All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
	Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 microcode: work_on_cpu and cleanup of the synchronization logic
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 00:30:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1241649022.7811.35.camel@earth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1240439073.12721.23.camel@earth>

Version 4

V3 -> V4

Changes are based on suggestions/review by Hugh Dickins. Thanks a lot!


- update "cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part" with a remark
  regarding HT. From the high-level system's POV, HT threads (or cpu cores) look like
  separate logical cpus so no concurrent cpu_up/down() ops. are allowed.
  Hence, 'microcode_mutex' should be enough to cover even those cases when HT threads share 'msr' registers;

- return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu()
  and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code?

- report only a new revision in apply_microcode_intel(). The original revision is being printed out
  when microcode.ko is loaded.

The thread contains some other - possibly worthy - ideas, but these are likely subjects for other patches.

Tested only with updates via /dev/microcode and suspend/resume. However, there are no significant functional
changes since V3 so testing that has been done by Hugh should be still relevant.


V2 -> V3

- use smp_call_function_single() instead of work_on_cpu() as suggested by Ingo;
- add 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw,user}
- minor cleanups



From: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>

Subject: x86 microcode: smp_call_function_single() and cleanup of synchronization logic

* Solve an issue described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1
  in a different way, without resorting to set_cpus_allowed();

* in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run
  on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other.
  smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu.
   
* cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part

  The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu
  (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT)
  is being updated at any particular moment of time.

  In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts
  (the patch removes existing spinlocks).

  See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c.

* return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(),
  reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code?

* use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw,user} to
  gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate
  ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se).  

* some minor cleanups

Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing!


Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
CC: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CC: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
CC: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>
CC: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>

 arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h  |   19 ++-
 arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c   |   58 +++-----
 arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c  |  275 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c |   92 +++++--------
 4 files changed, 234 insertions(+), 210 deletions(-)

(there are ~20 new comment lines)


diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h
index c882664..251620b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h
@@ -9,14 +9,25 @@ struct cpu_signature {
 
 struct device;
 
+enum ucode_state { UCODE_ERROR, UCODE_OK, UCODE_NFOUND };
+
 struct microcode_ops {
-	int  (*request_microcode_user) (int cpu, const void __user *buf, size_t size);
-	int  (*request_microcode_fw) (int cpu, struct device *device);
+	enum ucode_state (*request_microcode_user) (int cpu,
+				const void __user *buf, size_t size);
 
-	void (*apply_microcode) (int cpu);
+	enum ucode_state (*request_microcode_fw) (int cpu,
+				struct device *device);
 
-	int  (*collect_cpu_info) (int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig);
 	void (*microcode_fini_cpu) (int cpu);
+
+	/* 
+	 * The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that
+	 * the callbacks below run on a target cpu when they
+	 * are being called.
+	 * See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c.
+	 */
+	int (*apply_microcode) (int cpu);
+	int (*collect_cpu_info) (int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig);
 };
 
 struct ucode_cpu_info {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
index 453b579..c8be20f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
@@ -13,25 +13,13 @@
  *  Licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
  *  License version 2. See file COPYING for details.
  */
-#include <linux/platform_device.h>
-#include <linux/capability.h>
-#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
 #include <linux/firmware.h>
-#include <linux/spinlock.h>
-#include <linux/cpumask.h>
 #include <linux/pci_ids.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
-#include <linux/mutex.h>
-#include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/slab.h>
-#include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/pci.h>
-#include <linux/fs.h>
-#include <linux/mm.h>
 
 #include <asm/microcode.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
@@ -79,9 +67,6 @@ struct microcode_amd {
 #define UCODE_CONTAINER_SECTION_HDR	8
 #define UCODE_CONTAINER_HEADER_SIZE	12
 
-/* serialize access to the physical write */
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(microcode_update_lock);
-
 static struct equiv_cpu_entry *equiv_cpu_table;
 
 static int collect_cpu_info_amd(int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig)
@@ -144,9 +129,8 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(int cpu, void *mc, int rev)
 	return 1;
 }
 
-static void apply_microcode_amd(int cpu)
+static int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu)
 {
-	unsigned long flags;
 	u32 rev, dummy;
 	int cpu_num = raw_smp_processor_id();
 	struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu_num;
@@ -156,25 +140,25 @@ static void apply_microcode_amd(int cpu)
 	BUG_ON(cpu_num != cpu);
 
 	if (mc_amd == NULL)
-		return;
+		return 0;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&microcode_update_lock, flags);
 	wrmsrl(MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LOADER, (u64)(long)&mc_amd->hdr.data_code);
 	/* get patch id after patching */
 	rdmsr(MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LEVEL, rev, dummy);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&microcode_update_lock, flags);
 
 	/* check current patch id and patch's id for match */
 	if (rev != mc_amd->hdr.patch_id) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d: update failed "
 		       "(for patch_level=0x%x)\n", cpu, mc_amd->hdr.patch_id);
-		return;
+		return -1;
 	}
 
 	printk(KERN_INFO "microcode: CPU%d: updated (new patch_level=0x%x)\n",
 	       cpu, rev);
 
 	uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int get_ucode_data(void *to, const u8 *from, size_t n)
@@ -263,7 +247,8 @@ static void free_equiv_cpu_table(void)
 	}
 }
 
-static int generic_load_microcode(int cpu, const u8 *data, size_t size)
+static enum ucode_state
+generic_load_microcode(int cpu, const u8 *data, size_t size)
 {
 	struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
 	const u8 *ucode_ptr = data;
@@ -272,12 +257,13 @@ static int generic_load_microcode(int cpu, const u8 *data, size_t size)
 	int new_rev = uci->cpu_sig.rev;
 	unsigned int leftover;
 	unsigned long offset;
+	enum ucode_state state = UCODE_OK;
 
 	offset = install_equiv_cpu_table(ucode_ptr);
 	if (!offset) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: failed to create "
 		       "equivalent cpu table\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
+		return UCODE_ERROR;
 	}
 
 	ucode_ptr += offset;
@@ -312,28 +298,27 @@ static int generic_load_microcode(int cpu, const u8 *data, size_t size)
 			pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d found a matching microcode "
 				 "update with version 0x%x (current=0x%x)\n",
 				 cpu, new_rev, uci->cpu_sig.rev);
-		} else
+		} else {
 			vfree(new_mc);
-	}
+			state = UCODE_ERROR;
+		}
+	} else
+		state = UCODE_NFOUND;
 
 	free_equiv_cpu_table();
 
-	return (int)leftover;
+	return state;
 }
 
-static int request_microcode_fw(int cpu, struct device *device)
+static enum ucode_state request_microcode_fw(int cpu, struct device *device)
 {
 	const char *fw_name = "amd-ucode/microcode_amd.bin";
 	const struct firmware *firmware;
-	int ret;
-
-	/* We should bind the task to the CPU */
-	BUG_ON(cpu != raw_smp_processor_id());
+	enum ucode_state ret;
 
-	ret = request_firmware(&firmware, fw_name, device);
-	if (ret) {
+	if (request_firmware(&firmware, fw_name, device)) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: failed to load file %s\n", fw_name);
-		return ret;
+		return UCODE_NFOUND;
 	}
 
 	ret = generic_load_microcode(cpu, firmware->data, firmware->size);
@@ -343,11 +328,12 @@ static int request_microcode_fw(int cpu, struct device *device)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int request_microcode_user(int cpu, const void __user *buf, size_t size)
+static enum ucode_state
+request_microcode_user(int cpu, const void __user *buf, size_t size)
 {
 	printk(KERN_INFO "microcode: AMD microcode update via "
 	       "/dev/cpu/microcode not supported\n");
-	return -1;
+	return UCODE_ERROR;
 }
 
 static void microcode_fini_cpu_amd(int cpu)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c
index 98c470c..ef1d884 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c
@@ -71,27 +71,18 @@
  *		Thanks to Stuart Swales for pointing out this bug.
  */
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
-#include <linux/capability.h>
 #include <linux/miscdevice.h>
-#include <linux/firmware.h>
+#include <linux/capability.h>
 #include <linux/smp_lock.h>
-#include <linux/spinlock.h>
-#include <linux/cpumask.h>
-#include <linux/uaccess.h>
-#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
-#include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/fs.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
 
 #include <asm/microcode.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
-#include <asm/msr.h>
 
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Microcode Update Driver");
 MODULE_AUTHOR("Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>");
@@ -101,36 +92,110 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 
 static struct microcode_ops	*microcode_ops;
 
-/* no concurrent ->write()s are allowed on /dev/cpu/microcode */
+/*
+ * Synchronization.
+ *
+ * All non cpu-hotplug-callback call sites use:
+ *
+ * - microcode_mutex to synchronize with each other;
+ * - get/put_online_cpus() to synchronize with
+ *   the cpu-hotplug-callback call sites.
+ *
+ * We guarantee that only a single cpu is being
+ * updated at any particular moment of time.
+ */
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(microcode_mutex);
 
 struct ucode_cpu_info		ucode_cpu_info[NR_CPUS];
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ucode_cpu_info);
 
+/*
+ * Operations that are run on a target cpu: 
+ */
+
+struct cpu_info_ctx {
+	struct cpu_signature	*cpu_sig;
+	int			err;
+};
+
+static void collect_cpu_info_local(void *arg)
+{
+	struct cpu_info_ctx *ctx = arg;
+
+	ctx->err = microcode_ops->collect_cpu_info(smp_processor_id(),
+						   ctx->cpu_sig);
+}
+
+static int collect_cpu_info_on_target(int cpu, struct cpu_signature *cpu_sig)
+{
+	struct cpu_info_ctx ctx = { .cpu_sig = cpu_sig, .err = 0 };
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, collect_cpu_info_local, &ctx, 1);
+	if (!ret)
+		ret = ctx.err;
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu)
+{
+	struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
+	int ret;
+
+	memset(uci, 0, sizeof(*uci));
+
+	ret = collect_cpu_info_on_target(cpu, &uci->cpu_sig);
+	if (!ret)
+		uci->valid = 1;
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+struct apply_microcode_ctx {
+	int err;
+};
+
+static void apply_microcode_local(void *arg)
+{
+	struct apply_microcode_ctx *ctx = arg;
+
+	ctx->err = microcode_ops->apply_microcode(smp_processor_id());
+}
+
+static int apply_microcode_on_target(int cpu)
+{
+	struct apply_microcode_ctx ctx = { .err = 0 };
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, apply_microcode_local, &ctx, 1);
+	if (!ret)
+		ret = ctx.err;
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_MICROCODE_OLD_INTERFACE
 static int do_microcode_update(const void __user *buf, size_t size)
 {
-	cpumask_t old;
 	int error = 0;
 	int cpu;
 
-	old = current->cpus_allowed;
-
 	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
 		struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
+		enum ucode_state ustate;
 
 		if (!uci->valid)
 			continue;
 
-		set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &cpumask_of_cpu(cpu));
-		error = microcode_ops->request_microcode_user(cpu, buf, size);
-		if (error < 0)
-			goto out;
-		if (!error)
-			microcode_ops->apply_microcode(cpu);
+		ustate = microcode_ops->request_microcode_user(cpu, buf, size);
+		if (ustate == UCODE_ERROR) {
+			error = -1;
+			break;
+		} else if (ustate == UCODE_OK)
+			apply_microcode_on_target(cpu);
 	}
-out:
-	set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &old);
+
 	return error;
 }
 
@@ -143,19 +208,18 @@ static int microcode_open(struct inode *unused1, struct file *unused2)
 static ssize_t microcode_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
 			       size_t len, loff_t *ppos)
 {
-	ssize_t ret;
+	ssize_t ret = -EINVAL;
 
 	if ((len >> PAGE_SHIFT) > num_physpages) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: too much data (max %ld pages)\n",
 		       num_physpages);
-		return -EINVAL;
+		return ret;
 	}
 
 	get_online_cpus();
 	mutex_lock(&microcode_mutex);
 
-	ret = do_microcode_update(buf, len);
-	if (!ret)
+	if (do_microcode_update(buf, len) == 0)
 		ret = (ssize_t)len;
 
 	mutex_unlock(&microcode_mutex);
@@ -205,19 +269,22 @@ MODULE_ALIAS_MISCDEV(MICROCODE_MINOR);
 /* fake device for request_firmware */
 static struct platform_device	*microcode_pdev;
 
-static long reload_for_cpu(void *unused)
+static int reload_for_cpu(int cpu)
 {
-	struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + smp_processor_id();
+	struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
 	int err = 0;
 
 	mutex_lock(&microcode_mutex);
 	if (uci->valid) {
-		err = microcode_ops->request_microcode_fw(smp_processor_id(),
-							  &microcode_pdev->dev);
-		if (!err)
-			microcode_ops->apply_microcode(smp_processor_id());
+		enum ucode_state ustate = microcode_ops->request_microcode_fw(cpu,
+						&microcode_pdev->dev);
+		if (ustate == UCODE_OK)
+			apply_microcode_on_target(cpu);
+		else if (ustate == UCODE_ERROR)
+			err = -EINVAL;
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&microcode_mutex);
+
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -227,7 +294,7 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct sys_device *dev,
 {
 	char *end;
 	unsigned long val = simple_strtoul(buf, &end, 0);
-	int err = 0;
+	int ret = 0;
 	int cpu = dev->id;
 
 	if (end == buf)
@@ -235,12 +302,13 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct sys_device *dev,
 	if (val == 1) {
 		get_online_cpus();
 		if (cpu_online(cpu))
-			err = work_on_cpu(cpu, reload_for_cpu, NULL);
+			ret = reload_for_cpu(cpu);
 		put_online_cpus();
 	}
-	if (err)
-		return err;
-	return sz;
+	if (!ret)
+		ret = sz;
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static ssize_t version_show(struct sys_device *dev,
@@ -275,7 +343,7 @@ static struct attribute_group mc_attr_group = {
 	.name		= "microcode",
 };
 
-static void __microcode_fini_cpu(int cpu)
+static void microcode_fini_cpu(int cpu)
 {
 	struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
 
@@ -283,103 +351,68 @@ static void __microcode_fini_cpu(int cpu)
 	uci->valid = 0;
 }
 
-static void microcode_fini_cpu(int cpu)
-{
-	mutex_lock(&microcode_mutex);
-	__microcode_fini_cpu(cpu);
-	mutex_unlock(&microcode_mutex);
-}
-
-static void collect_cpu_info(int cpu)
+static enum ucode_state microcode_resume_cpu(int cpu)
 {
 	struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
 
-	memset(uci, 0, sizeof(*uci));
-	if (!microcode_ops->collect_cpu_info(cpu, &uci->cpu_sig))
-		uci->valid = 1;
+	if (!uci->mc)
+		return UCODE_NFOUND;
+
+	pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d updated upon resume\n", cpu);
+	apply_microcode_on_target(cpu);
+
+	return UCODE_OK;
 }
 
-static int microcode_resume_cpu(int cpu)
+static enum ucode_state microcode_init_cpu(int cpu)
 {
-	struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
-	struct cpu_signature nsig;
+	enum ucode_state ustate;
 
-	pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d resumed\n", cpu);
+	if (collect_cpu_info(cpu))
+		return UCODE_ERROR;
 
-	if (!uci->mc)
-		return 1;
+	/* --dimm. Trigger a delayed update? */
+	if (system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING)
+		return UCODE_NFOUND;
 
-	/*
-	 * Let's verify that the 'cached' ucode does belong
-	 * to this cpu (a bit of paranoia):
-	 */
-	if (microcode_ops->collect_cpu_info(cpu, &nsig)) {
-		__microcode_fini_cpu(cpu);
-		printk(KERN_ERR "failed to collect_cpu_info for resuming cpu #%d\n",
-				cpu);
-		return -1;
-	}
+	ustate = microcode_ops->request_microcode_fw(cpu, &microcode_pdev->dev);
 
-	if ((nsig.sig != uci->cpu_sig.sig) || (nsig.pf != uci->cpu_sig.pf)) {
-		__microcode_fini_cpu(cpu);
-		printk(KERN_ERR "cached ucode doesn't match the resuming cpu #%d\n",
-				cpu);
-		/* Should we look for a new ucode here? */
-		return 1;
+	if (ustate == UCODE_OK) {
+		pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d updated upon init\n", cpu);
+		apply_microcode_on_target(cpu);
 	}
 
-	return 0;
+	return ustate;
 }
 
-static long microcode_update_cpu(void *unused)
+static enum ucode_state microcode_update_cpu(int cpu)
 {
-	struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + smp_processor_id();
-	int err = 0;
-
-	/*
-	 * Check if the system resume is in progress (uci->valid != NULL),
-	 * otherwise just request a firmware:
-	 */
-	if (uci->valid) {
-		err = microcode_resume_cpu(smp_processor_id());
-	} else {
-		collect_cpu_info(smp_processor_id());
-		if (uci->valid && system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING)
-			err = microcode_ops->request_microcode_fw(
-					smp_processor_id(),
-					&microcode_pdev->dev);
-	}
-	if (!err)
-		microcode_ops->apply_microcode(smp_processor_id());
-	return err;
-}
+	struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
+	enum ucode_state ustate;
 
-static int microcode_init_cpu(int cpu)
-{
-	int err;
-	mutex_lock(&microcode_mutex);
-	err = work_on_cpu(cpu, microcode_update_cpu, NULL);
-	mutex_unlock(&microcode_mutex);
+	if (uci->valid)
+		ustate = microcode_resume_cpu(cpu);
+	else
+		ustate = microcode_init_cpu(cpu);
 
-	return err;
+	return ustate;
 }
 
 static int mc_sysdev_add(struct sys_device *sys_dev)
 {
 	int err, cpu = sys_dev->id;
-	struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
 
 	if (!cpu_online(cpu))
 		return 0;
 
 	pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d added\n", cpu);
-	memset(uci, 0, sizeof(*uci));
 
 	err = sysfs_create_group(&sys_dev->kobj, &mc_attr_group);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	err = microcode_init_cpu(cpu);
+	if (microcode_init_cpu(cpu) == UCODE_ERROR)
+		err = -EINVAL;
 
 	return err;
 }
@@ -400,12 +433,23 @@ static int mc_sysdev_remove(struct sys_device *sys_dev)
 static int mc_sysdev_resume(struct sys_device *dev)
 {
 	int cpu = dev->id;
+	struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
 
 	if (!cpu_online(cpu))
 		return 0;
 
-	/* only CPU 0 will apply ucode here */
-	microcode_update_cpu(NULL);
+	/*
+	 * All non-bootup cpus are still disabled,
+	 * so only CPU 0 will apply ucode here.
+	 *
+	 * Moreover, there can be no concurrent
+	 * updates from any other places at this point.
+	 */
+	WARN_ON(cpu != 0);
+
+	if (uci->valid && uci->mc)
+		microcode_ops->apply_microcode(cpu);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -425,9 +469,7 @@ mc_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
 	switch (action) {
 	case CPU_ONLINE:
 	case CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN:
-		if (microcode_init_cpu(cpu))
-			printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: failed to init CPU%d\n",
-			       cpu);
+		microcode_update_cpu(cpu);
 	case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
 	case CPU_DOWN_FAILED_FROZEN:
 		pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d added\n", cpu);
@@ -469,9 +511,6 @@ static int __init microcode_init(void)
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
-	error = microcode_dev_init();
-	if (error)
-		return error;
 	microcode_pdev = platform_device_register_simple("microcode", -1,
 							 NULL, 0);
 	if (IS_ERR(microcode_pdev)) {
@@ -480,14 +519,22 @@ static int __init microcode_init(void)
 	}
 
 	get_online_cpus();
+	mutex_lock(&microcode_mutex);
+
 	error = sysdev_driver_register(&cpu_sysdev_class, &mc_sysdev_driver);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&microcode_mutex);
 	put_online_cpus();
+
 	if (error) {
-		microcode_dev_exit();
 		platform_device_unregister(microcode_pdev);
 		return error;
 	}
 
+	error = microcode_dev_init();
+	if (error)
+		return error;
+
 	register_hotcpu_notifier(&mc_cpu_notifier);
 
 	printk(KERN_INFO
@@ -505,7 +552,11 @@ static void __exit microcode_exit(void)
 	unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&mc_cpu_notifier);
 
 	get_online_cpus();
+	mutex_lock(&microcode_mutex);
+
 	sysdev_driver_unregister(&cpu_sysdev_class, &mc_sysdev_driver);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&microcode_mutex);
 	put_online_cpus();
 
 	platform_device_unregister(microcode_pdev);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c
index 149b9ec..97eb057 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c
@@ -70,24 +70,11 @@
  *		Fix sigmatch() macro to handle old CPUs with pf == 0.
  *		Thanks to Stuart Swales for pointing out this bug.
  */
-#include <linux/platform_device.h>
-#include <linux/capability.h>
-#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
 #include <linux/firmware.h>
-#include <linux/smp_lock.h>
-#include <linux/spinlock.h>
-#include <linux/cpumask.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
-#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
-#include <linux/mutex.h>
-#include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/slab.h>
-#include <linux/cpu.h>
-#include <linux/fs.h>
-#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
 
 #include <asm/microcode.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
@@ -150,13 +137,9 @@ struct extended_sigtable {
 
 #define exttable_size(et) ((et)->count * EXT_SIGNATURE_SIZE + EXT_HEADER_SIZE)
 
-/* serialize access to the physical write to MSR 0x79 */
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(microcode_update_lock);
-
 static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
 {
 	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu_num);
-	unsigned long flags;
 	unsigned int val[2];
 
 	memset(csig, 0, sizeof(*csig));
@@ -176,18 +159,14 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
 		csig->pf = 1 << ((val[1] >> 18) & 7);
 	}
 
-	/* serialize access to the physical write to MSR 0x79 */
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&microcode_update_lock, flags);
-
 	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
 	/* see notes above for revision 1.07.  Apparent chip bug */
 	sync_core();
 	/* get the current revision from MSR 0x8B */
 	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, val[0], csig->rev);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&microcode_update_lock, flags);
 
-	pr_debug("microcode: collect_cpu_info : sig=0x%x, pf=0x%x, rev=0x%x\n",
-			csig->sig, csig->pf, csig->rev);
+	printk(KERN_INFO "microcode: CPU%d sig=0x%x, pf=0x%x, revision=0x%x\n",
+			cpu_num, csig->sig, csig->pf, csig->rev);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -200,7 +179,7 @@ static inline int update_match_cpu(struct cpu_signature *csig, int sig, int pf)
 static inline int
 update_match_revision(struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header, int rev)
 {
-	return (mc_header->rev <= rev) ? 0 : 1;
+	return (mc_header->rev < rev) ? 0 : 1;
 }
 
 static int microcode_sanity_check(void *mc)
@@ -318,11 +297,10 @@ get_matching_microcode(struct cpu_signature *cpu_sig, void *mc, int rev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void apply_microcode(int cpu)
+static int apply_microcode(int cpu)
 {
 	struct microcode_intel *mc_intel;
 	struct ucode_cpu_info *uci;
-	unsigned long flags;
 	unsigned int val[2];
 	int cpu_num;
 
@@ -334,10 +312,7 @@ static void apply_microcode(int cpu)
 	BUG_ON(cpu_num != cpu);
 
 	if (mc_intel == NULL)
-		return;
-
-	/* serialize access to the physical write to MSR 0x79 */
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&microcode_update_lock, flags);
+		return 0;
 
 	/* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */
 	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE,
@@ -351,30 +326,32 @@ static void apply_microcode(int cpu)
 	/* get the current revision from MSR 0x8B */
 	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, val[0], val[1]);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&microcode_update_lock, flags);
 	if (val[1] != mc_intel->hdr.rev) {
-		printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d update from revision "
-				"0x%x to 0x%x failed\n",
-			cpu_num, uci->cpu_sig.rev, val[1]);
-		return;
+		printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d update "
+				"to revision 0x%x failed\n",
+			cpu_num, mc_intel->hdr.rev);
+		return -1;
 	}
-	printk(KERN_INFO "microcode: CPU%d updated from revision "
-			 "0x%x to 0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x \n",
-		cpu_num, uci->cpu_sig.rev, val[1],
+	printk(KERN_INFO "microcode: CPU%d updated to revision "
+			 "0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x \n",
+		cpu_num, val[1],
 		mc_intel->hdr.date & 0xffff,
 		mc_intel->hdr.date >> 24,
 		(mc_intel->hdr.date >> 16) & 0xff);
 
 	uci->cpu_sig.rev = val[1];
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
-static int generic_load_microcode(int cpu, void *data, size_t size,
-		int (*get_ucode_data)(void *, const void *, size_t))
+static enum ucode_state generic_load_microcode(int cpu, void *data, size_t size,
+				int (*get_ucode_data)(void *, const void *, size_t))
 {
 	struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
 	u8 *ucode_ptr = data, *new_mc = NULL, *mc;
 	int new_rev = uci->cpu_sig.rev;
 	unsigned int leftover = size;
+	enum ucode_state state = UCODE_OK;
 
 	while (leftover) {
 		struct microcode_header_intel mc_header;
@@ -412,11 +389,15 @@ static int generic_load_microcode(int cpu, void *data, size_t size,
 		leftover  -= mc_size;
 	}
 
-	if (!new_mc)
+	if (leftover) {
+		if (new_mc)
+			vfree(new_mc);
+		state = UCODE_ERROR;
 		goto out;
+	}
 
-	if (leftover) {
-		vfree(new_mc);
+	if (!new_mc) {
+		state = UCODE_NFOUND;
 		goto out;
 	}
 
@@ -427,9 +408,8 @@ static int generic_load_microcode(int cpu, void *data, size_t size,
 	pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d found a matching microcode update with"
 		 " version 0x%x (current=0x%x)\n",
 			cpu, new_rev, uci->cpu_sig.rev);
-
- out:
-	return (int)leftover;
+out:
+	return state;
 }
 
 static int get_ucode_fw(void *to, const void *from, size_t n)
@@ -438,21 +418,19 @@ static int get_ucode_fw(void *to, const void *from, size_t n)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int request_microcode_fw(int cpu, struct device *device)
+static enum ucode_state request_microcode_fw(int cpu, struct device *device)
 {
 	char name[30];
 	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
 	const struct firmware *firmware;
-	int ret;
+	enum ucode_state ret;
 
-	/* We should bind the task to the CPU */
-	BUG_ON(cpu != raw_smp_processor_id());
 	sprintf(name, "intel-ucode/%02x-%02x-%02x",
 		c->x86, c->x86_model, c->x86_mask);
-	ret = request_firmware(&firmware, name, device);
-	if (ret) {
+
+	if (request_firmware(&firmware, name, device)) {
 		pr_debug("microcode: data file %s load failed\n", name);
-		return ret;
+		return UCODE_NFOUND;
 	}
 
 	ret = generic_load_microcode(cpu, (void *)firmware->data,
@@ -468,11 +446,9 @@ static int get_ucode_user(void *to, const void *from, size_t n)
 	return copy_from_user(to, from, n);
 }
 
-static int request_microcode_user(int cpu, const void __user *buf, size_t size)
+static enum ucode_state
+request_microcode_user(int cpu, const void __user *buf, size_t size)
 {
-	/* We should bind the task to the CPU */
-	BUG_ON(cpu != raw_smp_processor_id());
-
 	return generic_load_microcode(cpu, (void *)buf, size, &get_ucode_user);
 }
 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-05-06 22:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-20 20:16 [PATCH] x86 microcode: work_on_cpu and cleanup of the synchronization logic Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-21  8:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-21 20:07 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-21 20:09   ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-22 10:18   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-22 10:33     ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-22 10:36       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-22 10:34   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-22 22:24   ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-23  8:27     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-23  8:55       ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-23 18:03         ` Hugh Dickins
2009-04-23 22:16           ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-24 12:23             ` Hugh Dickins
2009-04-24 14:11               ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-24 15:30                 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-04-24 17:01                 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-24 18:00                   ` Hugh Dickins
2009-04-25 10:30                     ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-05-06 22:30     ` Dmitry Adamushko [this message]
2009-05-07  8:08       ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-05-11 21:48       ` [PATCH, -tip] x86 microcode: smp_call_function_single() instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of sync. logic Dmitry Adamushko
2009-05-12  8:27         ` [tip:x86/microcode] x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic tip-bot for Dmitry Adamushko
2009-05-12  8:39         ` tip-bot for Dmitry Adamushko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1241649022.7811.35.camel@earth \
    --to=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peter.oruba@amd.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.