All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	akpm <akpm@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] SLOB's krealloc() seems bust
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:15:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1223442947.13453.462.camel@calx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200810081611.30897.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>


On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 16:11 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 October 2008 15:54, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > On Wednesday 08 October 2008 15:46, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 15:22 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 08 October 2008 10:08, Matt Mackall wrote:
> 
> > > > > diff -r 5e32b09a1b2b mm/slob.c
> > > > > --- a/mm/slob.c	Fri Oct 03 14:04:43 2008 -0500
> > > > > +++ b/mm/slob.c	Tue Oct 07 18:05:15 2008 -0500
> > > > > @@ -514,9 +514,11 @@
> > > > >  		return 0;
> > > > >
> > > > >  	sp = (struct slob_page *)virt_to_page(block);
> > > > > -	if (slob_page(sp))
> > > > > -		return ((slob_t *)block - 1)->units + SLOB_UNIT;
> > > > > -	else
> > > > > +	if (slob_page(sp)) {
> > > > > +		int align = max(ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN, ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN);
> > > > > +		unsigned int *m = (unsigned int *)(block - align);
> > > > > +		return SLOB_UNITS(*m); /* round up */
> > > > > +	} else
> > > > >  		return sp->page.private;
> > > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I came up with nearly the same patch before reading this
> > > >
> > > > --- linux-2.6/mm/slob.c 2008-10-08 14:43:17.000000000 +1100
> > > > +++ suth/mm/slob.c      2008-10-08 15:11:06.000000000 +1100
> > > > @@ -514,9 +514,11 @@ size_t ksize(const void *block)
> > > >                 return 0;
> > > >
> > > >         sp = (struct slob_page *)virt_to_page(block);
> > > > -       if (slob_page(sp))
> > > > -               return (((slob_t *)block - 1)->units - 1) * SLOB_UNIT;
> > > > -       else
> > > > +       if (slob_page(sp)) {
> > > > +               int align = max(ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN,
> > > > ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN); +               unsigned int *m = (unsigned int
> > > > *)(block - align); +               return *m + align;
> > > > +       } else
> > > >                 return sp->page.private;
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > However, mine is lifted directly from kfree, wheras you do something a
> > > > bit different. Hmm, ksize arguably could be used to find the underlying
> > > > allocated slab size in order to use a little bit more than we'd asked
> > > > for. So probably we should really just `return *m` (don't round up or
> > > > add any padding).
> > >
> > > Huh? ksize should report how much space is available in the buffer. If
> > > we request 33 bytes from SLUB and it gives us 64, ksize reports 64. If
> > > we request 33 bytes from SLOB and it gives us 34, we should report 34.
> >
> > Oh.. hmm yeah right, I didn't realise what you were doing there.
> > OK, so your patch looks good to me then (provided it is diffed against
> > the previous one, for Linus).
> 
> OK, no, that's why I got confused. SLOB_UNITS will round you up to the
> next SLOB_UNIT. You'd then have to multiply by SLOB_UNIT to get back to
> bytes.

Damnit, how many ways can we get confused by these little details? I'll
spin a final version and run it against the test harness shortly.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	akpm <akpm@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] SLOB's krealloc() seems bust
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:15:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1223442947.13453.462.camel@calx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200810081611.30897.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>

On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 16:11 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 October 2008 15:54, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > On Wednesday 08 October 2008 15:46, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 15:22 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 08 October 2008 10:08, Matt Mackall wrote:
> 
> > > > > diff -r 5e32b09a1b2b mm/slob.c
> > > > > --- a/mm/slob.c	Fri Oct 03 14:04:43 2008 -0500
> > > > > +++ b/mm/slob.c	Tue Oct 07 18:05:15 2008 -0500
> > > > > @@ -514,9 +514,11 @@
> > > > >  		return 0;
> > > > >
> > > > >  	sp = (struct slob_page *)virt_to_page(block);
> > > > > -	if (slob_page(sp))
> > > > > -		return ((slob_t *)block - 1)->units + SLOB_UNIT;
> > > > > -	else
> > > > > +	if (slob_page(sp)) {
> > > > > +		int align = max(ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN, ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN);
> > > > > +		unsigned int *m = (unsigned int *)(block - align);
> > > > > +		return SLOB_UNITS(*m); /* round up */
> > > > > +	} else
> > > > >  		return sp->page.private;
> > > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I came up with nearly the same patch before reading this
> > > >
> > > > --- linux-2.6/mm/slob.c 2008-10-08 14:43:17.000000000 +1100
> > > > +++ suth/mm/slob.c      2008-10-08 15:11:06.000000000 +1100
> > > > @@ -514,9 +514,11 @@ size_t ksize(const void *block)
> > > >                 return 0;
> > > >
> > > >         sp = (struct slob_page *)virt_to_page(block);
> > > > -       if (slob_page(sp))
> > > > -               return (((slob_t *)block - 1)->units - 1) * SLOB_UNIT;
> > > > -       else
> > > > +       if (slob_page(sp)) {
> > > > +               int align = max(ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN,
> > > > ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN); +               unsigned int *m = (unsigned int
> > > > *)(block - align); +               return *m + align;
> > > > +       } else
> > > >                 return sp->page.private;
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > However, mine is lifted directly from kfree, wheras you do something a
> > > > bit different. Hmm, ksize arguably could be used to find the underlying
> > > > allocated slab size in order to use a little bit more than we'd asked
> > > > for. So probably we should really just `return *m` (don't round up or
> > > > add any padding).
> > >
> > > Huh? ksize should report how much space is available in the buffer. If
> > > we request 33 bytes from SLUB and it gives us 64, ksize reports 64. If
> > > we request 33 bytes from SLOB and it gives us 34, we should report 34.
> >
> > Oh.. hmm yeah right, I didn't realise what you were doing there.
> > OK, so your patch looks good to me then (provided it is diffed against
> > the previous one, for Linus).
> 
> OK, no, that's why I got confused. SLOB_UNITS will round you up to the
> next SLOB_UNIT. You'd then have to multiply by SLOB_UNIT to get back to
> bytes.

Damnit, how many ways can we get confused by these little details? I'll
spin a final version and run it against the test harness shortly.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-08  5:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-07 13:57 [BUG] SLOB's krealloc() seems bust Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-07 13:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-07 14:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-07 14:07   ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-07 14:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-07 14:13     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-07 14:26     ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-07 14:26       ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-07 15:00   ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-07 15:00     ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-07 15:20     ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-07 15:20       ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-07 15:58       ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-07 15:58         ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-07 16:10     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-07 16:10       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-07 16:37       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-07 16:37         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-07 16:37       ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-07 16:37         ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-07 16:57         ` Pekka Enberg
2008-10-07 16:57           ` Pekka Enberg
2008-10-07 17:13           ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-07 17:13             ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-07 17:31             ` Pekka Enberg
2008-10-07 17:31               ` Pekka Enberg
2008-10-07 23:08               ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-07 23:08                 ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-08  4:22                 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-08  4:22                   ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-08  4:46                   ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-08  4:46                     ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-08  4:54                     ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-08  4:54                       ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-08  5:11                       ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-08  5:11                         ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-08  5:15                         ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2008-10-08  5:15                           ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-08  6:43                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-08  6:43                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-08  7:25                             ` Pekka Enberg
2008-10-08  7:25                               ` Pekka Enberg
2008-10-08  7:37                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-08  7:37                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-08  7:39                                 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-10-08  7:39                                   ` Pekka Enberg
2008-10-07 17:57         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-07 17:57           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-07 18:11           ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-07 18:11             ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-07 18:18             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-07 18:18               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-08 19:51               ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-08 19:51                 ` Matt Mackall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1223442947.13453.462.camel@calx \
    --to=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.