All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@amazon.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI: processor: perflib: Use the "no limit" frequency QoS
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 20:51:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <12138067.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher> (raw)

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

When _PPC returns 0, it means that the CPU frequency is not limited by
the platform firmware, so make acpi_processor_get_platform_limit()
update the frequency QoS request used by it to "no limit" in that case
and avoid updating the QoS request when the _PPC return value has not
changed.

This addresses a problem with limiting CPU frequency artificially on
some systems after CPU offline/online to the frequency that corresponds
to the first entry in the _PSS return package.

While at it, move the _PPC return value check against the state count
earlier to avoid setting performance_platform_limit to an invalid value.

Reported-by: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@amazon.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c |   27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_platform_l
 {
 	acpi_status status = 0;
 	unsigned long long ppc = 0;
+	s32 qos_value;
+	int index;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (!pr)
@@ -72,17 +74,30 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_platform_l
 		}
 	}
 
+	index = ppc;
+
+	if (pr->performance_platform_limit == index ||
+	    ppc >= pr->performance->state_count)
+		return 0;
+
 	pr_debug("CPU %d: _PPC is %d - frequency %s limited\n", pr->id,
-		       (int)ppc, ppc ? "" : "not");
+		 index, index ? "is" : "is not");
 
-	pr->performance_platform_limit = (int)ppc;
+	pr->performance_platform_limit = index;
 
-	if (ppc >= pr->performance->state_count ||
-	    unlikely(!freq_qos_request_active(&pr->perflib_req)))
+	if (unlikely(!freq_qos_request_active(&pr->perflib_req)))
 		return 0;
 
-	ret = freq_qos_update_request(&pr->perflib_req,
-			pr->performance->states[ppc].core_frequency * 1000);
+	/*
+	 * If _PPC returns 0, it means that all of the available states can be
+	 * used ("no limit").
+	 */
+	if (index == 0)
+		qos_value = FREQ_QOS_MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE;
+	else
+		qos_value = pr->performance->states[index].core_frequency * 1000;
+
+	ret = freq_qos_update_request(&pr->perflib_req, qos_value);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		pr_warn("Failed to update perflib freq constraint: CPU%d (%d)\n",
 			pr->id, ret);




             reply	other threads:[~2022-12-27 19:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-27 19:51 Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2022-12-27 19:52 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Drop ACPI _PSS states table patching Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-12-27 20:40 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI: processor: perflib: Use the "no limit" frequency QoS srinivas pandruvada
2022-12-28 20:41   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-12-28 14:22 ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-12-28 21:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-12-29 12:58   ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-12-29 19:26     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-01-30 14:17       ` Pratyush Yadav
2023-01-30 14:58         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-01-30 15:23           ` Pratyush Yadav
2023-02-14 13:40           ` srinivas pandruvada
2023-02-14 13:57             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-02-14 14:25               ` srinivas pandruvada
2023-02-14 14:41                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-12-28 21:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ACPI: processor: perflib: Avoid updating frequency QoS unnecessarily Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-12-28 21:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Drop ACPI _PSS states table patching Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=12138067.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ptyadav@amazon.de \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.