From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: michael@ellerman.id.au
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>,
rjw@sisk.pl, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] PCI PM: Fix saving of device state in pci_legacy_suspend
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:06:10 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1233806770.4612.68.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1233802690.15714.25.camel@localhost>
> Well I'm glad you listened to me when I told you not to fire off a rant
> email before I had another look at it ;)
>
> Because Arjan has patched the generic bug.h so that we at least get the
> printk on powerpc, and then use our version of __WARN().
Right. A deep breath later or two ... the current upstream code in
pci-driver.c doesn't have a message, which is why I didn't see it. The
-new- code from Rafael does, and it would work thanks to Arjan fix. Now
I should indeed stop listening to you telling me it's broken before I
get a chance to verify it :-)
> As far as the code gen, with gcc 4.3.1 (debian).
.../...
> So it's jumping over the if body, rather than moving it out of the
> straight line. It is hinting it right, so we should check if that helps
> us at all.
Right, gcc is full of sh*t as usual. Now try replacing the magic trap
which we still use in there, with a normal C function call (ie branch
out of line), see if it makes a difference. The trap statement uses an
inline asm statement and I know for a fact that the mere existence of
such a thing will make gcc already dubious idea of whether to go out of
line or not completely bonkers.
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-05 4:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-04 0:54 [PATCH 0/7] PCI PM: Fixes and refinements Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 0:56 ` [PATCH 1/7] PCI PM: Fix handling of devices without drivers Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 1:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04 1:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04 2:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-04 2:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04 2:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04 12:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 12:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 12:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 12:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 2:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-04 0:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 0:57 ` [PATCH 2/7] PCI PM: Check if the state has been saved before trying to restore it Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 1:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04 1:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04 0:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 0:59 ` [PATCH 3/7] PCI PM: Fix saving of device state in pci_legacy_suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 1:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04 1:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04 10:14 ` Frans Pop
2009-02-04 10:14 ` Frans Pop
2009-02-04 21:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04 21:53 ` Frans Pop
2009-02-04 21:53 ` Frans Pop
2009-02-04 21:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-04 21:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-05 0:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-05 0:57 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-02-05 0:57 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-02-05 1:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-05 2:58 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-02-05 4:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2009-02-05 4:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-05 2:58 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-02-05 1:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-05 0:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04 21:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04 0:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 1:00 ` [PATCH 4/7] PCI PCIe portdrv: Simplify suspend and resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 1:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 1:01 ` [PATCH 5/7] PCI PM: Do not disable and enable bridges during suspend-resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 1:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 1:02 ` [PATCH 6/7] PCI PM: Read power state from device after trying to change it on resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 1:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 1:09 ` [PATCH 7/7] PCI PM: Let the core be more careful with respect to drivers using new framework Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 1:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 2:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-05 0:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-05 0:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-05 1:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-05 1:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04 2:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-05 1:23 ` [PATCH 0/7] PCI PM: Fixes and refinements Jesse Barnes
2009-02-05 1:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-05 1:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-05 1:23 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1233806770.4612.68.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.