From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
akpm <akpm@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] SLOB's krealloc() seems bust
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:37:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1223451433.1378.29.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84144f020810080025o348ae189vab83f1620b2e9560@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 10:25 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 00:15 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> >> Damnit, how many ways can we get confused by these little details? I'll
> >> spin a final version and run it against the test harness shortly.
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> > So I'll wait with testing for the next version?
>
> AFAICT, this should be fine:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/7/436
>
> You need to revert the patch Linus already committed before applying
> that though.
Or not have pulled it yet ;-)
Anyway, that patch seems to be good on 4 boots.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
akpm <akpm@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] SLOB's krealloc() seems bust
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:37:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1223451433.1378.29.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84144f020810080025o348ae189vab83f1620b2e9560@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 10:25 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 00:15 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> >> Damnit, how many ways can we get confused by these little details? I'll
> >> spin a final version and run it against the test harness shortly.
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> > So I'll wait with testing for the next version?
>
> AFAICT, this should be fine:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/7/436
>
> You need to revert the patch Linus already committed before applying
> that though.
Or not have pulled it yet ;-)
Anyway, that patch seems to be good on 4 boots.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-08 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-07 13:57 [BUG] SLOB's krealloc() seems bust Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-07 13:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-07 14:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-07 14:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-07 14:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-07 14:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-07 14:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-07 14:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-07 15:00 ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-07 15:00 ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-07 15:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-07 15:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-07 15:58 ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-07 15:58 ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-07 16:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-07 16:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-07 16:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-07 16:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-07 16:37 ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-07 16:37 ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-07 16:57 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-10-07 16:57 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-10-07 17:13 ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-07 17:13 ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-07 17:31 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-10-07 17:31 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-10-07 23:08 ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-07 23:08 ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-08 4:22 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-08 4:22 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-08 4:46 ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-08 4:46 ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-08 4:54 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-08 4:54 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-08 5:11 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-08 5:11 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-08 5:15 ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-08 5:15 ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-08 6:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-08 6:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-08 7:25 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-10-08 7:25 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-10-08 7:37 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-10-08 7:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-08 7:39 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-10-08 7:39 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-10-07 17:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-07 17:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-07 18:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-07 18:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-07 18:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-07 18:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-08 19:51 ` Matt Mackall
2008-10-08 19:51 ` Matt Mackall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1223451433.1378.29.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.