All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: michael@ellerman.id.au
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>,
	rjw@sisk.pl, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org,
	linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] PCI PM: Fix saving of device state in pci_legacy_suspend
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:29:23 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1233797363.4612.49.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1233795431.15714.13.camel@localhost>


> > Yup, missed that change in the patch. In fact, I even missed the
> > existence of a WARN_ONCE that takes those text arguments... baaaah. I
> > suppose I should try to read more of lkml :-)
> 
> But don't expect to see them on powerpc, they never make it to the
> console.

Allright, that's the problem with our implementation of WARN using a
conditional trap, we don't carry all the variable arguments for the
printf over.

I'm tempted to turn our implementation back to normal C code with an if
and a branch out of line, but Michael seems to say that even with
appropriate use of unlikely() etc... gcc decides to generate the worst
possible code every single time ...

<rant>
such as always inlining the whole printf mumbo jumbo and having the
not-warning case branch over it, not -all- CPUs have good branch
prediction dude, so the icache is going to scream but gcc folks know
better of course....
</rant>

Anyway, I'll see Michael what exactly the situation is here and if we
can fix it a way or another.

Ben.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-05  1:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-04  0:54 [PATCH 0/7] PCI PM: Fixes and refinements Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04  0:56 ` [PATCH 1/7] PCI PM: Fix handling of devices without drivers Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04  0:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04  1:53   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04  1:53   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04  2:23   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-04  2:49     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04 12:12       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 12:12       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04  2:49     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04 12:10     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 12:10     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04  2:23   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-04  0:57 ` [PATCH 2/7] PCI PM: Check if the state has been saved before trying to restore it Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04  0:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04  1:54   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04  1:54   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04  0:59 ` [PATCH 3/7] PCI PM: Fix saving of device state in pci_legacy_suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04  0:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04  1:56   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04  1:56   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04 10:14     ` Frans Pop
2009-02-04 10:14     ` Frans Pop
2009-02-04 21:38       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04 21:38       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04 21:53         ` Frans Pop
2009-02-04 21:53         ` Frans Pop
2009-02-04 21:56         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-04 21:56         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-05  0:40           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-05  0:40           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-05  0:57             ` Michael Ellerman
2009-02-05  1:29               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-05  1:29               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2009-02-05  2:58                 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-02-05  2:58                 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-02-05  4:06                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-05  4:06                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-05  0:57             ` Michael Ellerman
2009-02-04  1:00 ` [PATCH 4/7] PCI PCIe portdrv: Simplify suspend and resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04  1:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04  1:01 ` [PATCH 5/7] PCI PM: Do not disable and enable bridges during suspend-resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04  1:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04  1:02 ` [PATCH 6/7] PCI PM: Read power state from device after trying to change it on resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04  1:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04  1:09 ` [PATCH 7/7] PCI PM: Let the core be more careful with respect to drivers using new framework Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04  2:05   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04  2:05   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-05  0:47     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-05  0:47     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-05  1:18       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-05  1:18       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04  1:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-05  1:23 ` [PATCH 0/7] PCI PM: Fixes and refinements Jesse Barnes
2009-02-05  1:23 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-02-05  1:48   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-05  1:48   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1233797363.4612.49.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=elendil@planet.nl \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.