From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sched: automated per session task groups
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 06:45:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1291009528.9082.8.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin5Z_WdAPDfcS3V3DCcN40HLDfpzK-o0XeSMiQh@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 11:31 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> > Something else is seriously wrong though. 36.1 with attached (plus
> > sched, cgroup: Fixup broken cgroup movement) works a treat, whereas
> > 37.git and tip with fixlet below both suck rocks. With a make -j40
> > running, wakeup-latency is showing latencies of >100ms, amarok skips,
> > mouse lurches badly.. generally horrid. Something went south.
>
> Can you test -rc3? Is that still ok? And are you perhaps using
> Nouveau? There's a report of some graphics (?) regression since -rc3
> about bad desktop performance:
No Nouveau here, plain old boring nv.
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23912
>
> but it doesn't have any more information yet (so if -rc3 _is_ good for
> you, and you can add anything to that report, it would be good. The
> original reporter is hopefully bisecting it now)
I'll hunt as soon as I can (inbox runneth over).
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-29 5:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-21 13:37 [PATCH v4] sched: automated per session task groups Ingo Molnar
2010-11-21 13:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-21 15:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-21 16:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-21 16:15 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-21 18:43 ` Gene Heskett
2010-11-25 16:00 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-28 14:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-28 19:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-28 20:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-29 11:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-29 12:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-29 13:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-29 13:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-29 14:04 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-29 16:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-29 16:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-29 17:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-29 18:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-29 19:06 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-29 19:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-30 3:39 ` Paul Turner
2010-11-30 4:14 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-30 4:23 ` Paul Turner
2010-11-30 13:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-30 13:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-30 13:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-30 14:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-30 16:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-30 15:17 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-11-30 17:13 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-30 19:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 5:01 ` Américo Wang
2010-12-01 6:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-01 11:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 22:12 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-12-01 5:57 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-01 11:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 11:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-01 14:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 15:04 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-30 7:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-30 14:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-30 14:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-30 15:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-30 15:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-30 16:28 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-29 5:45 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2010-12-01 3:39 ` Paul Turner
2010-12-01 3:39 ` Paul Turner
2010-12-01 6:16 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-03 5:11 ` Paul Turner
2010-12-03 6:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-03 8:37 ` Paul Turner
2010-12-04 23:55 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2010-12-05 5:11 ` Paul Turner
2010-12-07 11:32 ` Paul Turner
2010-12-15 12:10 ` Paul Turner
2010-12-01 11:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-15 1:13 [RFC/RFT PATCH v3] sched: automated per tty " Mike Galbraith
2010-11-15 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-15 11:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-15 11:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-15 12:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-15 21:25 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-16 13:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-16 14:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-16 15:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-16 15:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-16 17:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-20 19:35 ` [PATCH v4] sched: automated per session " Mike Galbraith
2010-12-04 17:39 ` Colin Walters
2010-12-04 18:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-12-04 20:01 ` Colin Walters
2010-12-04 22:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-12-04 23:43 ` Colin Walters
2010-12-05 0:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-12-05 7:47 ` Ray Lee
2010-12-05 19:22 ` Colin Walters
2010-12-05 20:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-12-05 22:47 ` Colin Walters
2010-12-05 22:58 ` Jesper Juhl
2010-12-05 23:05 ` Jesper Juhl
2010-12-07 18:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-05 10:18 ` Con Kolivas
2010-12-05 11:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-05 20:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-12-04 23:31 ` david
2010-12-05 11:11 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2010-12-06 0:28 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1291009528.9082.8.camel@marge.simson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.