From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH w-t] iwlwifi: rewrite iwl-scan.c to avoid race conditions
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:41:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1283344912.4124.2.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100901115826.GB6547@redhat.com>
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 13:58 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> Custom workqueue is not strictly needed, but it assure all works will
> run short after schedule. Common workqueue can not give us such guarantees,
> as other driver/subsystem can schedule own work, possibly slow, which
> can block start of our work for long time.
I believe that's no longer true, with Tejun's workqueue rewrite that
just got into mainline.
> > Shouldn't that only be a few of them anyway?
>
> For sure abort_scan and abort_timeout works have to be scheduled on something
> other than priv->workqueue. I'm queuing all scan works on priv->scan_workqueue
> for consistency.
Remind me: The reason is that we need to cancel them from within the
workqueue? But if we're on the same workqueue, it seems like they
couldn't be running already, so cancel_work_sync() would always cancel
them? Do we get lockdep errors for that? Or are there actual locks
involved?
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-01 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-31 15:00 [PATCH w-t] iwlwifi: rewrite iwl-scan.c to avoid race conditions Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-01 10:59 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-01 11:58 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-01 12:41 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2010-09-01 14:16 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-01 14:26 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-01 15:24 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-01 16:04 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-02 8:47 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-02 9:21 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-02 10:52 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-01 12:52 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-01 14:16 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-01 14:24 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-02 9:36 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-02 11:07 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-02 11:36 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-02 11:42 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-02 10:17 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1283344912.4124.2.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.