All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@free.fr>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: persistent reservation behaviour with dm-multipath
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:59:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1216457992.7364.15.camel@plop> (raw)

The current dm-multipath behaviour is currently a potent data corrupter
on Persistant Reservation-based clusters sharing multipaths with the
queue_if_no_path feature on (Clariion, Storageworks, ...).

Consider the following scenario :

- Node A take a write-exclusive persistent reservation on LU
- Node B submits a write io to LU, which is a sda-sdb multipath
- B dm_multipath routes the wio to sda, the wio is failed, the path is
marked failed
- B dm_multipath routes the wio to sdb, the wio is failed, the last
path is marked failed
- B queues the wio because of the queue_if_no_path feature. Process
submitting the wio is stuck in D-state.
- A releases the reservation. Queued wios are unqueued, corrupting the
data on LU.

I suspect wio returning a "reservation conflict" status should never be
queued.

DM suspend/resume on the multipath devmap effectively flushes the queue,
but this solution leaves a window open for data corruption, between io
enqueue and user-space driven queue flush.

Is there work in progress to address this issue yet ? What's would be an
acceptable solution design (for example Mike Christie suggested in Aug
2005 a scsi-to-blk error translation patch, which got nowhere) ?

Regards,
cvaroqui

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

             reply	other threads:[~2008-07-19  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-19  8:59 Christophe Varoqui [this message]
2008-07-23 20:28 ` persistent reservation behaviour with dm-multipath Douglas Gilbert
2008-07-23 21:09   ` Christophe Varoqui
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-16 22:01 Christophe Varoqui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1216457992.7364.15.camel@plop \
    --to=christophe.varoqui@free.fr \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.