All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>,
	Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Make CONFIG_MIGRATION available for s390
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:41:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1215448906.8431.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080707185433.5A5D.E1E9C6FF@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 19:24 +0900, Yasunori Goto wrote:
> > include/linux/mempolicy.h already has a !NUMA section could we not just
> > define policy_zone as 0 in that and leave this code unconditionally
> > compiled?  Perhaps also adding a NUMA_BUILD && to this 'if' should that
> > be clearer.
> > 
> Ah, yes. It's better. :-)

ok, the new patch below defines policy_zone as 0 in the !NUMA section. The
compiler will automatically omit the if statement w/o NUMA in this case.

> > But this does make me feel uneasy.  Are we really saying all memory on
> > an s390 is migratable.  That seems unlikely. As I understand the NUMA
> > case, we only allow migration of memory in the last zone (last two if we
> > have a MOVABLE zone) why are things different just because we have a
> > single 'node'.  Hmmm.  I suspect strongly that something is missnamed
> > more than there is a problem.
> 
> If my understanding is correct, even if this policy_zone check is removed,
> page isolation will just fail due to some busy pages.
> In hotplug case, it means giving up of hotremoving,
> and kernel must be rollback to make same condition of previous
> starting offline_pages().
> This check means just "early" check, but not so effective for hotremoving,
> I think....

It seems to me that this policy_zone check in vma_migratable() is not
called at all for the offline_pages() case, only for some NUMA system calls
that we don't support on s390. As Yasunori Goto said, page isolation checks
should do the job for memory hotremove via offline_pages(), independent from
any policy_zone setting. Any more thoughts on this?

Thanks,
Gerald
---

Subject: [PATCH] Make CONFIG_MIGRATION available for s390

From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>

We'd like to support CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE on s390, which depends on
CONFIG_MIGRATION. So far, CONFIG_MIGRATION is only available with NUMA
support.

This patch makes CONFIG_MIGRATION selectable for architectures that define
ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE. When MIGRATION is enabled w/o NUMA, the kernel
won't compile because of a missing migrate() function in vm_operations_struct
and a missing policy_zone reference in vma_migratable(). To avoid this,
policy_zone is defined as 0 for !NUMA, and the vm_ops migrate() definition
is moved from '#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA' to '#ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION'.

Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
---

 include/linux/mempolicy.h |    1 +
 include/linux/mm.h        |    2 ++
 mm/Kconfig                |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/mm.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/mm.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -193,6 +193,8 @@ struct vm_operations_struct {
 	 */
 	struct mempolicy *(*get_policy)(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 					unsigned long addr);
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
 	int (*migrate)(struct vm_area_struct *vma, const nodemask_t *from,
 		const nodemask_t *to, unsigned long flags);
 #endif
Index: linux-2.6/mm/Kconfig
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/Kconfig
+++ linux-2.6/mm/Kconfig
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ config SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS
 config MIGRATION
 	bool "Page migration"
 	def_bool y
-	depends on NUMA
+	depends on NUMA || ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
 	help
 	  Allows the migration of the physical location of pages of processes
 	  while the virtual addresses are not changed. This is useful for
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/mempolicy.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/mempolicy.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/mempolicy.h
@@ -222,6 +222,7 @@ extern int mpol_to_str(char *buffer, int
 #endif
 #else
 
+#define policy_zone	0
 struct mempolicy {};
 
 static inline int mpol_equal(struct mempolicy *a, struct mempolicy *b)



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>,
	Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Make CONFIG_MIGRATION available for s390
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:41:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1215448906.8431.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080707185433.5A5D.E1E9C6FF@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 19:24 +0900, Yasunori Goto wrote:
> > include/linux/mempolicy.h already has a !NUMA section could we not just
> > define policy_zone as 0 in that and leave this code unconditionally
> > compiled?  Perhaps also adding a NUMA_BUILD && to this 'if' should that
> > be clearer.
> > 
> Ah, yes. It's better. :-)

ok, the new patch below defines policy_zone as 0 in the !NUMA section. The
compiler will automatically omit the if statement w/o NUMA in this case.

> > But this does make me feel uneasy.  Are we really saying all memory on
> > an s390 is migratable.  That seems unlikely. As I understand the NUMA
> > case, we only allow migration of memory in the last zone (last two if we
> > have a MOVABLE zone) why are things different just because we have a
> > single 'node'.  Hmmm.  I suspect strongly that something is missnamed
> > more than there is a problem.
> 
> If my understanding is correct, even if this policy_zone check is removed,
> page isolation will just fail due to some busy pages.
> In hotplug case, it means giving up of hotremoving,
> and kernel must be rollback to make same condition of previous
> starting offline_pages().
> This check means just "early" check, but not so effective for hotremoving,
> I think....

It seems to me that this policy_zone check in vma_migratable() is not
called at all for the offline_pages() case, only for some NUMA system calls
that we don't support on s390. As Yasunori Goto said, page isolation checks
should do the job for memory hotremove via offline_pages(), independent from
any policy_zone setting. Any more thoughts on this?

Thanks,
Gerald
---

Subject: [PATCH] Make CONFIG_MIGRATION available for s390

From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>

We'd like to support CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE on s390, which depends on
CONFIG_MIGRATION. So far, CONFIG_MIGRATION is only available with NUMA
support.

This patch makes CONFIG_MIGRATION selectable for architectures that define
ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE. When MIGRATION is enabled w/o NUMA, the kernel
won't compile because of a missing migrate() function in vm_operations_struct
and a missing policy_zone reference in vma_migratable(). To avoid this,
policy_zone is defined as 0 for !NUMA, and the vm_ops migrate() definition
is moved from '#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA' to '#ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION'.

Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
---

 include/linux/mempolicy.h |    1 +
 include/linux/mm.h        |    2 ++
 mm/Kconfig                |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/mm.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/mm.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -193,6 +193,8 @@ struct vm_operations_struct {
 	 */
 	struct mempolicy *(*get_policy)(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 					unsigned long addr);
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
 	int (*migrate)(struct vm_area_struct *vma, const nodemask_t *from,
 		const nodemask_t *to, unsigned long flags);
 #endif
Index: linux-2.6/mm/Kconfig
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/Kconfig
+++ linux-2.6/mm/Kconfig
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ config SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS
 config MIGRATION
 	bool "Page migration"
 	def_bool y
-	depends on NUMA
+	depends on NUMA || ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
 	help
 	  Allows the migration of the physical location of pages of processes
 	  while the virtual addresses are not changed. This is useful for
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/mempolicy.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/mempolicy.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/mempolicy.h
@@ -222,6 +222,7 @@ extern int mpol_to_str(char *buffer, int
 #endif
 #else
 
+#define policy_zone	0
 struct mempolicy {};
 
 static inline int mpol_equal(struct mempolicy *a, struct mempolicy *b)


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-07 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-06 14:35 [PATCH] Make CONFIG_MIGRATION available for s390 Gerald Schaefer
2008-07-06 14:35 ` [PATCH] Make CONFIG_MIGRATION available for s390, " Gerald Schaefer
2008-07-07  6:22 ` Yasunori Goto
2008-07-07  6:22   ` Yasunori Goto
2008-07-07  9:16 ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-07-07  9:16   ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-07-07 10:24   ` Yasunori Goto
2008-07-07 10:24     ` Yasunori Goto
2008-07-07 16:41     ` Gerald Schaefer [this message]
2008-07-07 16:41       ` Gerald Schaefer
2008-07-07 16:53       ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-07 16:53         ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-07 15:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-07 15:09   ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-07 17:28   ` Gerald Schaefer
2008-07-07 17:28     ` Gerald Schaefer
2008-07-07 17:38     ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-07 17:38       ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-07 18:25       ` Gerald Schaefer
2008-07-07 18:25         ` Gerald Schaefer
2008-07-07 18:32         ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-07 18:32           ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-08 10:50           ` [PATCH] Make CONFIG_MIGRATION available w/o NUMA Gerald Schaefer
2008-07-08 10:50             ` Gerald Schaefer
2008-07-08 13:35             ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-08 13:35               ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-08 13:47               ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-08 13:47                 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-11 13:05               ` Gerald Schaefer
2008-07-11 13:05                 ` Gerald Schaefer
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-04 14:58 [PATCH] Make CONFIG_MIGRATION available for s390 Gerald Schaefer
2008-07-05  4:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-07-05  4:02   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-07-05  6:14   ` Yasunori Goto
2008-07-05  6:14     ` Yasunori Goto
2008-07-06 14:30     ` Gerald Schaefer
2008-07-06 14:30       ` Gerald Schaefer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1215448906.8431.52.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apw@shadowen.org \
    --cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.