From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sched: automated per session task groups
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:54:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1291103647.24405.5.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101129192033.GA18372@elte.hu>
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 20:20 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> > > I know, from the testing so far we _thought_ it was fairly sane. Apparently
> > > there's still some work to do.
> >
> > Damn thing bisected to:
> >
> > commit 92fd4d4d67b945c0766416284d4ab236b31542c4
> > Merge: fe7de49 e53beac
> > Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Date: Thu Nov 18 13:22:14 2010 +0100
> >
> > Merge commit 'v2.6.37-rc2' into sched/core
> >
> > Merge reason: Move to a .37-rc base.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> >
> > 92fd4d4d67b945c0766416284d4ab236b31542c4 is the first bad commit
>
> Hm, i'd suggest to double check the two originator points:
>
> e53beac - is it really 'bad' ?
> fe7de49 - is it really 'good'?
Nope. I did a bisection this morning in text mode with a pipe-test
based measurement proggy, and it bisected cleanly.
2069dd75c7d0f49355939e5586daf5a9ab216db7 is the first bad commit
commit 2069dd75c7d0f49355939e5586daf5a9ab216db7
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date: Mon Nov 15 15:47:00 2010 -0800
sched: Rewrite tg_shares_up)
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-30 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-21 13:37 [PATCH v4] sched: automated per session task groups Ingo Molnar
2010-11-21 13:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-21 15:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-21 16:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-21 16:15 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-21 18:43 ` Gene Heskett
2010-11-25 16:00 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-28 14:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-28 19:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-28 20:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-29 11:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-29 12:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-29 13:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-29 13:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-29 14:04 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-29 16:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-29 16:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-29 17:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-29 18:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-29 19:06 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-29 19:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-30 3:39 ` Paul Turner
2010-11-30 4:14 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-30 4:23 ` Paul Turner
2010-11-30 13:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-30 13:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-30 13:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-30 14:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-30 16:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-30 15:17 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-11-30 17:13 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-30 19:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 5:01 ` Américo Wang
2010-12-01 6:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-01 11:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 22:12 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-12-01 5:57 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-01 11:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 11:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-01 14:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 15:04 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-30 7:54 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2010-11-30 14:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-30 14:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-30 15:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-30 15:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-30 16:28 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-29 5:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-01 3:39 ` Paul Turner
2010-12-01 3:39 ` Paul Turner
2010-12-01 6:16 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-03 5:11 ` Paul Turner
2010-12-03 6:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-03 8:37 ` Paul Turner
2010-12-04 23:55 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2010-12-05 5:11 ` Paul Turner
2010-12-07 11:32 ` Paul Turner
2010-12-15 12:10 ` Paul Turner
2010-12-01 11:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-15 1:13 [RFC/RFT PATCH v3] sched: automated per tty " Mike Galbraith
2010-11-15 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-15 11:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-15 11:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-15 12:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-15 21:25 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-16 13:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-16 14:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-16 15:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-16 15:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-16 17:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-20 19:35 ` [PATCH v4] sched: automated per session " Mike Galbraith
2010-12-04 17:39 ` Colin Walters
2010-12-04 18:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-12-04 20:01 ` Colin Walters
2010-12-04 22:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-12-04 23:43 ` Colin Walters
2010-12-05 0:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-12-05 7:47 ` Ray Lee
2010-12-05 19:22 ` Colin Walters
2010-12-05 20:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-12-05 22:47 ` Colin Walters
2010-12-05 22:58 ` Jesper Juhl
2010-12-05 23:05 ` Jesper Juhl
2010-12-07 18:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-05 10:18 ` Con Kolivas
2010-12-05 11:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-05 20:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-12-04 23:31 ` david
2010-12-05 11:11 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2010-12-06 0:28 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1291103647.24405.5.camel@marge.simson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.