From: hermann pitton <hermann-pitton@arcor.de>
To: Avl Jawrowski <avljawrowski@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problems with Pinnacle 310i (saa7134) and recent kernels
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 05:20:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1248146456.3239.6.camel@pc07.localdom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20090720T224156-477@post.gmane.org>
Hi,
Am Montag, den 20.07.2009, 23:30 +0000 schrieb Avl Jawrowski:
> Hi, thank you!
>
> hermann pitton <hermann-pitton <at> arcor.de> writes:
>
> > > tuner 1-004b: chip found @ 0x96 (saa7133[0])
> > > tda829x 1-004b: setting tuner address to 61
> > > tda829x 1-004b: type set to tda8290+75a
> >
> > Nothing about the IR, but at least all tuner modules seem to be
> > correctly loaded.
>
> Im not using the IR because for now I dont need it, but I will try it.
>
> > What was your last good working kernel and was your eeprom already
> > failing there too, or is that new?
>
> I don't remember the last working kernel.
> I tried to recompile 2.6.25 but I obtain this error:
>
> DVB: Unable to find symbol tda10046_attach()
> saa7133[0]/dvb: frontend initialization failed
>
> The eeprom was working a few months ago giving this messages:
>
> saa7133[0]: found at 0000:01:02.0, rev: 209, irq: 19, latency: 64, mmio: 0xcfddf
> 800
> saa7133[0]: subsystem: ffff:ffff, board: UNKNOWN/GENERIC [card=0,autodetected]
> saa7133[0]: board init: gpio is 600e000
> saa7133[0]: i2c eeprom 00: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> saa7133[0]: i2c eeprom 10: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> saa7133[0]: i2c eeprom 20: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> saa7133[0]: i2c eeprom 30: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> saa7133[0]: i2c eeprom 40: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> saa7133[0]: i2c eeprom 50: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> saa7133[0]: i2c eeprom 60: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> saa7133[0]: i2c eeprom 70: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> saa7133[0]: registered device video0 [v4l2]
> saa7133[0]: registered device vbi0
>
> Even then the card was not recognised.
>
> > Usually such is caused by bad contacts of the PCI slot or by a bad PSU,
> > but we have reports from a Pinnacle 50i with the same i2c remote.
> >
> > It has i2c troubles (ARB_LOST) and then also problems on loading the
> > tuner modules correctly. With disable_ir=1 for saa7134 it became at
> > least somewhat usable again.
> >
> > But for the 310i is another problem reported starting with kernel
> > 2.6.26.
> >
> > The 310i and the HVR1110 are the only cards with LowNoiseAmplifier
> > config = 1. Before 2.6.26 two buffers were sent to the tuner at 0x61,
> > doing some undocumented LNA configuration, since 2.6.26 they go to the
> > analog IF demodulator tda8290 at 0x4b.
> >
> > This was bisected here on the list and is wrong for the 300i.
> > Thread is "2.6.26 regression ..."
> >
> > The HVR1110 using the same new configuration seems to come in variants
> > with and without LNA and nobody knows, how to make a difference for
> > those cards. At least still no reports about troubles with the new LNA
> > configuration there.
> >
> > The attached patch against recent mercurial master v4l-dvb at
> > linuxtv.org tries to restore the pre 2.6.26 behaviour for DVB-T on the
> > 300i.
> >
> > It changes also the i2c remote address of the Upmost Purple TV from 0x7a
> > to 0x3d, since recent i2c on >= 2.6.30 complains about it as invalid
> > 7-bit address, just in case.
> >
> > Good luck,
> >
> > Hermann
> >
> >
> > Attachment (saa7134-try_to_improve_the_310i.patch): text/x-patch, 1925 bytes
>
> I tried the patch with 2.6.30.2 on v4l-dvb-1cb6f19d2c9d, but I get only some
> errors (I have rebooted):
>
> videodev: exports duplicate symbol video_unregister_device (owned by kernel)
> v4l2_common: exports duplicate symbol v4l2_chip_ident_i2c_client (owned by kerne
> l)
> saa7134: Unknown symbol v4l_bound_align_image
>
> I get these errors even not applying the patch.
>
there is no excuse for getting errors on linux ;)
Where you got this card from and did it ever work on the same machine
with m$ stuff?
Clean up your module mess, read again, and if the eeprom has still
nothing to tell than 1 for all, get rid of it.
Cheers,
Hermann
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-21 3:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-18 14:05 Problems with Pinnacle 310i (saa7134) and recent kernels Avl Jawrowski
2009-07-19 19:59 ` hermann pitton
2009-07-20 23:30 ` Avl Jawrowski
2009-07-21 3:20 ` hermann pitton [this message]
2009-07-22 12:41 ` Avl Jawrowski
2009-07-23 8:40 ` hermann pitton
2009-09-10 21:51 ` Avl Jawrowski
2009-09-11 1:00 ` hermann pitton
2009-09-12 21:39 ` Avl Jawrowski
2009-09-13 4:12 ` hermann pitton
2009-09-13 12:02 ` Avl Jawrowski
2009-09-13 22:42 ` hermann pitton
2009-09-14 6:24 ` Hans Verkuil
2009-09-14 23:50 ` saa7134 - radio broken for v4l1 apps - was - " hermann pitton
2009-09-15 16:39 ` Hans Verkuil
2009-09-15 22:29 ` hermann pitton
2009-09-14 13:32 ` Avl Jawrowski
2009-09-14 22:53 ` hermann pitton
2009-09-15 20:27 ` Avl Jawrowski
2009-09-16 22:07 ` hermann pitton
2010-02-20 11:49 ` Avl Jawrowski
2010-03-01 5:21 ` hermann pitton
2010-06-26 12:08 ` Avl Jawrowski
2010-06-26 21:48 ` hermann pitton
2010-06-29 11:22 ` Avl Jawrowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1248146456.3239.6.camel@pc07.localdom.local \
--to=hermann-pitton@arcor.de \
--cc=avljawrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.