All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
	Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 microcode: work_on_cpu and cleanup of the synchronization logic
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:27:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090423082704.GD599@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1240439073.12721.23.camel@earth>


* Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> wrote:

> Version 3
> 
> diff with v.2
> 
> - use smp_call_function_single() instead of work_on_cpu() as suggested by Ingo;
> - add 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw,user}
> - minor cleanups

This version looks really nice structurally. What type of testing 
have you done on the patch, on what CPU type?

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-23  8:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-20 20:16 [PATCH] x86 microcode: work_on_cpu and cleanup of the synchronization logic Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-21  8:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-21 20:07 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-21 20:09   ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-22 10:18   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-22 10:33     ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-22 10:36       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-22 10:34   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-22 22:24   ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-23  8:27     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-04-23  8:55       ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-23 18:03         ` Hugh Dickins
2009-04-23 22:16           ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-24 12:23             ` Hugh Dickins
2009-04-24 14:11               ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-24 15:30                 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-04-24 17:01                 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-24 18:00                   ` Hugh Dickins
2009-04-25 10:30                     ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-05-06 22:30     ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-05-07  8:08       ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-05-11 21:48       ` [PATCH, -tip] x86 microcode: smp_call_function_single() instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of sync. logic Dmitry Adamushko
2009-05-12  8:27         ` [tip:x86/microcode] x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic tip-bot for Dmitry Adamushko
2009-05-12  8:39         ` tip-bot for Dmitry Adamushko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090423082704.GD599@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.oruba@amd.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.