Re: [PATCH] fix to putback_lru_page()/unevictable page handling rework v3

[Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>]

On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 02:35 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > 'lru' was not being set to 'UNEVICTABLE when page was, in fact,
> > unevictable [really "nonreclaimable" :-)], so retry would never
> > happen, and culled pages never counted.
> >
> > Also, redundant mem_cgroup_move_lists()--one with incorrect 'lru',
> > in the case of unevictable pages--messes up memcontroller tracking [I think].
> 
> indeed.
> sorry, I forgot to send this fix.
> 
> Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> 
> but I still happend panic on usex and nishimura-san's cpuset migration test.
>   -> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=121375647720110&w=2
> 

I saw the description of the cpuset migration test.  Have you wrapped
this in a script suitable for running under usex?  If so, I would like
to get a copy.  Actually, please send me any automation you have for
this test and I'll incorporate it into the usex load.  Meanwhile, I'll
take a cut at adding such a test to the load.  However, we know that
your version can provoke the panic, so I'd like to get that.

> 
> I'll  investigate it tommorow.

Later, then,
Lee