All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH w-t] iwlwifi: rewrite iwl-scan.c to avoid race conditions
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:58:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100901115826.GB6547@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1283338760.4131.22.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>

On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 12:59:20PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 17:00 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> 
> > Scan works have now custom workqueue to allow scan functions
> > to run in parallel with other iwlwifi works, which could wait
> > for scan abort finish.
> 
> Do we really need a complete workqueue? It seems like the relevant work
> structs that really do need to be waited for from the workqueue can be
> queued with schedule_work?

Custom workqueue is not strictly needed, but it assure all works will
run short after schedule. Common workqueue can not give us such guarantees,
as other driver/subsystem can schedule own work, possibly slow, which
can block start of our work for long time.

> Shouldn't that only be a few of them anyway?

For sure abort_scan and abort_timeout works have to be scheduled on something
other than priv->workqueue. I'm queuing all scan works on priv->scan_workqueue
for consistency.

Stanislaw  

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-01 12:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-31 15:00 [PATCH w-t] iwlwifi: rewrite iwl-scan.c to avoid race conditions Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-01 10:59 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-01 11:58   ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2010-09-01 12:41     ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-01 14:16       ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-01 14:26         ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-01 15:24           ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-01 16:04             ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-02  8:47               ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-02  9:21                 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-02 10:52                   ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-01 12:52 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-01 14:16   ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-01 14:24     ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-02  9:36 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-02 11:07   ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-02 11:36     ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-02 11:42       ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-02 10:17 ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100901115826.GB6547@redhat.com \
    --to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.