From: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.28-rc9 panics with crashkernel=256M while booting
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:36:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1230586567.19452.100.camel@nimitz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18772.11376.339295.42622@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
On Fri, 2008-12-26 at 11:59 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>
> > diff -puN arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c~2628-rc9-panics-with-crashkernel=256m-while-booting arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c~2628-rc9-panics-with-crashkernel=256m-while-booting
> > +++ a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> > @@ -995,10 +995,11 @@ void __init do_init_bootmem(void)
> > start_pfn, end_pfn);
> >
> > free_bootmem_with_active_regions(nid, end_pfn);
> > + }
> > +
> > + for_each_online_node(nid) {
> > /*
> > - * Be very careful about moving this around. Future
> > - * calls to careful_allocation() depend on this getting
> > - * done correctly.
> > + * Be very careful about moving this around.
> > */
> > mark_reserved_regions_for_nid(nid);
> > sparse_memory_present_with_active_regions(nid);
I think this reintroduces one of the bugs that I squashed. You *have*
to call mark_reserved_regions_for_nid() right after you do
free_bootmem_with_active_regions(). Otherwise, someone else can
bootmem_alloc() a reserved region from that node.
Perhaps I need to make that comment a bit more forceful. :)
/*
* Don't break this loop out. Period. Never. Ever.
* No, seriously. Don't do it. I mean it. Really!
*/
-- Dave
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Chandru <chandru@in.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.28-rc9 panics with crashkernel=256M while booting
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:36:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1230586567.19452.100.camel@nimitz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18772.11376.339295.42622@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
On Fri, 2008-12-26 at 11:59 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>
> > diff -puN arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c~2628-rc9-panics-with-crashkernel=256m-while-booting arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c~2628-rc9-panics-with-crashkernel=256m-while-booting
> > +++ a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> > @@ -995,10 +995,11 @@ void __init do_init_bootmem(void)
> > start_pfn, end_pfn);
> >
> > free_bootmem_with_active_regions(nid, end_pfn);
> > + }
> > +
> > + for_each_online_node(nid) {
> > /*
> > - * Be very careful about moving this around. Future
> > - * calls to careful_allocation() depend on this getting
> > - * done correctly.
> > + * Be very careful about moving this around.
> > */
> > mark_reserved_regions_for_nid(nid);
> > sparse_memory_present_with_active_regions(nid);
I think this reintroduces one of the bugs that I squashed. You *have*
to call mark_reserved_regions_for_nid() right after you do
free_bootmem_with_active_regions(). Otherwise, someone else can
bootmem_alloc() a reserved region from that node.
Perhaps I need to make that comment a bit more forceful. :)
/*
* Don't break this loop out. Period. Never. Ever.
* No, seriously. Don't do it. I mean it. Really!
*/
-- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-29 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-24 7:55 2.6.28-rc9 panics with crashkernel=256M while booting Chandru
2008-12-25 7:35 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-25 7:35 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-25 8:07 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-26 6:35 ` Chandru
2008-12-26 0:59 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-26 0:59 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-29 21:36 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2008-12-29 21:36 ` Dave Hansen
2009-01-05 13:49 ` Chandru
2009-01-05 13:49 ` Chandru
2009-01-05 16:30 ` Dave Hansen
2009-01-05 16:30 ` Dave Hansen
2009-01-07 12:58 ` Chandru
2009-01-07 12:58 ` Chandru
2009-01-07 17:25 ` Dave Hansen
2009-01-07 17:25 ` Dave Hansen
2009-01-08 10:29 ` Chandru
2009-01-08 10:29 ` Chandru
2009-01-08 20:03 ` Dave Hansen
2009-01-08 20:03 ` Dave Hansen
2009-01-09 11:07 ` Chandru
2009-01-09 11:07 ` Chandru
2009-01-15 8:05 ` Chandru
2009-01-15 8:05 ` Chandru
2009-01-16 12:16 ` Chandru
2009-01-16 12:16 ` Chandru
2009-01-16 17:52 ` Dave Hansen
2009-01-16 17:52 ` Dave Hansen
2009-01-19 8:11 ` Chandru
2009-01-19 8:11 ` Chandru
2009-01-19 11:30 ` Chandru
2009-01-19 11:30 ` Chandru
2009-01-20 8:13 ` Chandru
2009-01-22 0:29 ` Dave Hansen
2009-01-22 0:29 ` Dave Hansen
2009-01-22 8:20 ` Chandru
2009-01-22 8:20 ` Chandru
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1230586567.19452.100.camel@nimitz \
--to=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.