All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@bull.net>,
	Christoph Raisch <RAISCH@de.ibm.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Jan-Bernd Themann <ossthema@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH HACK] powerpc: quick hack to get a functional eHEA with hardirq preemption
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:17:47 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1222251467.8277.73.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200809240958.m8O9wM7k010996@sullivan.realtime.net>

On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 04:58 -0500, Milton Miller wrote:
> The per-interrupt mask and unmask calls have to go through RTAS, a
> single-threaded global context, which in addition to increasing
> path length will really limit scalability.  The interrupt controller
> poll and reject facilities are accessed through hypervisor calls
> which are comparable to a fast syscall, and parallel to all cpus.

Note also that the XICS code thus assumes, iirc, as does the cell IIC
code, that eoi is called on the -same- cpu that fetched the interrupt
initially. That assumption can be broken with IRQ threads no ?

Ben.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>
Cc: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@bull.net>,
	Jan-Bernd Themann <ossthema@de.ibm.com>,
	Christoph Raisch <RAISCH@de.ibm.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH HACK] powerpc: quick hack to get a functional eHEA with hardirq preemption
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:17:47 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1222251467.8277.73.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200809240958.m8O9wM7k010996@sullivan.realtime.net>

On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 04:58 -0500, Milton Miller wrote:
> The per-interrupt mask and unmask calls have to go through RTAS, a
> single-threaded global context, which in addition to increasing
> path length will really limit scalability.  The interrupt controller
> poll and reject facilities are accessed through hypervisor calls
> which are comparable to a fast syscall, and parallel to all cpus.

Note also that the XICS code thus assumes, iirc, as does the cell IIC
code, that eoi is called on the -same- cpu that fetched the interrupt
initially. That assumption can be broken with IRQ threads no ?

Ben.



  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-24 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-15  8:04 [PATCH HACK] powerpc: quick hack to get a functional eHEA with hardirq preemption Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-15  8:04 ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-15 12:17 ` Jan-Bernd Themann
2008-09-15 12:17   ` Jan-Bernd Themann
2008-09-15 12:35 ` Thomas Klein
2008-09-15 12:35   ` Thomas Klein
2008-09-15 13:13   ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-15 13:13     ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-16 11:59     ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-09-16 11:59       ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-09-16 12:22       ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-16 12:22         ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-18  7:53 ` Christoph Raisch
2008-09-18  7:53   ` Christoph Raisch
2008-09-18  9:27   ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-18  9:27     ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-18 10:42     ` [PATCH HACK] powerpc: quick hack to get a functional eHEA with hardirq preemption, eHCA is close Christoph Raisch
2008-09-18 10:42       ` Christoph Raisch
2008-09-18 12:31       ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-18 12:31         ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-23 15:43         ` Jan-Bernd Themann
2008-09-23 15:43           ` Jan-Bernd Themann
2008-09-24  9:58           ` [PATCH HACK] powerpc: quick hack to get a functional eHEA with hardirq preemption Milton Miller
2008-09-24  9:58             ` Milton Miller
2008-09-24 10:17             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2008-09-24 10:17               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-24 11:02               ` Milton Miller
2008-09-24 11:02                 ` Milton Miller
2008-09-24 21:14                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-24 21:14                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-25  7:31                   ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-25  7:31                     ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-24 12:35               ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-24 12:35                 ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-24 21:15                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-24 21:15                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-25  7:18                   ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-25  7:18                     ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-25  7:22                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-25  7:22                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-25  7:42                       ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-25  7:42                         ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-25  8:36                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-25  8:36                           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-25  8:39                           ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-25  8:39                             ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-24 12:30             ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-24 12:30               ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-24 16:42               ` Milton Miller
2008-09-24 16:42                 ` Milton Miller
2008-09-24 21:16                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-24 21:16                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-25  3:56                   ` Milton Miller
2008-09-25  3:56                     ` Milton Miller
2008-09-25  8:45                 ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-25  8:45                   ` Sebastien Dugue
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-25 23:40 Milton Miller
2008-09-25 23:40 ` Milton Miller
2008-09-26  9:16 ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-26  9:16   ` Sebastien Dugue

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1222251467.8277.73.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=RAISCH@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=miltonm@bga.com \
    --cc=ossthema@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=sebastien.dugue@bull.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.