From: Ed Swierk <eswierk-BGArkANP9klv6pq1l3V1OdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: David Brownell <david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>,
Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Alessandro Zummo
<a.zummo-BfzFCNDTiLLj+vYz1yj4TQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Andrew
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc-ds1307: True SMBus compatibility
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:54:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1233006862.19874.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200901261306.21059.david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 13:06 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> I have two patch format issues:
>
> - Always put a line of whitespace after variable
> declarations.
>
> - Include text like the above as part of the patch,
> even if you're stuck with a mailer that mangles
> non-attached text.
>
> You're using Evolution, which is mentioned in the
> Documentation/email-clients.txt file as having a
> way (albeit awkward) to send normal patch email.
>
> Given those changes:
>
> Acked-by: David Brownell <dbrownell-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
>
> Thanks.
Thanks for the feedback. Here you go:
Allow the rtc-ds1307 driver to work with SMBus controllers like nforce2
that do not support i2c block transfers.
Signed-off-by: Ed Swierk <eswierk-BGArkANP9klv6pq1l3V1OdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Index: linux-2.6.27.4/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.27.4.orig/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
+++ linux-2.6.27.4/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
@@ -94,6 +94,10 @@ struct ds1307 {
struct i2c_client *client;
struct rtc_device *rtc;
struct work_struct work;
+ s32 (*read_block_data)(struct i2c_client *client, u8 command,
+ u8 length, u8 *values);
+ s32 (*write_block_data)(struct i2c_client *client, u8 command,
+ u8 length, const u8 *values);
};
struct chip_desc {
@@ -132,6 +136,79 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ds1307_id);
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
+#define BLOCK_DATA_MAX_TRIES 10
+
+static s32 ds1307_read_block_data_once(struct i2c_client *client, u8 command,
+ u8 length, u8 *values)
+{
+ s32 i, data;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < length; i++) {
+ data = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, command + i);
+ if (data < 0)
+ return data;
+ values[i] = data;
+ }
+ return i;
+}
+
+static s32 ds1307_read_block_data(struct i2c_client *client, u8 command,
+ u8 length, u8 *values)
+{
+ u8 oldvalues[I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX];
+ s32 ret;
+ int tries = 0;
+
+ dev_dbg(&client->dev, "ds1307_read_block_data (length=%d)\n", length);
+ ret = ds1307_read_block_data_once(client, command, length, values);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ do {
+ if (++tries > BLOCK_DATA_MAX_TRIES) {
+ dev_err(&client->dev,
+ "ds1307_read_block_data failed\n");
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+ memcpy(oldvalues, values, length);
+ ret = ds1307_read_block_data_once(client, command, length,
+ values);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ } while (memcmp(oldvalues, values, length));
+ return length;
+}
+
+static s32 ds1307_write_block_data(struct i2c_client *client, u8 command,
+ u8 length, const u8 *values)
+{
+ u8 currvalues[I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX];
+ int tries = 0;
+
+ dev_dbg(&client->dev, "ds1307_write_block_data (length=%d)\n", length);
+ do {
+ s32 i, ret;
+
+ if (++tries > BLOCK_DATA_MAX_TRIES) {
+ dev_err(&client->dev,
+ "ds1307_write_block_data failed\n");
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+ for (i = 0; i < length; i++) {
+ ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, command + i,
+ values[i]);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ }
+ ret = ds1307_read_block_data_once(client, command, length,
+ currvalues);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ } while (memcmp(currvalues, values, length));
+ return length;
+}
+
+/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
+
/*
* The IRQ logic includes a "real" handler running in IRQ context just
* long enough to schedule this workqueue entry. We need a task context
@@ -202,7 +279,7 @@ static int ds1307_get_time(struct device
int tmp;
/* read the RTC date and time registers all at once */
- tmp = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(ds1307->client,
+ tmp = ds1307->read_block_data(ds1307->client,
DS1307_REG_SECS, 7, ds1307->regs);
if (tmp != 7) {
dev_err(dev, "%s error %d\n", "read", tmp);
@@ -279,7 +356,7 @@ static int ds1307_set_time(struct device
"write", buf[0], buf[1], buf[2], buf[3],
buf[4], buf[5], buf[6]);
- result = i2c_smbus_write_i2c_block_data(ds1307->client, 0, 7, buf);
+ result = ds1307->write_block_data(ds1307->client, 0, 7, buf);
if (result < 0) {
dev_err(dev, "%s error %d\n", "write", result);
return result;
@@ -297,7 +374,7 @@ static int ds1307_read_alarm(struct devi
return -EINVAL;
/* read all ALARM1, ALARM2, and status registers at once */
- ret = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(client,
+ ret = ds1307->read_block_data(client,
DS1339_REG_ALARM1_SECS, 9, ds1307->regs);
if (ret != 9) {
dev_err(dev, "%s error %d\n", "alarm read", ret);
@@ -356,7 +433,7 @@ static int ds1307_set_alarm(struct devic
t->enabled, t->pending);
/* read current status of both alarms and the chip */
- ret = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(client,
+ ret = ds1307->read_block_data(client,
DS1339_REG_ALARM1_SECS, 9, buf);
if (ret != 9) {
dev_err(dev, "%s error %d\n", "alarm write", ret);
@@ -391,7 +468,7 @@ static int ds1307_set_alarm(struct devic
}
buf[8] = status & ~(DS1337_BIT_A1I | DS1337_BIT_A2I);
- ret = i2c_smbus_write_i2c_block_data(client,
+ ret = ds1307->write_block_data(client,
DS1339_REG_ALARM1_SECS, 9, buf);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(dev, "can't set alarm time\n");
@@ -479,7 +556,7 @@ ds1307_nvram_read(struct kobject *kobj,
if (unlikely(!count))
return count;
- result = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(client, 8 + off, count, buf);
+ result = ds1307->read_block_data(client, 8 + off, count, buf);
if (result < 0)
dev_err(&client->dev, "%s error %d\n", "nvram read", result);
return result;
@@ -490,9 +567,11 @@ ds1307_nvram_write(struct kobject *kobj,
char *buf, loff_t off, size_t count)
{
struct i2c_client *client;
+ struct ds1307 *ds1307;
int result;
client = kobj_to_i2c_client(kobj);
+ ds1307 = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
if (unlikely(off >= NVRAM_SIZE))
return -EFBIG;
@@ -501,7 +580,7 @@ ds1307_nvram_write(struct kobject *kobj,
if (unlikely(!count))
return count;
- result = i2c_smbus_write_i2c_block_data(client, 8 + off, count, buf);
+ result = ds1307->write_block_data(client, 8 + off, count, buf);
if (result < 0) {
dev_err(&client->dev, "%s error %d\n", "nvram write", result);
return result;
@@ -536,9 +615,8 @@ static int __devinit ds1307_probe(struct
int want_irq = false;
unsigned char *buf;
- if (!i2c_check_functionality(adapter,
- I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WRITE_BYTE_DATA |
- I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK))
+ if (!i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA)
+ && !i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK))
return -EIO;
if (!(ds1307 = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ds1307), GFP_KERNEL)))
@@ -548,6 +626,13 @@ static int __devinit ds1307_probe(struct
i2c_set_clientdata(client, ds1307);
ds1307->type = id->driver_data;
buf = ds1307->regs;
+ if (i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK)) {
+ ds1307->read_block_data = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data;
+ ds1307->write_block_data = i2c_smbus_write_i2c_block_data;
+ } else {
+ ds1307->read_block_data = ds1307_read_block_data;
+ ds1307->write_block_data = ds1307_write_block_data;
+ }
switch (ds1307->type) {
case ds_1337:
@@ -558,7 +643,7 @@ static int __devinit ds1307_probe(struct
want_irq = true;
}
/* get registers that the "rtc" read below won't read... */
- tmp = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(ds1307->client,
+ tmp = ds1307->read_block_data(ds1307->client,
DS1337_REG_CONTROL, 2, buf);
if (tmp != 2) {
pr_debug("read error %d\n", tmp);
@@ -596,7 +681,7 @@ static int __devinit ds1307_probe(struct
read_rtc:
/* read RTC registers */
- tmp = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(ds1307->client, 0, 8, buf);
+ tmp = ds1307->read_block_data(ds1307->client, 0, 8, buf);
if (tmp != 8) {
pr_debug("read error %d\n", tmp);
err = -EIO;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ed Swierk <eswierk@aristanetworks.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>,
Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
BARRE Sebastien <sbarre@sdelcc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc-ds1307: True SMBus compatibility
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:54:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1233006862.19874.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200901261306.21059.david-b@pacbell.net>
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 13:06 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> I have two patch format issues:
>
> - Always put a line of whitespace after variable
> declarations.
>
> - Include text like the above as part of the patch,
> even if you're stuck with a mailer that mangles
> non-attached text.
>
> You're using Evolution, which is mentioned in the
> Documentation/email-clients.txt file as having a
> way (albeit awkward) to send normal patch email.
>
> Given those changes:
>
> Acked-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
>
> Thanks.
Thanks for the feedback. Here you go:
Allow the rtc-ds1307 driver to work with SMBus controllers like nforce2
that do not support i2c block transfers.
Signed-off-by: Ed Swierk <eswierk@aristanetworks.com>
Index: linux-2.6.27.4/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.27.4.orig/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
+++ linux-2.6.27.4/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
@@ -94,6 +94,10 @@ struct ds1307 {
struct i2c_client *client;
struct rtc_device *rtc;
struct work_struct work;
+ s32 (*read_block_data)(struct i2c_client *client, u8 command,
+ u8 length, u8 *values);
+ s32 (*write_block_data)(struct i2c_client *client, u8 command,
+ u8 length, const u8 *values);
};
struct chip_desc {
@@ -132,6 +136,79 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ds1307_id);
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
+#define BLOCK_DATA_MAX_TRIES 10
+
+static s32 ds1307_read_block_data_once(struct i2c_client *client, u8 command,
+ u8 length, u8 *values)
+{
+ s32 i, data;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < length; i++) {
+ data = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, command + i);
+ if (data < 0)
+ return data;
+ values[i] = data;
+ }
+ return i;
+}
+
+static s32 ds1307_read_block_data(struct i2c_client *client, u8 command,
+ u8 length, u8 *values)
+{
+ u8 oldvalues[I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX];
+ s32 ret;
+ int tries = 0;
+
+ dev_dbg(&client->dev, "ds1307_read_block_data (length=%d)\n", length);
+ ret = ds1307_read_block_data_once(client, command, length, values);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ do {
+ if (++tries > BLOCK_DATA_MAX_TRIES) {
+ dev_err(&client->dev,
+ "ds1307_read_block_data failed\n");
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+ memcpy(oldvalues, values, length);
+ ret = ds1307_read_block_data_once(client, command, length,
+ values);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ } while (memcmp(oldvalues, values, length));
+ return length;
+}
+
+static s32 ds1307_write_block_data(struct i2c_client *client, u8 command,
+ u8 length, const u8 *values)
+{
+ u8 currvalues[I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX];
+ int tries = 0;
+
+ dev_dbg(&client->dev, "ds1307_write_block_data (length=%d)\n", length);
+ do {
+ s32 i, ret;
+
+ if (++tries > BLOCK_DATA_MAX_TRIES) {
+ dev_err(&client->dev,
+ "ds1307_write_block_data failed\n");
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+ for (i = 0; i < length; i++) {
+ ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, command + i,
+ values[i]);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ }
+ ret = ds1307_read_block_data_once(client, command, length,
+ currvalues);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ } while (memcmp(currvalues, values, length));
+ return length;
+}
+
+/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
+
/*
* The IRQ logic includes a "real" handler running in IRQ context just
* long enough to schedule this workqueue entry. We need a task context
@@ -202,7 +279,7 @@ static int ds1307_get_time(struct device
int tmp;
/* read the RTC date and time registers all at once */
- tmp = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(ds1307->client,
+ tmp = ds1307->read_block_data(ds1307->client,
DS1307_REG_SECS, 7, ds1307->regs);
if (tmp != 7) {
dev_err(dev, "%s error %d\n", "read", tmp);
@@ -279,7 +356,7 @@ static int ds1307_set_time(struct device
"write", buf[0], buf[1], buf[2], buf[3],
buf[4], buf[5], buf[6]);
- result = i2c_smbus_write_i2c_block_data(ds1307->client, 0, 7, buf);
+ result = ds1307->write_block_data(ds1307->client, 0, 7, buf);
if (result < 0) {
dev_err(dev, "%s error %d\n", "write", result);
return result;
@@ -297,7 +374,7 @@ static int ds1307_read_alarm(struct devi
return -EINVAL;
/* read all ALARM1, ALARM2, and status registers at once */
- ret = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(client,
+ ret = ds1307->read_block_data(client,
DS1339_REG_ALARM1_SECS, 9, ds1307->regs);
if (ret != 9) {
dev_err(dev, "%s error %d\n", "alarm read", ret);
@@ -356,7 +433,7 @@ static int ds1307_set_alarm(struct devic
t->enabled, t->pending);
/* read current status of both alarms and the chip */
- ret = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(client,
+ ret = ds1307->read_block_data(client,
DS1339_REG_ALARM1_SECS, 9, buf);
if (ret != 9) {
dev_err(dev, "%s error %d\n", "alarm write", ret);
@@ -391,7 +468,7 @@ static int ds1307_set_alarm(struct devic
}
buf[8] = status & ~(DS1337_BIT_A1I | DS1337_BIT_A2I);
- ret = i2c_smbus_write_i2c_block_data(client,
+ ret = ds1307->write_block_data(client,
DS1339_REG_ALARM1_SECS, 9, buf);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(dev, "can't set alarm time\n");
@@ -479,7 +556,7 @@ ds1307_nvram_read(struct kobject *kobj,
if (unlikely(!count))
return count;
- result = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(client, 8 + off, count, buf);
+ result = ds1307->read_block_data(client, 8 + off, count, buf);
if (result < 0)
dev_err(&client->dev, "%s error %d\n", "nvram read", result);
return result;
@@ -490,9 +567,11 @@ ds1307_nvram_write(struct kobject *kobj,
char *buf, loff_t off, size_t count)
{
struct i2c_client *client;
+ struct ds1307 *ds1307;
int result;
client = kobj_to_i2c_client(kobj);
+ ds1307 = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
if (unlikely(off >= NVRAM_SIZE))
return -EFBIG;
@@ -501,7 +580,7 @@ ds1307_nvram_write(struct kobject *kobj,
if (unlikely(!count))
return count;
- result = i2c_smbus_write_i2c_block_data(client, 8 + off, count, buf);
+ result = ds1307->write_block_data(client, 8 + off, count, buf);
if (result < 0) {
dev_err(&client->dev, "%s error %d\n", "nvram write", result);
return result;
@@ -536,9 +615,8 @@ static int __devinit ds1307_probe(struct
int want_irq = false;
unsigned char *buf;
- if (!i2c_check_functionality(adapter,
- I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WRITE_BYTE_DATA |
- I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK))
+ if (!i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA)
+ && !i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK))
return -EIO;
if (!(ds1307 = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ds1307), GFP_KERNEL)))
@@ -548,6 +626,13 @@ static int __devinit ds1307_probe(struct
i2c_set_clientdata(client, ds1307);
ds1307->type = id->driver_data;
buf = ds1307->regs;
+ if (i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK)) {
+ ds1307->read_block_data = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data;
+ ds1307->write_block_data = i2c_smbus_write_i2c_block_data;
+ } else {
+ ds1307->read_block_data = ds1307_read_block_data;
+ ds1307->write_block_data = ds1307_write_block_data;
+ }
switch (ds1307->type) {
case ds_1337:
@@ -558,7 +643,7 @@ static int __devinit ds1307_probe(struct
want_irq = true;
}
/* get registers that the "rtc" read below won't read... */
- tmp = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(ds1307->client,
+ tmp = ds1307->read_block_data(ds1307->client,
DS1337_REG_CONTROL, 2, buf);
if (tmp != 2) {
pr_debug("read error %d\n", tmp);
@@ -596,7 +681,7 @@ static int __devinit ds1307_probe(struct
read_rtc:
/* read RTC registers */
- tmp = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(ds1307->client, 0, 8, buf);
+ tmp = ds1307->read_block_data(ds1307->client, 0, 8, buf);
if (tmp != 8) {
pr_debug("read error %d\n", tmp);
err = -EIO;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-26 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-05 17:41 [PATCH] rtc-ds1307: True SMBus compatibility Ed Swierk
2009-01-05 17:41 ` Ed Swierk
2009-01-06 22:48 ` David Brownell
[not found] ` <1231177261.13443.20.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-07 13:24 ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-07 13:24 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20090107142426.4be04d4d-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-07 15:22 ` Ed Swierk
2009-01-07 15:22 ` Ed Swierk
[not found] ` <9ae48b020901070722l77bebc6boc8fa2fd0bcc8da28-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-07 15:27 ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-07 15:27 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20090107162709.755982c0-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-07 15:43 ` Ed Swierk
2009-01-07 15:43 ` Ed Swierk
[not found] ` <9ae48b020901070743x1a5eaf72k5314cd969dc580ef-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-07 15:49 ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-07 15:49 ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-19 23:59 ` Ed Swierk
2009-01-19 23:59 ` Ed Swierk
[not found] ` <1232409577.25123.11.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-20 10:43 ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-20 10:43 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20090120114304.3b956189-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-26 6:33 ` Ed Swierk
2009-01-26 6:33 ` Ed Swierk
[not found] ` <1232951630.1329.4.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-26 9:37 ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-26 9:37 ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-26 21:06 ` David Brownell
2009-01-26 21:06 ` David Brownell
[not found] ` <200901261306.21059.david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-26 21:54 ` Ed Swierk [this message]
2009-01-26 21:54 ` Ed Swierk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-05 17:36 Ed Swierk
2009-01-06 13:35 ` BARRE Sebastien
2009-01-06 22:06 ` Alessandro Zummo
[not found] ` <C1C62166118DFA4A8BBA01A2411F0D171224AECDC1-iGzfJtNnmHkUlixSki3fykIJAyBIbWHDnAJcWxkt5PDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-06 22:13 ` Ed Swierk
2009-01-06 22:13 ` Ed Swierk
2009-01-07 14:22 ` BARRE Sebastien
2009-01-07 14:22 ` BARRE Sebastien
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1233006862.19874.17.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=eswierk-bgarkanp9klv6pq1l3v1odbpr1lh4cv8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=a.zummo-BfzFCNDTiLLj+vYz1yj4TQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.