All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Cc: linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/16] pcmcia: use dynamic debug infrastructure, deprecate CS_CHECK (misc drivers)
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:05:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1256544329.29885.398.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091026075617.GA793@isilmar.linta.de>

On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 08:56 +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 09:26:31AM +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > No, I don't have all that much PCMCIA hardware -- and specifically none for
> > > the drivers which were modified in this patch (parport, ixj-telephony,
> > > sl811; pcmcia_mtd is marked broken anyway).
> > 
> > This driver is old and ugly, and it is even possible that no one uses it
> > anymore, so I guess getting clean-ups without testing is ok for it.
> 
> Which one are you referring to specifically?

Actually I referred to pcmciamtd. I was confused a little, sorry.

> > However, in that case the clean-up patches should be reviewable, which I
> > wouldn't say about your patch :-)
> 
> It are "only" 46 line changes max per driver?
> 
> > Could you please split it on several smaller patches, each doing one
> > thing only?
> 
> Well, I could split up the -- related -- CS_CHECK() and dev_dbg() parts if
> _really_ necessary.

I cannot comment about "_really_", this is just what I personally think
would be a good idea, up to you.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-26  8:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-24 19:42 [RFC] more PCMCIA cleanup patches for 2.6.33 Dominik Brodowski
2009-10-24 19:42 ` [PATCH 04/16] pcmcia: use dynamic debug infrastructure, deprecate CS_CHECK (ide) Dominik Brodowski
2009-10-26 15:47   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-10-26 15:33     ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-10-24 19:42 ` [PATCH 08/16] pcmcia: use dynamic debug infrastructure, deprecate CS_CHECK (net) Dominik Brodowski
2009-10-24 19:42 ` [PATCH 09/16] pcmcia: use dynamic debug infrastructure, deprecate CS_CHECK (ray-cs.c) Dominik Brodowski
2009-10-24 19:42   ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-10-24 19:43 ` [PATCH 10/16] pcmcia: use dynamic debug infrastructure, deprecate CS_CHECK (wireless) Dominik Brodowski
2009-10-24 19:43   ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-10-24 19:43 ` [PATCH 11/16] pcmcia: use dynamic debug infrastructure, deprecate CS_CHECK (scsi) Dominik Brodowski
2009-10-24 20:16   ` Rolf Eike Beer
2009-10-24 20:39     ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-10-24 19:43 ` [PATCH 12/16] pcmcia: use dynamic debug infrastructure, deprecate CS_CHECK (serial_cs) Dominik Brodowski
2009-10-24 19:43 ` [PATCH 13/16] pcmcia: use dynamic debug infrastructure, deprecate CS_CHECK (sound) Dominik Brodowski
2009-11-02 10:43   ` Takashi Iwai
2009-10-24 19:43 ` [PATCH 14/16] pcmcia: use dynamic debug infrastructure, deprecate CS_CHECK (misc drivers) Dominik Brodowski
2009-10-26  6:42   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-10-26  7:13     ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-10-26  7:26       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-10-26  7:56         ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-10-26  8:05           ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2009-10-26 10:19         ` Alan Cox
2009-10-26 10:18           ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-11-03  8:37             ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-11-07 11:19               ` pcmciamtd -- what's broken, who needs it? Dominik Brodowski
2009-11-07 11:29                 ` Komuro
2009-11-07 11:33                   ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-11-07 16:57                     ` Kristoffer Ericson
2009-11-08  8:12                       ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-11-07 22:33                 ` Komuro
2009-11-04 10:20             ` PETEC 2MB SRAM Pep Talens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1256544329.29885.398.camel@localhost \
    --to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.