From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] take pageout refcount into account for remove_exclusive_swap_page
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 15:02:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1210705370.6208.47.camel@lts-notebook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080513140902.1030afaa@cuia.bos.redhat.com>
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 14:09 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2008 13:43:55 -0400
> Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com> wrote:
>
> > Or, more generally, 2 + N, for an anon page that is mapped [must be
> > read-only, right?] by N processes. This can happen after, e.g., fork().
> > Looks like this patch handles the condition just fine, but you might
> > want to reflect this in the comment.
>
> No, this patch only removes a page from the swap cache that is mapped
> by one process. The function page_mapped() returns either 1 or 0, not
> the same as page_mapcount().
Duh! I was reading "page_mapcount()", 'cause that's what I've been
considering using for this purpose.
>
> I am not sure if trying to handle swap cache pages that are mapped by
> multiple processes could get us into other corner cases and think that
> we should probably try to stick to the safe thing for now.
OK. I can test the more general case down the road.
>
> Besides, shouldn't anonymous shared pages be COW and relatively rare?
Well, all anon pages are shared right after fork(), right? They only
become private once they've been written to. I don't have a feel for
the relative numbers of shared anon vs COWed anon--either in general or
in the swap cache.
>
> > Now, I think I can use this to try to remove anon pages from the swap
> > cache when they're mlocked.
I suppose I can just go ahead and use this version with my stress load
and count the times when I could have freed the swap cache entry, but
didn't because it's mapped in multiple address spaces. Later ... :)
> >
> > > + */
> > > +int remove_exclusive_swap_page_ref(struct page *page)
> > > +{
> > > + return remove_exclusive_swap_page_count(page, 2 + page_mapped(page));
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > * Free the swap entry like above, but also try to
> > > * free the page cache entry if it is the last user.
> > > */
> > >
> > > All Rights Reversed
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-13 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-28 18:18 [PATCH -mm 00/15] VM pageout scalability improvements (V6) Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 01/15] FYI: vmstats are "off-by-one" Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 02/15] move isolate_lru_page() to vmscan.c Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 03/15] Use an indexed array for LRU variables Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 04/15] use an array for the LRU pagevecs Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 05/15] free swap space on swap-in/activation Rik van Riel
2008-05-12 11:21 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-12 13:33 ` Rik van Riel
2008-05-13 13:00 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-13 13:11 ` Rik van Riel
2008-05-13 16:04 ` [PATCH] take pageout refcount into account for remove_exclusive_swap_page Rik van Riel
2008-05-13 17:43 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-05-13 18:09 ` Rik van Riel
2008-05-13 19:02 ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2008-05-15 2:15 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-15 17:55 ` Lee Schermerhorn
[not found] ` <1210600296.7300.23.camel@lts-notebook>
2008-05-13 12:39 ` [PATCH -mm 05/15] free swap space on swap-in/activation Daisuke Nishimura
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 06/15] define page_file_cache() function Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 07/15] split LRU lists into anon & file sets Rik van Riel
2008-05-10 7:50 ` MinChan Kim
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 08/15] SEQ replacement for anonymous pages Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 09/15] add some sanity checks to get_scan_ratio Rik van Riel
2008-05-15 6:34 ` MinChan Kim
2008-05-15 13:12 ` Rik van Riel
2008-05-16 6:42 ` MinChan Kim
2008-05-16 16:47 ` Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 10/15] add newly swapped in pages to the inactive list Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 11/15] more aggressively use lumpy reclaim Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 12/15] No Reclaim LRU Infrastructure Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 13/15] Non-reclaimable page statistics Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 14/15] ramfs pages are non-reclaimable Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 15/15] SHM_LOCKED pages are nonreclaimable Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 19:55 ` [PATCH -mm 00/15] VM pageout scalability improvements (V6) Rik van Riel
2008-05-08 4:54 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1210705370.6208.47.camel@lts-notebook \
--to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.