All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@bull.net>
To: Christoph Raisch <RAISCH@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Q Klein <TKLEIN@de.ibm.com>,
	tinytim@us.ibm.com, Linux-rt <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jan-Bernd Themann <THEMANN@de.ibm.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, jean-pierre.dion@bull.net,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-ppc <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <bherren@au1.ibm.com>,
	Hoang-Nam Nguyen <HNGUYEN@de.ibm.com>,
	gilles.carry@ext.bull.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH HACK] powerpc: quick hack to get a functional eHEA with hardirq preemption, eHCA is close
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:31:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080918143146.77db81d5@bull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFD7842B7A.ADC47EED-ONC12574C8.003A2CB3-C12574C8.003AC948@de.ibm.com>

On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:42:05 +0200 Christoph Raisch <RAISCH@de.ibm.com> wrote:

> 
> Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@bull.net> wrote on 18.09.2008 11:27:13:
> 
> >
> >   It would be really interresting to know if the eHCA exhibits the same
> > problem under -rt as it's the only other user of the ibmebus.
> > Unfortunately I don't have the hardware to test.
> >
> 
> eHCA is very close from the interrupt generation and handling perspective,
> so yes, could be an issue there as well.

  That's what I was speculating.

  Thanks,

  Sebastien.

> 
> 
> Gruss / Regards
> Christoph Raisch
> 
> 
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@bull.net>
To: Christoph Raisch <RAISCH@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <bherren@au1.ibm.com>,
	gilles.carry@ext.bull.net, Jan-Bernd Themann <THEMANN@de.ibm.com>,
	jean-pierre.dion@bull.net,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-rt <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-ppc <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Q Klein <TKLEIN@de.ibm.com>,
	tinytim@us.ibm.com, Hoang-Nam Nguyen <HNGUYEN@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH HACK] powerpc: quick hack to get a functional eHEA with hardirq preemption, eHCA is close
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:31:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080918143146.77db81d5@bull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFD7842B7A.ADC47EED-ONC12574C8.003A2CB3-C12574C8.003AC948@de.ibm.com>

On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:42:05 +0200 Christoph Raisch <RAISCH@de.ibm.com> wrote:

> 
> Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@bull.net> wrote on 18.09.2008 11:27:13:
> 
> >
> >   It would be really interresting to know if the eHCA exhibits the same
> > problem under -rt as it's the only other user of the ibmebus.
> > Unfortunately I don't have the hardware to test.
> >
> 
> eHCA is very close from the interrupt generation and handling perspective,
> so yes, could be an issue there as well.

  That's what I was speculating.

  Thanks,

  Sebastien.

> 
> 
> Gruss / Regards
> Christoph Raisch
> 
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-18 12:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-15  8:04 [PATCH HACK] powerpc: quick hack to get a functional eHEA with hardirq preemption Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-15  8:04 ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-15 12:17 ` Jan-Bernd Themann
2008-09-15 12:17   ` Jan-Bernd Themann
2008-09-15 12:35 ` Thomas Klein
2008-09-15 12:35   ` Thomas Klein
2008-09-15 13:13   ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-15 13:13     ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-16 11:59     ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-09-16 11:59       ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-09-16 12:22       ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-16 12:22         ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-18  7:53 ` Christoph Raisch
2008-09-18  7:53   ` Christoph Raisch
2008-09-18  9:27   ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-18  9:27     ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-18 10:42     ` [PATCH HACK] powerpc: quick hack to get a functional eHEA with hardirq preemption, eHCA is close Christoph Raisch
2008-09-18 10:42       ` Christoph Raisch
2008-09-18 12:31       ` Sebastien Dugue [this message]
2008-09-18 12:31         ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-23 15:43         ` Jan-Bernd Themann
2008-09-23 15:43           ` Jan-Bernd Themann
2008-09-24  9:58           ` [PATCH HACK] powerpc: quick hack to get a functional eHEA with hardirq preemption Milton Miller
2008-09-24  9:58             ` Milton Miller
2008-09-24 10:17             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-24 10:17               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-24 11:02               ` Milton Miller
2008-09-24 11:02                 ` Milton Miller
2008-09-24 21:14                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-24 21:14                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-25  7:31                   ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-25  7:31                     ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-24 12:35               ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-24 12:35                 ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-24 21:15                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-24 21:15                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-25  7:18                   ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-25  7:18                     ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-25  7:22                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-25  7:22                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-25  7:42                       ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-25  7:42                         ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-25  8:36                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-25  8:36                           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-25  8:39                           ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-25  8:39                             ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-24 12:30             ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-24 12:30               ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-24 16:42               ` Milton Miller
2008-09-24 16:42                 ` Milton Miller
2008-09-24 21:16                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-24 21:16                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-25  3:56                   ` Milton Miller
2008-09-25  3:56                     ` Milton Miller
2008-09-25  8:45                 ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-25  8:45                   ` Sebastien Dugue

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080918143146.77db81d5@bull.net \
    --to=sebastien.dugue@bull.net \
    --cc=HNGUYEN@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=RAISCH@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=THEMANN@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=TKLEIN@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=bherren@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=gilles.carry@ext.bull.net \
    --cc=jean-pierre.dion@bull.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tinytim@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.