From: Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@free.fr>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: persistent reservation behaviour with dm-multipath
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:01:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1216245671.28212.29.camel@plop> (raw)
The current dm-multipath behaviour is currently a potent data corrupter
on PR-based clusters sharing multipaths with the queue_if_no_path
feature on. Consider the following scenario :
- Node A take a write-exclusive persistent reservation on LU
- Node B submits a write io to LU, which is a sda-sdb multipath
- B dm_multipath routes the wio to sda, the wio is failed, the path is
marked failed
- B dm_multipath routes the wio to sdb, the wio is failed, the last
path is marked failed
- B queues the wio because of the queue_if_no_path feature. Process
submitting the wio is stuck in D-state.
- A releases the reservation. Queued wios are unqueued, corrupting the
data on LU.
I suspect wio returning a "reservation conflict" status should never be
queued.
DM suspend/resume on the multipath effectively flushes the queue, but
this solution leaves a window open for data corruption, between io
enqueue and user-space driven queue flush.
I saw Mike's Aug 2005 patches for scsi errors translation in block-layer
errors, which were a usable infrastructure to implement the desired
behaviour. Is some variant of this work headed for the upstream kernel ?
Regards,
cvaroqui
next reply other threads:[~2008-07-16 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-16 22:01 Christophe Varoqui [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-19 8:59 persistent reservation behaviour with dm-multipath Christophe Varoqui
2008-07-23 20:28 ` Douglas Gilbert
2008-07-23 21:09 ` Christophe Varoqui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1216245671.28212.29.camel@plop \
--to=christophe.varoqui@free.fr \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.