From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, awalls@radix.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org, mingo@elte.hu,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au, cl@linux-foundation.org,
dhowells@redhat.com, arjan@linux.intel.com, avi@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net,
andi@firstfloor.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 12/27] workqueue: separate out process_one_work()
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:57:53 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1261141088-2014-13-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1261141088-2014-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Separate out process_one_work() out of run_workqueue(). This patch
doesn't cause any behavior change.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index f8e4d67..aa1d680 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -395,51 +395,73 @@ int queue_delayed_work_on(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(queue_delayed_work_on);
+/**
+ * process_one_work - process single work
+ * @cwq: cwq to process work for
+ * @work: work to process
+ *
+ * Process @work. This function contains all the logics necessary to
+ * process a single work including synchronization against and
+ * interaction with other workers on the same cpu, queueing and
+ * flushing. As long as context requirement is met, any worker can
+ * call this function to process a work.
+ *
+ * CONTEXT:
+ * spin_lock_irq(cwq->lock) which is released and regrabbed.
+ */
+static void process_one_work(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq,
+ struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ work_func_t f = work->func;
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
+ /*
+ * It is permissible to free the struct work_struct from
+ * inside the function that is called from it, this we need to
+ * take into account for lockdep too. To avoid bogus "held
+ * lock freed" warnings as well as problems when looking into
+ * work->lockdep_map, make a copy and use that here.
+ */
+ struct lockdep_map lockdep_map = work->lockdep_map;
+#endif
+ /* claim and process */
+ trace_workqueue_execution(cwq->thread, work);
+ debug_work_deactivate(work);
+ cwq->current_work = work;
+ list_del_init(&work->entry);
+
+ spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock);
+
+ BUG_ON(get_wq_data(work) != cwq);
+ work_clear_pending(work);
+ lock_map_acquire(&cwq->wq->lockdep_map);
+ lock_map_acquire(&lockdep_map);
+ f(work);
+ lock_map_release(&lockdep_map);
+ lock_map_release(&cwq->wq->lockdep_map);
+
+ if (unlikely(in_atomic() || lockdep_depth(current) > 0)) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "BUG: workqueue leaked lock or atomic: "
+ "%s/0x%08x/%d\n",
+ current->comm, preempt_count(), task_pid_nr(current));
+ printk(KERN_ERR " last function: ");
+ print_symbol("%s\n", (unsigned long)f);
+ debug_show_held_locks(current);
+ dump_stack();
+ }
+
+ spin_lock_irq(&cwq->lock);
+
+ /* we're done with it, release */
+ cwq->current_work = NULL;
+}
+
static void run_workqueue(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq)
{
spin_lock_irq(&cwq->lock);
while (!list_empty(&cwq->worklist)) {
struct work_struct *work = list_entry(cwq->worklist.next,
struct work_struct, entry);
- work_func_t f = work->func;
-#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
- /*
- * It is permissible to free the struct work_struct
- * from inside the function that is called from it,
- * this we need to take into account for lockdep too.
- * To avoid bogus "held lock freed" warnings as well
- * as problems when looking into work->lockdep_map,
- * make a copy and use that here.
- */
- struct lockdep_map lockdep_map = work->lockdep_map;
-#endif
- trace_workqueue_execution(cwq->thread, work);
- debug_work_deactivate(work);
- cwq->current_work = work;
- list_del_init(cwq->worklist.next);
- spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock);
-
- BUG_ON(get_wq_data(work) != cwq);
- work_clear_pending(work);
- lock_map_acquire(&cwq->wq->lockdep_map);
- lock_map_acquire(&lockdep_map);
- f(work);
- lock_map_release(&lockdep_map);
- lock_map_release(&cwq->wq->lockdep_map);
-
- if (unlikely(in_atomic() || lockdep_depth(current) > 0)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "BUG: workqueue leaked lock or atomic: "
- "%s/0x%08x/%d\n",
- current->comm, preempt_count(),
- task_pid_nr(current));
- printk(KERN_ERR " last function: ");
- print_symbol("%s\n", (unsigned long)f);
- debug_show_held_locks(current);
- dump_stack();
- }
-
- spin_lock_irq(&cwq->lock);
- cwq->current_work = NULL;
+ process_one_work(cwq, work);
}
spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock);
}
--
1.6.4.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-18 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-18 12:57 Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 01/27] sched: rename preempt_notifiers to sched_notifiers and refactor implementation Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 02/27] sched: refactor try_to_wake_up() Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 03/27] sched: implement __set_cpus_allowed() Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 04/27] sched: make sched_notifiers unconditional Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 05/27] sched: add wakeup/sleep sched_notifiers and allow NULL notifier ops Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 06/27] sched: implement try_to_wake_up_local() Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 07/27] acpi: use queue_work_on() instead of binding workqueue worker to cpu0 Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 08/27] stop_machine: reimplement without using workqueue Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 09/27] workqueue: misc/cosmetic updates Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 10/27] workqueue: merge feature parameters into flags Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 11/27] workqueue: define both bit position and mask for work flags Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 13/27] workqueue: temporarily disable workqueue tracing Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 14/27] workqueue: kill cpu_populated_map Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 15/27] workqueue: update cwq alignement Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 16/27] workqueue: reimplement workqueue flushing using color coded works Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 17/27] workqueue: introduce worker Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 18/27] workqueue: reimplement work flushing using linked works Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:58 ` [PATCH 19/27] workqueue: implement per-cwq active work limit Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:58 ` [PATCH 20/27] workqueue: reimplement workqueue freeze using max_active Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:58 ` [PATCH 21/27] workqueue: introduce global cwq and unify cwq locks Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:58 ` [PATCH 22/27] workqueue: implement worker states Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:58 ` [PATCH 23/27] workqueue: reimplement CPU hotplugging support using trustee Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:58 ` [PATCH 24/27] workqueue: make single thread workqueue shared worker pool friendly Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:58 ` [PATCH 25/27] workqueue: use shared worklist and pool all workers per cpu Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:58 ` [PATCH 26/27] workqueue: implement concurrency managed dynamic worker pool Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:58 ` [PATCH 27/27] workqueue: increase max_active of keventd and kill current_is_keventd() Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 13:00 ` SUBJ: [RFC PATCHSET] concurrency managed workqueue, take#2 Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 13:03 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 13:45 ` workqueue thing Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-18 13:50 ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-18 15:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-21 3:19 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-21 9:17 ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-21 10:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-21 11:09 ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-21 11:17 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-21 11:33 ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-21 13:18 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-21 11:11 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-21 13:22 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-21 13:53 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-21 14:19 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-21 15:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-22 0:00 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-22 11:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-22 17:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-22 17:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-22 18:07 ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-22 18:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-23 8:17 ` Stijn Devriendt
2009-12-23 8:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-23 9:01 ` Stijn Devriendt
2009-12-22 18:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-23 8:06 ` Johannes Berg
2009-12-23 3:37 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-23 6:52 ` Herbert Xu
2009-12-23 8:00 ` Steffen Klassert
2009-12-23 8:01 ` [PATCH 0/2] Parallel crypto/IPsec v7 Steffen Klassert
2009-12-23 8:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] padata: generic parallelization/serialization interface Steffen Klassert
2009-12-23 8:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] crypto: pcrypt - Add pcrypt crypto parallelization wrapper Steffen Klassert
2010-01-07 5:39 ` [PATCH 0/2] Parallel crypto/IPsec v7 Herbert Xu
2010-01-16 9:44 ` David Miller
2009-12-18 15:30 ` workqueue thing Linus Torvalds
2009-12-18 15:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-18 15:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-18 15:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-18 15:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-21 3:04 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-21 9:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-21 13:30 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-21 14:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-21 23:50 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-22 11:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-22 11:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-23 3:43 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-22 11:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-23 3:48 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-22 11:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-23 4:18 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-23 4:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-23 6:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-23 6:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-12-23 7:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-23 8:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-23 10:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-12-23 13:33 ` Stefan Richter
2009-12-23 14:20 ` Mark Brown
2009-12-23 7:09 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-23 8:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-23 8:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-23 8:32 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-23 8:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-23 8:27 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-23 8:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-23 8:49 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-23 8:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-23 9:03 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-23 13:40 ` Stefan Richter
2009-12-23 13:43 ` Stefan Richter
2009-12-23 8:25 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-23 13:00 ` Stefan Richter
2009-12-23 8:31 ` Stijn Devriendt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1261141088-2014-13-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=awalls@radix.net \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.