Re: Sendkey patch

["Javier Martín" <lordhabbit@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1152 bytes --]

Hi again,

El mié, 03-09-2008 a las 11:10 +0200, phcoder escribió:
> >> I'll have a look at it but not sure to find anything since I'm not
> >> familiar with either ata or reiserfs internal structure.
> > I was not suggesting that it was you or me who did it; it was a general
> > "call" for GRUB devs... (ahem xD)
> > 
> I understand. I was saying that I'll just have a look at least to know
> what I'm talking about. But even if we manage to decrease the size of
> reiserfs module there are still other FS which could result in big
> modules e.g. ZFS.
Of course, but even though we should strive to support te widest module
configurations possible, GRUB is no panacea. Even when an initialized
GRUB could cope with a ZFS partition in a LVM+RAID on SATA drives not
supported by the BIOS, one should not really expect to be able to boot
directly off it - get a simpler boot scheme, man! extN, FAT or even SFS
are way simpler filesystems which should be used for boot partitions.
More complex filesystems such as ReiserFS or NTFS require _less_ complex
schemes such as no LVM+RAID in order to keep the total core size
manageable.

[-- Attachment #2: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]