All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, awalls@radix.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au, cl@linux-foundation.org,
	dhowells@redhat.com, arjan@linux.intel.com, avi@redhat.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net,
	andi@firstfloor.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 18/27] workqueue: reimplement work flushing using linked works
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:57:59 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1261141088-2014-19-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1261141088-2014-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

A work is linked to the next one by having WORK_STRUCT_LINKED bit set
and these links can be chained.  When a linked work is dispatched to a
worker, all linked works are dispatched to the worker's newly added
->scheduled queue and processed back-to-back.

Currently, as there's only single worker per cwq, having linked works
doesn't make any visible behavior difference.  This change is to
prepare for multiple shared workers per cpu.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/workqueue.h |    2 +
 kernel/workqueue.c        |  152 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h
index 316cc48..a6650f1 100644
--- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
+++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
@@ -25,9 +25,11 @@ typedef void (*work_func_t)(struct work_struct *work);
 enum {
 	WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT	= 0,	/* work item is pending execution */
 	WORK_STRUCT_STATIC_BIT	= 1,	/* static initializer (debugobjects) */
+	WORK_STRUCT_LINKED_BIT	= 2,	/* next work is linked to this one */
 
 	WORK_STRUCT_PENDING	= 1 << WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT,
 	WORK_STRUCT_STATIC	= 1 << WORK_STRUCT_STATIC_BIT,
+	WORK_STRUCT_LINKED	= 1 << WORK_STRUCT_LINKED_BIT,
 
 	WORK_STRUCT_COLOR_SHIFT	= 3,	/* color for workqueue flushing */
 	WORK_STRUCT_COLOR_BITS	= 4,
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 17d270b..2ac1624 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ struct cpu_workqueue_struct;
 
 struct worker {
 	struct work_struct	*current_work;	/* L: work being processed */
+	struct list_head	scheduled;	/* L: scheduled works */
 	struct task_struct	*task;		/* I: worker task */
 	struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq;	/* I: the associated cwq */
 	int			id;		/* I: worker id */
@@ -438,6 +439,8 @@ static struct worker *alloc_worker(void)
 	struct worker *worker;
 
 	worker = kzalloc(sizeof(*worker), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (worker)
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worker->scheduled);
 	return worker;
 }
 
@@ -523,6 +526,7 @@ static void destroy_worker(struct worker *worker)
 
 	/* sanity check frenzy */
 	BUG_ON(worker->current_work);
+	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&worker->scheduled));
 
 	kthread_stop(worker->task);
 	kfree(worker);
@@ -533,6 +537,48 @@ static void destroy_worker(struct worker *worker)
 }
 
 /**
+ * move_linked_works - move linked works to a list
+ * @work: start of series of works to be scheduled
+ * @head: target list to append @work to
+ * @nextp: out paramter for nested worklist walking
+ *
+ * Schedule linked works starting from @work to @head.  Work series to
+ * be scheduled starts at @work and includes any consecutive work with
+ * WORK_STRUCT_LINKED set in its predecessor.
+ *
+ * If @nextp is not NULL, it's updated to point to the next work of
+ * the last scheduled work.  This allows move_linked_works() to be
+ * nested inside outer list_for_each_entry_safe().
+ *
+ * CONTEXT:
+ * spin_lock_irq(cwq->lock).
+ */
+static void move_linked_works(struct work_struct *work, struct list_head *head,
+			      struct work_struct **nextp)
+{
+	struct work_struct *n;
+
+	/*
+	 * Linked worklist will always end before the end of the list,
+	 * use NULL for list head.
+	 */
+	work = list_entry(work->entry.prev, struct work_struct, entry);
+	list_for_each_entry_safe_continue(work, n, NULL, entry) {
+		list_move_tail(&work->entry, head);
+		if (!(*work_data_bits(work) & WORK_STRUCT_LINKED))
+			break;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * If we're already inside safe list traversal and have moved
+	 * multiple works to the scheduled queue, the next position
+	 * needs to be updated.
+	 */
+	if (nextp)
+		*nextp = n;
+}
+
+/**
  * cwq_dec_nr_in_flight - decrement cwq's nr_in_flight
  * @cwq: cwq of interest
  * @color: color of work which left the queue
@@ -632,17 +678,25 @@ static void process_one_work(struct worker *worker, struct work_struct *work)
 	cwq_dec_nr_in_flight(cwq, work_color);
 }
 
-static void run_workqueue(struct worker *worker)
+/**
+ * process_scheduled_works - process scheduled works
+ * @worker: self
+ *
+ * Process all scheduled works.  Please note that the scheduled list
+ * may change while processing a work, so this function repeatedly
+ * fetches a work from the top and executes it.
+ *
+ * CONTEXT:
+ * spin_lock_irq(cwq->lock) which may be released and regrabbed
+ * multiple times.
+ */
+static void process_scheduled_works(struct worker *worker)
 {
-	struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = worker->cwq;
-
-	spin_lock_irq(&cwq->lock);
-	while (!list_empty(&cwq->worklist)) {
-		struct work_struct *work = list_entry(cwq->worklist.next,
+	while (!list_empty(&worker->scheduled)) {
+		struct work_struct *work = list_first_entry(&worker->scheduled,
 						struct work_struct, entry);
 		process_one_work(worker, work);
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -673,7 +727,27 @@ static int worker_thread(void *__worker)
 		if (kthread_should_stop())
 			break;
 
-		run_workqueue(worker);
+		spin_lock_irq(&cwq->lock);
+
+		while (!list_empty(&cwq->worklist)) {
+			struct work_struct *work =
+				list_first_entry(&cwq->worklist,
+						 struct work_struct, entry);
+
+			if (likely(!(*work_data_bits(work) &
+				     WORK_STRUCT_LINKED))) {
+				/* optimization path, not strictly necessary */
+				process_one_work(worker, work);
+				if (unlikely(!list_empty(&worker->scheduled)))
+					process_scheduled_works(worker);
+			} else {
+				move_linked_works(work, &worker->scheduled,
+						  NULL);
+				process_scheduled_works(worker);
+			}
+		}
+
+		spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -694,16 +768,33 @@ static void wq_barrier_func(struct work_struct *work)
  * insert_wq_barrier - insert a barrier work
  * @cwq: cwq to insert barrier into
  * @barr: wq_barrier to insert
- * @head: insertion point
+ * @target: target work to attach @barr to
+ * @worker: worker currently executing @target, NULL if @target is not executing
  *
- * Insert barrier @barr into @cwq before @head.
+ * @barr is linked to @target such that @barr is completed only after
+ * @target finishes execution.  Please note that the ordering
+ * guarantee is observed only with respect to @target and on the local
+ * cpu.
+ *
+ * Currently, a queued barrier can't be canceled.  This is because
+ * try_to_grab_pending() can't determine whether the work to be
+ * grabbed is at the head of the queue and thus can't clear LINKED
+ * flag of the previous work while there must be a valid next work
+ * after a work with LINKED flag set.
+ *
+ * Note that when @worker is non-NULL, @target may be modified
+ * underneath us, so we can't reliably determine cwq from @target.
  *
  * CONTEXT:
  * spin_lock_irq(cwq->lock).
  */
 static void insert_wq_barrier(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq,
-			struct wq_barrier *barr, struct list_head *head)
+			      struct wq_barrier *barr,
+			      struct work_struct *target, struct worker *worker)
 {
+	struct list_head *head;
+	unsigned int linked = 0;
+
 	/*
 	 * debugobject calls are safe here even with cwq->lock locked
 	 * as we know for sure that this will not trigger any of the
@@ -714,8 +805,24 @@ static void insert_wq_barrier(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq,
 	__set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, work_data_bits(&barr->work));
 	init_completion(&barr->done);
 
+	/*
+	 * If @target is currently being executed, schedule the
+	 * barrier to the worker; otherwise, put it after @target.
+	 */
+	if (worker)
+		head = worker->scheduled.next;
+	else {
+		unsigned long *bits = work_data_bits(target);
+
+		head = target->entry.next;
+		/* there can already be other linked works, inherit and set */
+		linked = *bits & WORK_STRUCT_LINKED;
+		*bits |= WORK_STRUCT_LINKED;
+	}
+
 	debug_work_activate(&barr->work);
-	insert_work(cwq, &barr->work, head, work_color_to_flags(WORK_NO_COLOR));
+	insert_work(cwq, &barr->work, head,
+		    work_color_to_flags(WORK_NO_COLOR) | linked);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -948,8 +1055,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(flush_workqueue);
  */
 int flush_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
+	struct worker *worker = NULL;
 	struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq;
-	struct list_head *prev;
 	struct wq_barrier barr;
 
 	might_sleep();
@@ -969,14 +1076,14 @@ int flush_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		smp_rmb();
 		if (unlikely(cwq != get_wq_data(work)))
 			goto already_gone;
-		prev = &work->entry;
 	} else {
-		if (!cwq->worker || cwq->worker->current_work != work)
+		if (cwq->worker && cwq->worker->current_work == work)
+			worker = cwq->worker;
+		if (!worker)
 			goto already_gone;
-		prev = &cwq->worklist;
 	}
-	insert_wq_barrier(cwq, &barr, prev->next);
 
+	insert_wq_barrier(cwq, &barr, work, worker);
 	spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock);
 	wait_for_completion(&barr.done);
 	destroy_work_on_stack(&barr.work);
@@ -1033,16 +1140,19 @@ static void wait_on_cpu_work(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq,
 				struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct wq_barrier barr;
-	int running = 0;
+	struct worker *worker;
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&cwq->lock);
+
+	worker = NULL;
 	if (unlikely(cwq->worker && cwq->worker->current_work == work)) {
-		insert_wq_barrier(cwq, &barr, cwq->worklist.next);
-		running = 1;
+		worker = cwq->worker;
+		insert_wq_barrier(cwq, &barr, work, worker);
 	}
+
 	spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock);
 
-	if (unlikely(running)) {
+	if (unlikely(worker)) {
 		wait_for_completion(&barr.done);
 		destroy_work_on_stack(&barr.work);
 	}
-- 
1.6.4.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-12-18 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-18 12:57 Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 01/27] sched: rename preempt_notifiers to sched_notifiers and refactor implementation Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 02/27] sched: refactor try_to_wake_up() Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 03/27] sched: implement __set_cpus_allowed() Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 04/27] sched: make sched_notifiers unconditional Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 05/27] sched: add wakeup/sleep sched_notifiers and allow NULL notifier ops Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 06/27] sched: implement try_to_wake_up_local() Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 07/27] acpi: use queue_work_on() instead of binding workqueue worker to cpu0 Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 08/27] stop_machine: reimplement without using workqueue Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 09/27] workqueue: misc/cosmetic updates Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 10/27] workqueue: merge feature parameters into flags Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 11/27] workqueue: define both bit position and mask for work flags Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 12/27] workqueue: separate out process_one_work() Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 13/27] workqueue: temporarily disable workqueue tracing Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 14/27] workqueue: kill cpu_populated_map Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 15/27] workqueue: update cwq alignement Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 16/27] workqueue: reimplement workqueue flushing using color coded works Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` [PATCH 17/27] workqueue: introduce worker Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:57 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-12-18 12:58 ` [PATCH 19/27] workqueue: implement per-cwq active work limit Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:58 ` [PATCH 20/27] workqueue: reimplement workqueue freeze using max_active Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:58 ` [PATCH 21/27] workqueue: introduce global cwq and unify cwq locks Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:58 ` [PATCH 22/27] workqueue: implement worker states Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:58 ` [PATCH 23/27] workqueue: reimplement CPU hotplugging support using trustee Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:58 ` [PATCH 24/27] workqueue: make single thread workqueue shared worker pool friendly Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:58 ` [PATCH 25/27] workqueue: use shared worklist and pool all workers per cpu Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:58 ` [PATCH 26/27] workqueue: implement concurrency managed dynamic worker pool Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 12:58 ` [PATCH 27/27] workqueue: increase max_active of keventd and kill current_is_keventd() Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 13:00 ` SUBJ: [RFC PATCHSET] concurrency managed workqueue, take#2 Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 13:03 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 13:45 ` workqueue thing Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-18 13:50   ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-18 15:01     ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-21  3:19       ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-21  9:17       ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-21 10:35         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-21 11:09         ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-21 11:17           ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-21 11:33             ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-21 13:18             ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-21 11:11         ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-21 13:22           ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-21 13:53             ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-21 14:19               ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-21 15:19                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-22  0:00                   ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-22 11:10                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-22 17:20                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-22 17:47                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-22 18:07                           ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-22 18:20                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-23  8:17                             ` Stijn Devriendt
2009-12-23  8:43                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-23  9:01                                 ` Stijn Devriendt
2009-12-22 18:28                           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-23  8:06                             ` Johannes Berg
2009-12-23  3:37                           ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-23  6:52                             ` Herbert Xu
2009-12-23  8:00                               ` Steffen Klassert
2009-12-23  8:01                                 ` [PATCH 0/2] Parallel crypto/IPsec v7 Steffen Klassert
2009-12-23  8:03                                   ` [PATCH 1/2] padata: generic parallelization/serialization interface Steffen Klassert
2009-12-23  8:04                                   ` [PATCH 2/2] crypto: pcrypt - Add pcrypt crypto parallelization wrapper Steffen Klassert
2010-01-07  5:39                                   ` [PATCH 0/2] Parallel crypto/IPsec v7 Herbert Xu
2010-01-16  9:44                                     ` David Miller
2009-12-18 15:30   ` workqueue thing Linus Torvalds
2009-12-18 15:39     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-18 15:39     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-18 15:47       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-18 15:53         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-21  3:04   ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-21  9:22     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-21 13:30       ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-21 14:26         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-21 23:50           ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-22 11:00             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-22 11:03             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-23  3:43               ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-22 11:04             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-23  3:48               ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-22 11:06             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-23  4:18               ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-23  4:42                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-23  6:02                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-23  6:13                     ` Jeff Garzik
2009-12-23  7:53                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-23  8:41                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-23 10:25                         ` Jeff Garzik
2009-12-23 13:33                           ` Stefan Richter
2009-12-23 14:20                           ` Mark Brown
2009-12-23  7:09                     ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-23  8:01                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-23  8:12                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-23  8:32                           ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-23  8:42                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-23  8:27                         ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-23  8:37                           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-23  8:49                             ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-23  8:49                               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-23  9:03                                 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-23 13:40                             ` Stefan Richter
2009-12-23 13:43                               ` Stefan Richter
2009-12-23  8:25                       ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-23 13:00                     ` Stefan Richter
2009-12-23  8:31             ` Stijn Devriendt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1261141088-2014-19-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=awalls@radix.net \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.