From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 microcode: work_on_cpu and cleanup of the synchronization logic
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:29:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090421082958.GD12512@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1240258569.6195.8.camel@earth>
* Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
> Subject: x86 microcode: work_on_cpu and cleanup of the synchronization logic
Note, this does not apply cleanly to latest -git anymore, due to
this fixlet for the warnings:
0917798: x86: fix microcode driver newly spewing warnings
Mind resending with that resolved?
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h
( Patch submission nitpick: please always include a diffstat. Thanks! )
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-21 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-20 20:16 [PATCH] x86 microcode: work_on_cpu and cleanup of the synchronization logic Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-21 8:29 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-04-21 20:07 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-21 20:09 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-22 10:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-22 10:33 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-22 10:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-22 10:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-22 22:24 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-23 8:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-23 8:55 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-23 18:03 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-04-23 22:16 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-24 12:23 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-04-24 14:11 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-24 15:30 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-04-24 17:01 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-24 18:00 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-04-25 10:30 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-05-06 22:30 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-05-07 8:08 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-05-11 21:48 ` [PATCH, -tip] x86 microcode: smp_call_function_single() instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of sync. logic Dmitry Adamushko
2009-05-12 8:27 ` [tip:x86/microcode] x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic tip-bot for Dmitry Adamushko
2009-05-12 8:39 ` tip-bot for Dmitry Adamushko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090421082958.GD12512@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.oruba@amd.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.