this to try to remove anon pages from the swap
cache when they're mlocked.
> + */
> +int remove_exclusive_swap_page_ref(struct page *page)
> +{
> + return remove_exclusive_swap_page_count(page, 2 + page_mapped(page));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> * Free the swap entry like above, but also try to
> * free the page cache entry if it is the last user.
> */
>
> All Rights Reversed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-13 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-28 18:18 [PATCH -mm 00/15] VM pageout scalability improvements (V6) Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 01/15] FYI: vmstats are "off-by-one" Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 02/15] move isolate_lru_page() to vmscan.c Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 03/15] Use an indexed array for LRU variables Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 04/15] use an array for the LRU pagevecs Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 05/15] free swap space on swap-in/activation Rik van Riel
2008-05-12 11:21 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-12 13:33 ` Rik van Riel
2008-05-13 13:00 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-13 13:11 ` Rik van Riel
2008-05-13 16:04 ` [PATCH] take pageout refcount into account for remove_exclusive_swap_page Rik van Riel
2008-05-13 17:43 ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2008-05-13 18:09 ` Rik van Riel
2008-05-13 19:02 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-05-15 2:15 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-15 17:55 ` Lee Schermerhorn
[not found] ` <1210600296.7300.23.camel@lts-notebook>
2008-05-13 12:39 ` [PATCH -mm 05/15] free swap space on swap-in/activation Daisuke Nishimura
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 06/15] define page_file_cache() function Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 07/15] split LRU lists into anon & file sets Rik van Riel
2008-05-10 7:50 ` MinChan Kim
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 08/15] SEQ replacement for anonymous pages Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 09/15] add some sanity checks to get_scan_ratio Rik van Riel
2008-05-15 6:34 ` MinChan Kim
2008-05-15 13:12 ` Rik van Riel
2008-05-16 6:42 ` MinChan Kim
2008-05-16 16:47 ` Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 10/15] add newly swapped in pages to the inactive list Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 11/15] more aggressively use lumpy reclaim Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 12/15] No Reclaim LRU Infrastructure Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 13/15] Non-reclaimable page statistics Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 14/15] ramfs pages are non-reclaimable Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 15/15] SHM_LOCKED pages are nonreclaimable Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 19:55 ` [PATCH -mm 00/15] VM pageout scalability improvements (V6) Rik van Riel
2008-05-08 4:54 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1210700635.6208.40.camel@lts-notebook \
--to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.