Re: [oe-commits] Joshua Lock : packaged-staging: enhancements from Poky for fetching and relocatability

[Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>]

On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 08:25 -0700, Chris Larson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 15:35 +0100, Joshua Lock wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 15:21 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 13:44 +0000, git version control wrote:
> > > > > Module: openembedded.git
> > > > > Branch: rpurdie/work-in-progress
> > > > > Commit: ccbb586b3cfdc723ccad73dd71d85f6d41f0e6a3
> > > > > URL:
> > http://gitweb.openembedded.net/?p=openembedded.git&a=commit;h=ccbb586b3cfdc723ccad73dd71d85f6d41f0e6a3
> > > > >
> > > > > Author: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
> > > > > Date:   Wed Mar 31 11:22:02 2010 +0100
> > > > >
> > > > > packaged-staging: enhancements from Poky for fetching and
> > relocatability
> > > >
> > > > Question.  Do we really want to rename DEPLOY_DIR_PSTAGE to PSTAGE_DIR.
> > > > Is that really a nomenclature change like that?  I see it's still soft
> > > > assign so outsideof TMPDIR can work still, so it's fine otherwise.
> >  Just
> > > > checking.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I changed the name because we now have two pstage directories and wanted
> > > the change to be apparent and I dropped the DEPLOY_ prefix as I moved
> > > the default location outside of the deploy dir.
> > >
> > > Does that seem reasonable?
> >
> > I think so, but I must be missing something.  Are you talking about the
> > dir where we assemble packages as the 2nd one?  Or something else?
> > Haven't made my coffee yet today...
> 
> 
> I haven't looked at the patches in a while, but from what I recall, he
> splits the dir where the pstage .ipk files go from the rest of the files
> that cluttered up DEPLOY_DIR_PSTAGE.  I could be remembering incorrectly, of
> course (do that a *lot* :).

My memory is recalling the same thing ;-)

Cheers,
Joshua
-- 
Joshua Lock
        Intel Open Source Technology Centre