All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk-4UpuNZONu4c@public.gmane.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney"
	<paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
	netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	dougthompson-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
	bluesmoke-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
	axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber-dcUjhNyLwpNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>,
	christine.caulfield-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org,
	Trond.Myklebust-HgOvQuBEEgTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	yoshfuji-VfPWfsRibaP+Ru+s062T9g@public.gmane.org,
	shemminger-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
	linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
	neilb-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org,
	linux-ext4-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org,
	adilger-xsfywfwIY+M@public.gmane.org,
	netfilter-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] mac80211: Use rcu_barrier() on unload.
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:06:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1245837965.6695.45.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1245770155.21314.38.camel-YfaajirXv2244ywRPIzf9A@public.gmane.org>

On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 17:15 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 17:04 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > The mac80211 module uses rcu_call() thus it should use rcu_barrier()
> > on module unload.
> > 
> > I'm having a hardtime verifying that no more call_rcu() callbacks can
> > be schedules in the module unload path.  Could a maintainer please
> > look into this?
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk-4UpuNZONu4c@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> > 
> >  net/mac80211/main.c |    2 ++
> >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/mac80211/main.c b/net/mac80211/main.c
> > index 092a017..e9f70ce 100644
> > --- a/net/mac80211/main.c
> > +++ b/net/mac80211/main.c
> > @@ -1100,6 +1100,8 @@ static void __exit ieee80211_exit(void)
> >  		ieee80211s_stop();
> >  
> >  	ieee80211_debugfs_netdev_exit();
> > +
> > +	rcu_barrier(); /* Wait for completion of call_rcu()'s */
> >  }
> 
> I don't think this is correct at all -- note that call_rcu() is done in
> some of the mesh code, so I would think you need to do this in
> ieee80211_stop() since the call_rcu() code requires the interface to
> still be around. And when it's stopped everything should be idle.

Should it then not be in mesh.c ieee80211_stop_mesh().  We can replace
the synchronize_rcu() in this function with a rcu_barrier().

> I can fix it later, but I'm deep in some other stuff right now.

Yes, I noticed you seem quite active :-)
I can also do a repost... what about the patch below?

-- 
Med venlig hilsen / Best regards
  Jesper Brouer
  ComX Networks A/S
  Linux Network developer
  Cand. Scient Datalog / MSc.
  Author of http://adsl-optimizer.dk
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer


[PATCH v2 03/10] mac80211: Use rcu_barrier() on unload.

From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk-4UpuNZONu4c@public.gmane.org>

The mac80211 module uses rcu_call() thus it should use rcu_barrier()
on module unload.

The rcu_barrier() is placed in mech.c ieee80211_stop_mesh() which is
invoked from ieee80211_stop() in case vif.type == NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT.

Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk-4UpuNZONu4c@public.gmane.org>
---

 net/mac80211/mesh.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)


diff --git a/net/mac80211/mesh.c b/net/mac80211/mesh.c
index fc712e6..11cf45b 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/mesh.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/mesh.c
@@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ void ieee80211_stop_mesh(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata)
 	 * should it be using the interface and enqueuing
 	 * frames at this very time on another CPU.
 	 */
-	synchronize_rcu();
+	rcu_barrier(); /* Wait for RX path and call_rcu()'s */
 	skb_queue_purge(&sdata->u.mesh.skb_queue);
 }
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk-4UpuNZONu4c@public.gmane.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dougthompson@xmission.com, bluesmoke-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	axboe@kernel.dk, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	christine.caulfield@googlemail.com, Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org,
	shemminger@linux-foundation.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	bfields@fieldses.org, neilb@suse.de, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	tytso@mit.edu, adilger-xsfywfwIY+M@public.gmane.org,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] mac80211: Use rcu_barrier() on unload.
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:06:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1245837965.6695.45.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1245770155.21314.38.camel-YfaajirXv2244ywRPIzf9A@public.gmane.org>

On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 17:15 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 17:04 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > The mac80211 module uses rcu_call() thus it should use rcu_barrier()
> > on module unload.
> > 
> > I'm having a hardtime verifying that no more call_rcu() callbacks can
> > be schedules in the module unload path.  Could a maintainer please
> > look into this?
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk-4UpuNZONu4c@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> > 
> >  net/mac80211/main.c |    2 ++
> >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/mac80211/main.c b/net/mac80211/main.c
> > index 092a017..e9f70ce 100644
> > --- a/net/mac80211/main.c
> > +++ b/net/mac80211/main.c
> > @@ -1100,6 +1100,8 @@ static void __exit ieee80211_exit(void)
> >  		ieee80211s_stop();
> >  
> >  	ieee80211_debugfs_netdev_exit();
> > +
> > +	rcu_barrier(); /* Wait for completion of call_rcu()'s */
> >  }
> 
> I don't think this is correct at all -- note that call_rcu() is done in
> some of the mesh code, so I would think you need to do this in
> ieee80211_stop() since the call_rcu() code requires the interface to
> still be around. And when it's stopped everything should be idle.

Should it then not be in mesh.c ieee80211_stop_mesh().  We can replace
the synchronize_rcu() in this function with a rcu_barrier().

> I can fix it later, but I'm deep in some other stuff right now.

Yes, I noticed you seem quite active :-)
I can also do a repost... what about the patch below?

-- 
Med venlig hilsen / Best regards
  Jesper Brouer
  ComX Networks A/S
  Linux Network developer
  Cand. Scient Datalog / MSc.
  Author of http://adsl-optimizer.dk
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer


[PATCH v2 03/10] mac80211: Use rcu_barrier() on unload.

From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk-4UpuNZONu4c@public.gmane.org>

The mac80211 module uses rcu_call() thus it should use rcu_barrier()
on module unload.

The rcu_barrier() is placed in mech.c ieee80211_stop_mesh() which is
invoked from ieee80211_stop() in case vif.type == NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT.

Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk-4UpuNZONu4c@public.gmane.org>
---

 net/mac80211/mesh.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)


diff --git a/net/mac80211/mesh.c b/net/mac80211/mesh.c
index fc712e6..11cf45b 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/mesh.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/mesh.c
@@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ void ieee80211_stop_mesh(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata)
 	 * should it be using the interface and enqueuing
 	 * frames at this very time on another CPU.
 	 */
-	synchronize_rcu();
+	rcu_barrier(); /* Wait for RX path and call_rcu()'s */
 	skb_queue_purge(&sdata->u.mesh.skb_queue);
 }
 



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@comx.dk>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dougthompson@xmission.com, bluesmoke-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	axboe@kernel.dk, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	christine.caulfield@googlemail.com, Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org,
	shemminger@linux-foundation.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	bfields@fieldses.org, neilb@suse.de, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	tytso@mit.edu, adilger@sun.com, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] mac80211: Use rcu_barrier() on unload.
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:06:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1245837965.6695.45.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1245770155.21314.38.camel@johannes.local>

On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 17:15 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 17:04 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > The mac80211 module uses rcu_call() thus it should use rcu_barrier()
> > on module unload.
> > 
> > I'm having a hardtime verifying that no more call_rcu() callbacks can
> > be schedules in the module unload path.  Could a maintainer please
> > look into this?
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@comx.dk>
> > ---
> > 
> >  net/mac80211/main.c |    2 ++
> >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/mac80211/main.c b/net/mac80211/main.c
> > index 092a017..e9f70ce 100644
> > --- a/net/mac80211/main.c
> > +++ b/net/mac80211/main.c
> > @@ -1100,6 +1100,8 @@ static void __exit ieee80211_exit(void)
> >  		ieee80211s_stop();
> >  
> >  	ieee80211_debugfs_netdev_exit();
> > +
> > +	rcu_barrier(); /* Wait for completion of call_rcu()'s */
> >  }
> 
> I don't think this is correct at all -- note that call_rcu() is done in
> some of the mesh code, so I would think you need to do this in
> ieee80211_stop() since the call_rcu() code requires the interface to
> still be around. And when it's stopped everything should be idle.

Should it then not be in mesh.c ieee80211_stop_mesh().  We can replace
the synchronize_rcu() in this function with a rcu_barrier().

> I can fix it later, but I'm deep in some other stuff right now.

Yes, I noticed you seem quite active :-)
I can also do a repost... what about the patch below?

-- 
Med venlig hilsen / Best regards
  Jesper Brouer
  ComX Networks A/S
  Linux Network developer
  Cand. Scient Datalog / MSc.
  Author of http://adsl-optimizer.dk
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer


[PATCH v2 03/10] mac80211: Use rcu_barrier() on unload.

From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@comx.dk>

The mac80211 module uses rcu_call() thus it should use rcu_barrier()
on module unload.

The rcu_barrier() is placed in mech.c ieee80211_stop_mesh() which is
invoked from ieee80211_stop() in case vif.type == NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT.

Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@comx.dk>
---

 net/mac80211/mesh.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)


diff --git a/net/mac80211/mesh.c b/net/mac80211/mesh.c
index fc712e6..11cf45b 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/mesh.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/mesh.c
@@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ void ieee80211_stop_mesh(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata)
 	 * should it be using the interface and enqueuing
 	 * frames at this very time on another CPU.
 	 */
-	synchronize_rcu();
+	rcu_barrier(); /* Wait for RX path and call_rcu()'s */
 	skb_queue_purge(&sdata->u.mesh.skb_queue);
 }
 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-24 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-23 15:03 [PATCH 00/10] We must use rcu_barrier() on module unload Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 15:03 ` [PATCH 01/10] ext4: Use " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-07-06  2:31   ` Theodore Tso
2009-07-06  2:31     ` Theodore Tso
2009-07-06  2:31     ` Theodore Tso
2009-06-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 02/10] bridge: Use rcu_barrier() instead of syncronize_net() on unload Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 03/10] mac80211: Use rcu_barrier() " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 15:15   ` Johannes Berg
     [not found]     ` <1245770155.21314.38.camel-YfaajirXv2244ywRPIzf9A@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-24 10:06       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2009-06-24 10:06         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-24 10:06         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-24 10:21         ` Johannes Berg
     [not found]           ` <1245838862.21314.48.camel-YfaajirXv2244ywRPIzf9A@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-24 11:32             ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-24 11:32               ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-24 11:32               ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-24 11:39               ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 04/10] sunrpc: " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 16:59   ` Trond Myklebust
2009-06-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 05/10] nfs: Use rcu_barrier() on module unload Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 15:04   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 15:04   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 06/10] ipv6: " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 15:04   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 15:04   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 07/10] decnet: " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-24  6:23   ` Chrissie Caulfield
2009-06-24 11:44     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
     [not found]       ` <1245843884.6695.54.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-24 12:09         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-24 12:09           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-24 12:09           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
     [not found]           ` <1245845367.24921.3.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-24 13:50             ` Chrissie Caulfield
2009-06-24 13:50               ` Chrissie Caulfield
2009-06-24 13:50               ` Chrissie Caulfield
     [not found]               ` <5A680E0A-EFEB-44EA-9F06-F338E6CBD6D1-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-25 11:52                 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-25 11:52                   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-25 11:52                   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
     [not found]                   ` <1245930729.24921.67.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-25 23:10                     ` David Miller
2009-06-25 23:10                       ` David Miller
2009-06-25 23:10                       ` David Miller
     [not found]                       ` <20090625.161046.19938291.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-26 19:18                         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-26 19:18                           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-26 19:18                           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-27  3:15                           ` Christian Kujau
2009-06-27  7:35                             ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 08/10] edac_core: Uses call_rcu() and its own wait_for_completion scheme Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 15:04   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 15:04   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 09/10] cfq-iosched: Uses its own open-coded rcu_barrier Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 15:04   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 15:04   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-24  6:42   ` Jens Axboe
2009-06-24  6:42     ` Jens Axboe
2009-06-24  6:42     ` Jens Axboe
     [not found]     ` <20090624064236.GE31415-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-24 14:05       ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-24 14:05         ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-24 14:05         ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 10/10] nf_conntrack: Use rcu_barrier() Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 15:04   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 15:04   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 16:23   ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-24  9:02     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-24  9:40       ` [PATCH v2 10/10] nf_conntrack: Use rcu_barrier() and fix kmem_cache_create flags Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-24 13:58         ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-25  9:29           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-25  9:29             ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-25 10:02             ` [PATCH v3 10/10] nf_conntrack: Use rcu_barrier() Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-25 10:02               ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-25 14:33               ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-25 14:33                 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-25 13:59             ` [PATCH v2 10/10] nf_conntrack: Use rcu_barrier() and fix kmem_cache_create flags Patrick McHardy
2009-06-25 13:59               ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-25 19:32             ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-25 19:32               ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-24  1:44 ` [PATCH 00/10] We must use rcu_barrier() on module unload Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-24  1:44   ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-24  1:44   ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-24  7:02 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1245837965.6695.45.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=hawk-4upunzonu4c@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust-HgOvQuBEEgTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=adilger-xsfywfwIY+M@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=bluesmoke-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=christine.caulfield-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dougthompson-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kaber-dcUjhNyLwpNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=neilb-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=shemminger-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=yoshfuji-VfPWfsRibaP+Ru+s062T9g@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.