From: Jeff Ohlstein <johlstei@codeaurora.org>
To: linux@arm.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@codeaurora.org>,
Jeff Ohlstein <johlstei@codeaurora.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] GIC: Dont disable INT in ack callback
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:57:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1279839450-6477-1-git-send-email-johlstei@codeaurora.org> (raw)
From: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@codeaurora.org>
Unless gic_ack_irq is called from __do_IRQ, interrupt should not
be disabled in the ack function. Disabling the interrupt causes
handle_edge_irq to never enable it again.
Signed-off-by: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Ohlstein <johlstei@codeaurora.org>
---
arch/arm/common/gic.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/common/gic.c b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
index 337741f..1ac2f31 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/gic.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
@@ -67,25 +67,30 @@ static inline unsigned int gic_irq(unsigned int irq)
/*
* Routines to acknowledge, disable and enable interrupts
- *
- * Linux assumes that when we're done with an interrupt we need to
- * unmask it, in the same way we need to unmask an interrupt when
- * we first enable it.
- *
- * The GIC has a separate notion of "end of interrupt" to re-enable
- * an interrupt after handling, in order to support hardware
- * prioritisation.
- *
- * We can make the GIC behave in the way that Linux expects by making
- * our "acknowledge" routine disable the interrupt, then mark it as
- * complete.
*/
static void gic_ack_irq(unsigned int irq)
{
- u32 mask = 1 << (irq % 32);
spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
+
+#ifndef CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ
+ u32 mask = 1 << (irq % 32);
+
+ /*
+ * Linux assumes that when we're done with an interrupt we need to
+ * unmask it, in the same way we need to unmask an interrupt when
+ * we first enable it.
+ *
+ * The GIC has a separate notion of "end of interrupt" to re-enable
+ * an interrupt after handling, in order to support hardware
+ * prioritisation.
+ *
+ * We can make the GIC behave in the way that Linux expects by making
+ * our "acknowledge" routine disable the interrupt, then mark it as
+ * complete.
+ */
writel(mask, gic_dist_base(irq) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + (gic_irq(irq) / 32) * 4);
+#endif
writel(gic_irq(irq), gic_cpu_base(irq) + GIC_CPU_EOI);
spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
}
--
1.7.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: johlstei@codeaurora.org (Jeff Ohlstein)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] GIC: Dont disable INT in ack callback
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:57:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1279839450-6477-1-git-send-email-johlstei@codeaurora.org> (raw)
From: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@codeaurora.org>
Unless gic_ack_irq is called from __do_IRQ, interrupt should not
be disabled in the ack function. Disabling the interrupt causes
handle_edge_irq to never enable it again.
Signed-off-by: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Ohlstein <johlstei@codeaurora.org>
---
arch/arm/common/gic.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/common/gic.c b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
index 337741f..1ac2f31 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/gic.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
@@ -67,25 +67,30 @@ static inline unsigned int gic_irq(unsigned int irq)
/*
* Routines to acknowledge, disable and enable interrupts
- *
- * Linux assumes that when we're done with an interrupt we need to
- * unmask it, in the same way we need to unmask an interrupt when
- * we first enable it.
- *
- * The GIC has a separate notion of "end of interrupt" to re-enable
- * an interrupt after handling, in order to support hardware
- * prioritisation.
- *
- * We can make the GIC behave in the way that Linux expects by making
- * our "acknowledge" routine disable the interrupt, then mark it as
- * complete.
*/
static void gic_ack_irq(unsigned int irq)
{
- u32 mask = 1 << (irq % 32);
spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
+
+#ifndef CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ
+ u32 mask = 1 << (irq % 32);
+
+ /*
+ * Linux assumes that when we're done with an interrupt we need to
+ * unmask it, in the same way we need to unmask an interrupt when
+ * we first enable it.
+ *
+ * The GIC has a separate notion of "end of interrupt" to re-enable
+ * an interrupt after handling, in order to support hardware
+ * prioritisation.
+ *
+ * We can make the GIC behave in the way that Linux expects by making
+ * our "acknowledge" routine disable the interrupt, then mark it as
+ * complete.
+ */
writel(mask, gic_dist_base(irq) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + (gic_irq(irq) / 32) * 4);
+#endif
writel(gic_irq(irq), gic_cpu_base(irq) + GIC_CPU_EOI);
spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
}
--
1.7.1
next reply other threads:[~2010-07-22 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-22 22:57 Jeff Ohlstein [this message]
2010-07-22 22:57 ` [PATCH] GIC: Dont disable INT in ack callback Jeff Ohlstein
2010-07-24 10:30 ` Rabin Vincent
2010-07-24 10:30 ` Rabin Vincent
2010-07-27 18:46 ` [PATCH v2] " Jeff Ohlstein
2010-07-27 18:46 ` Jeff Ohlstein
2010-07-27 18:46 ` Jeff Ohlstein
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-30 19:58 [PATCH] " Daniel Walker
2010-09-30 19:58 ` Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1279839450-6477-1-git-send-email-johlstei@codeaurora.org \
--to=johlstei@codeaurora.org \
--cc=adharmap@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.