From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net,
cel <cel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] powerpc/cell/oprofile: fix mutex locking for spu-oprofile
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:20:10 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1219314010.7827.4.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200808211014.42683.arnd@arndb.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1296 bytes --]
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 10:14 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 21 August 2008, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > Arnd Bergmann writes:
> >
> > > Paul, any chance we can still get this into 2.6.27?
> >
> > Possibly. We'll need a really good explanation for Linus as to why
> > this is needed (what regression or serious bug this fixes) and why it
> > is late. Can you send me something explaining that?
>
> The patch does not fix a regression, the spu-oprofile code basically never
> worked. With the current code in Linux, samples in the profile buffer
> can get corrupted because reader and writer to that buffer use different
> locks for accessing it.
Actually for me it worked[1] a reasonable amount of the time, enough to
be useful. So the spu-oprofile code has always been broken in this way,
but it's not always fatal. So the patch doesn't fix a regression, but it
fixes a serious user-visible bug, which makes it legit rc4 material
IMHO.
[1] that was late last year, so possibly a kernel or two ago.
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org, Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net,
cel <cel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] powerpc/cell/oprofile: fix mutex locking for spu-oprofile
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:20:10 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1219314010.7827.4.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200808211014.42683.arnd@arndb.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1296 bytes --]
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 10:14 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 21 August 2008, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > Arnd Bergmann writes:
> >
> > > Paul, any chance we can still get this into 2.6.27?
> >
> > Possibly. We'll need a really good explanation for Linus as to why
> > this is needed (what regression or serious bug this fixes) and why it
> > is late. Can you send me something explaining that?
>
> The patch does not fix a regression, the spu-oprofile code basically never
> worked. With the current code in Linux, samples in the profile buffer
> can get corrupted because reader and writer to that buffer use different
> locks for accessing it.
Actually for me it worked[1] a reasonable amount of the time, enough to
be useful. So the spu-oprofile code has always been broken in this way,
but it's not always fatal. So the patch doesn't fix a regression, but it
fixes a serious user-visible bug, which makes it legit rc4 material
IMHO.
[1] that was late last year, so possibly a kernel or two ago.
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-21 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-01 20:01 [PATCH 2/2] Cell OProfile: SPU mutex lock fix, version 4 Carl Love
2008-08-08 13:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-08 13:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-08 22:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] Repost " Carl Love
2008-08-09 13:13 ` please pull cell merge branch Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-09 13:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-10 23:17 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-08-10 23:17 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-08-11 7:18 ` [Cbe-oss-dev] " Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-11 7:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-11 7:25 ` powerpc/cell/oprofile: fix mutex locking for spu-oprofile Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-11 7:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-20 11:57 ` Robert Richter
2008-08-20 11:57 ` Robert Richter
2008-08-20 12:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-20 12:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-20 12:39 ` Robert Richter
2008-08-20 12:39 ` Robert Richter
2008-08-20 14:58 ` Carl Love
2008-08-20 12:39 ` Robert Richter
2008-08-20 12:39 ` Robert Richter
2008-08-20 13:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-20 13:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-21 4:21 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-08-21 4:21 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-08-21 8:14 ` [Cbe-oss-dev] " Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-21 8:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-21 10:20 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2008-08-21 10:20 ` Michael Ellerman
2008-08-21 14:58 ` Carl Love
2008-08-25 6:31 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-08-25 6:31 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-08-25 7:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-25 7:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-10-13 14:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-10-13 14:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-10-13 15:13 ` Robert Richter
2008-10-13 15:13 ` Robert Richter
2008-08-11 7:25 ` powerpc/cell/oprofile: avoid double free of profile buffer Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-11 7:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-19 11:53 ` Robert Richter
2008-08-19 11:53 ` Robert Richter
2008-08-11 15:34 ` [Cbe-oss-dev] please pull cell merge branch Carl Love
2008-08-11 15:34 ` Carl Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1219314010.7827.4.camel@localhost \
--to=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=cel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.