From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 05/15] free swap space on swap-in/activation
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 20:21:32 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4828283C.4000803@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080428181852.620969450@redhat.com>
Hi.
I have a question about the intention of this patch.
I think all the remove_exclusive_swap_page() you have added
are called while the _count of the page is incremented by
__isolate_lru_page().
So, IMHO, swap caches that will be freed by this patch should have
page counts from __isolate_lru_page() and the swap cache itself.
They are different from, for example, those are freed by do_swap_page()
-> remove_exclusive_swap_page(), that is, swap caches
that have been just mapped and have page counts from
the process(only user of the page) and the swap cache itself.
So, the intention of this patch is
not to free a swap space of swap cache that has already swapped in
and only used one process as do_swap_page() does,
but to free a swap space that is only used as a swap cache
(not used by any processes), right?
Regards,
Daisuke Nishimura.
Rik van Riel wrote:
> Free swap cache entries when swapping in pages if vm_swap_full()
> [swap space > 1/2 used]. Uses new pagevec to reduce pressure
> on locks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
>
> Index: linux-2.6.25-mm1/mm/vmscan.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.25-mm1.orig/mm/vmscan.c 2008-04-24 10:46:43.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.25-mm1/mm/vmscan.c 2008-04-24 11:59:56.000000000 -0400
> @@ -619,6 +619,9 @@ free_it:
> continue;
>
> activate_locked:
> + /* Not a candidate for swapping, so reclaim swap space. */
> + if (PageSwapCache(page) && vm_swap_full())
> + remove_exclusive_swap_page(page);
> SetPageActive(page);
> pgactivate++;
> keep_locked:
> @@ -1203,6 +1206,8 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned
> __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE, pgmoved);
> pgmoved = 0;
> spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> + if (vm_swap_full())
> + pagevec_swap_free(&pvec);
> __pagevec_release(&pvec);
> spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> }
> @@ -1212,6 +1217,8 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned
> __count_zone_vm_events(PGREFILL, zone, pgscanned);
> __count_vm_events(PGDEACTIVATE, pgdeactivate);
> spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> + if (vm_swap_full())
> + pagevec_swap_free(&pvec);
>
> pagevec_release(&pvec);
> }
> Index: linux-2.6.25-mm1/mm/swap.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.25-mm1.orig/mm/swap.c 2008-04-24 11:59:51.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.25-mm1/mm/swap.c 2008-04-24 11:59:56.000000000 -0400
> @@ -443,6 +443,24 @@ void pagevec_strip(struct pagevec *pvec)
> }
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Try to free swap space from the pages in a pagevec
> + */
> +void pagevec_swap_free(struct pagevec *pvec)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < pagevec_count(pvec); i++) {
> + struct page *page = pvec->pages[i];
> +
> + if (PageSwapCache(page) && !TestSetPageLocked(page)) {
> + if (PageSwapCache(page))
> + remove_exclusive_swap_page(page);
> + unlock_page(page);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> /**
> * pagevec_lookup - gang pagecache lookup
> * @pvec: Where the resulting pages are placed
> Index: linux-2.6.25-mm1/include/linux/pagevec.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.25-mm1.orig/include/linux/pagevec.h 2008-04-24 11:59:51.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.25-mm1/include/linux/pagevec.h 2008-04-24 11:59:56.000000000 -0400
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ void __pagevec_release_nonlru(struct pag
> void __pagevec_free(struct pagevec *pvec);
> void ____pagevec_lru_add(struct pagevec *pvec, enum lru_list lru);
> void pagevec_strip(struct pagevec *pvec);
> +void pagevec_swap_free(struct pagevec *pvec);
> unsigned pagevec_lookup(struct pagevec *pvec, struct address_space *mapping,
> pgoff_t start, unsigned nr_pages);
> unsigned pagevec_lookup_tag(struct pagevec *pvec,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-12 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-28 18:18 [PATCH -mm 00/15] VM pageout scalability improvements (V6) Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 01/15] FYI: vmstats are "off-by-one" Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 02/15] move isolate_lru_page() to vmscan.c Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 03/15] Use an indexed array for LRU variables Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 04/15] use an array for the LRU pagevecs Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 05/15] free swap space on swap-in/activation Rik van Riel
2008-05-12 11:21 ` Daisuke Nishimura [this message]
2008-05-12 13:33 ` Rik van Riel
2008-05-13 13:00 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-13 13:11 ` Rik van Riel
2008-05-13 16:04 ` [PATCH] take pageout refcount into account for remove_exclusive_swap_page Rik van Riel
2008-05-13 17:43 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-05-13 18:09 ` Rik van Riel
2008-05-13 19:02 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-05-15 2:15 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-15 17:55 ` Lee Schermerhorn
[not found] ` <1210600296.7300.23.camel@lts-notebook>
2008-05-13 12:39 ` [PATCH -mm 05/15] free swap space on swap-in/activation Daisuke Nishimura
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 06/15] define page_file_cache() function Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 07/15] split LRU lists into anon & file sets Rik van Riel
2008-05-10 7:50 ` MinChan Kim
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 08/15] SEQ replacement for anonymous pages Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 09/15] add some sanity checks to get_scan_ratio Rik van Riel
2008-05-15 6:34 ` MinChan Kim
2008-05-15 13:12 ` Rik van Riel
2008-05-16 6:42 ` MinChan Kim
2008-05-16 16:47 ` Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 10/15] add newly swapped in pages to the inactive list Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 11/15] more aggressively use lumpy reclaim Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 12/15] No Reclaim LRU Infrastructure Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 13/15] Non-reclaimable page statistics Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 14/15] ramfs pages are non-reclaimable Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH -mm 15/15] SHM_LOCKED pages are nonreclaimable Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 18:18 ` Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 19:55 ` [PATCH -mm 00/15] VM pageout scalability improvements (V6) Rik van Riel
2008-05-08 4:54 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4828283C.4000803@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--to=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.